Blog Post

Remote work, EU labour markets and wage inequality

More remote working in the wake of the pandemic could exacerbate wage inequality, with young workers, women and the low educated potentially losing out.

By: and Date: September 14, 2021 Topic: Digital economy and innovation

This Blog was produced within the project “Future of Work and Inclusive Growth in Europe“, with the financial support of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth.

On the eve of the COVID-19 pandemic, in March 2020, unemployment in the European Union stood at the historic low rate of 6.3%. Due to the pandemic, it then began to rise, reaching 7.7% in September 2020. While unemployment has declined somewhat since then, signalling that the EU is on the path to labour market recovery, the nature of some jobs has changed with major implications for EU employment.

The pandemic has particularly impacted jobs that cannot be done remotely. Dingel and Neiman (2020) developed a remote work score for different types of occupation (Figure 1). Occupations with a score close to zero cannot be done remotely, while most tasks in occupations with scores close to 1 can be done remotely without significant problems and in line with social-distancing restrictions.

Occupations such as cleaning and food preparation (which are classified as elementary), plant operation, assembly and craft-related trades cannot easily be done remotely and therefore have been severely impacted by the pandemic. In contrast, high-skilled managerial jobs are relatively easy to adjust to social-distancing restrictions.

Figure 2 plots remote work scores relative to EU average annual wages for each occupation type for 2019, before the pandemic impacted the EU labour market. Low-paid jobs are the least possible to be done remotely. The remote work score increases as for occupations types with higher average wages in the EU.

Evidence suggests that the increase in the prevalence of remote work will persist in the long-run post-pandemic. That may suggest that some low-paid/low-skilled jobs are at risk because when some jobs are increasingly done remotely, other jobs linked to them become less viable. If, for example, office time or business travel drastically reduce, so will demand for office cleaning, travel services and food preparation. This could result in downward pressure on the wages of these occupations and higher unemployment rates for low-paid jobs.

Over the next decade, 4.3 million jobs could disappear in customer service and food service, compared to before the pandemic, according to McKinsey (in an analysis covering eight large countries, including France, Germany and Spain). The increase in transportation and last-mile delivery jobs (an additional 760,000 jobs) will only partially offset those losses. McKinsey also estimated that business travel will not return to its pre-pandemic level and will drop by 20% in the post-pandemic era (a Bloomberg survey pointed in the same direction). This could significantly reduce employment in commercial aviation and airport services, and in hospitality and food service.

The implication is that a safety net should be prioritised, with a mix of policies for those who are most affected or excluded from the ongoing COVID-19-induced transformation of work, a major ingredient of which is the accelerating digitalisation of the economy. The distributional effects of such a transformation of work also raise concerns. Remote work is not neutral with respect to the wages of different demographic groups and groups with different educational attainment, or across EU countries.

To illustrate this, we first consider how remote work is related to wage inequality given the EU occupational structure before the pandemic, and then we refer to preliminary findings and relevant data on the impact of the pandemic on these groups.

We begin by calculating for each occupation type the EU wage gap between old and young workers as a percentage of the average occupational wage in EU labour markets in 2019 (our measure of the age wage gap). We see that in general occupation types more amenable to remote work are on average those with greater age-related wage gaps. In some managerial and professional occupation types, the age wage gap exceeds 50% (eg hospitality, administrative and commercial managers, science, engineering, legal and ICT professionals), while in occupations with low remote scores, such as farming and fishing, or in street sales and services, the age wage gap is much smaller or even inverted (the young earn more than older workers on average in some of these types of jobs).

It is unsurprising that evidence on the short-term impact of the pandemic shows that youth unemployment increased during the second quarter of 2020, while unemployment remained almost unchanged compared to the year before for the older cohort. Young people, especially in low-paid occupations with limited opportunities for remote work, were particularly vulnerable.

We now consider the EU average wage gap between men and women in 2019 as a percentage of the EU average occupational wage (Figure 4). Comparing Figure 1 and Figure 4, we see that there seems to be a non-linear relationship between remote work scores and the gender wage gap. In general, in occupations with relatively low remote scores, we observe significant variation in terms of the gender wage gap. For example, in elementary occupations, the wage gap is small (only 8.2%) in food preparation services, but appears to be high for cleaners and helpers (42%). The largest gender wage gap at EU level is not in managerial jobs that can easily be done remotely, but in the category of service and sales workers (with personal and protective service workers and sales workers being the frontrunners in gender wage inequality with wage gaps of 54% and 47%, respectively), for which remote work scores are on average much lower. Service and sales is also the category with the highest number of female workers in the EU (more than 22% of women in the EU labour force were working in this occupational category in 2019).

It is not easy to reach a safe conclusion about the exact relationship between gender inequality and remote work by only looking at the occupational structure before the pandemic, because of the non-linearities involved.

Looking instead at the pandemic period, McKinsey found that COVID-19 has disproportionately affected women and in particular young mothers with children. They have either moved out of the workforce or have stepped back from their careers as they faced greater obstacles to working from home. This finding is associated with reasons that go beyond the occupational ability to work remotely, including women’s contributions to households and childcare that can interfere with their work from home.

Educational attainment is another important factor to consider. The wage gap between low- and high-educated people is on average increasing in occupations more suited to remote work. Evidence from the pandemic period suggests that people with lower educational levels are less able to work remotely than people with tertiary degrees. If indeed low remote-work-score jobs are at risk, the returns to education could increase, suggesting that wage (and income) inequality across groups with different educational attainment will rise.

Last but not least, we can also look from a country perspective. The share of work that can be done remotely varies across EU countries. It appears strongly correlated with the GDP per capita in each country (2019; Figure 5). On average, the EU’s remote work score is lower than those of the United States and United Kingdom.

This implies that each country will experience a different intensity of transformation of work as each country relies to a different extent on tools that enable productive remote work. In the post-pandemic era, this may have serious implications for the labour productivity of each country and could lead to increasing divergence in labour output in different EU countries.

If there is to be a hybrid work framework in which remote working is an important element, it is vital to consider the implications for wage inequality so safeguards can be put in place and the future growth path is inclusive.

Recommended citation: 

Petropoulos, G. and T.Schraepen  (2021) ‘Remote work, EU labour markets and wage inequality’, Bruegel Blog, 14 September


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Jun
7
10:30

Future of Work and Inclusive Growth Annual Conference

Annual Conference of the Future of Work and Inclusive Growth project

Speakers: Erik Brynjolfsson, Carl Frey, Francis Green, Francis Hintermann, Ivailo Kalfin, Vladimir Kvetan, J. Scott Marcus, Anoush Margaryan, Julia Nania, Laura Nurski, Poon King Wang, Monika Queisser, Fabian Stephany, Niels van Weeren and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Digital economy and innovation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Job quality is about more than working conditions

What is job quality and why does it matter?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Inclusive growth Date: May 19, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

Inclusive growth

Is the workforce ready for the jobs of the future? Data-informed skills and training foresight

For many newly emerging jobs, labour-market mismatches prevail as workers and firms are unable to apply precise occupation taxonomies and training lags behind workforce needs. We report on how data can enable useful foresight about skill requirements and training needs, even when that data has not been collected for this express purpose.

By: Fabian Stephany and Rosemary Luckin Topic: Inclusive growth Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Policy Contribution

Inclusive growth

Beating burnout: identifying bad jobs and improving job quality

To improve wellbeing at work, job quality policy should pay more attention to imbalances in job content – like high workloads and low autonomy – and not just working conditions. Outcomes of low-quality jobs, such as burnout, need to be monitored at the European level.

By: Mia Hoffmann and Laura Nurski Topic: Inclusive growth Date: May 5, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

COVID-19 and the shift to working from home: differences between the US and the EU

What changes has working from home brought on for workers and societies, and how can policy catch up?

Speakers: Jose Maria Barrero, Mamta Kapur, J. Scott Marcus and Laura Nurski Topic: Inclusive growth Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: April 28, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Making remote work, work

How do we address the challenges of remote work? Lessons from both sides of the Atlantic.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Inclusive growth Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Policy Contribution

Inclusive growth

Better pensions for the European Union’s self-employed

What is the current state of pensions policy in Europe and how are independent workers treated compared with their traditionally employed counterparts?

By: Rebecca Christie, Monika Grzegorczyk and Diane Mulcahy Topic: Inclusive growth Date: March 24, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Online labour: Can we all just move to Tahiti?

How is online labour different from remote work?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Digital economy and innovation Date: March 23, 2022
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Make AI boring again

How can AI education improve workers' experience?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: January 19, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governanceInclusive growth

12 Charts for 21

A selection of charts from Bruegel’s weekly newsletter, analysis of the year and what it meant for the economy in Europe and the world.

By: Hèctor Badenes, Henry Naylor, Giuseppe Porcaro and Yuyun Zhan Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: December 21, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

Market power and artificial intelligence work on online labour markets

In this working paper, the authors investigate three alternative but complementary indicators of market power on one of the largest online labour markets (OLMs) in Europe.

By: Néstor Duch-Brown, Estrella Gomez-Herrera, Frank Mueller-Langer and Songül Tolan Topic: Digital economy and innovation Date: December 16, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

An inclusive European Union must boost gig workers’ rights

A European initiative strengthening rights for gig workers is welcome. A digitised economy should also be inclusive.

By: Mario Mariniello Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: December 7, 2021
Load more posts