Blog Post

Electricity Infrastructure – more border crossings or a borderless Europe?

Enabling the seamless trade in electricity across borders would help to deliver on all three European energy policy targets – security, sustainability and competitiveness.

By: Date: February 27, 2013 Topic: Energy & Climate

Enabling the seamless trade in electricity across borders would help to deliver on all three European energy policy targets – security, sustainability and competitiveness. Security would be increased because local supply shortages can be addressed by importing electricity from elsewhere. A larger-than-national market would mean that competition between national energy companies should lead to increases in efficiency and reductions in prices. Finally, in a European market, intermittent supply of energy from local renewable sources can be reliably averaged across wide geographic areas, reducing the need (and thus costs) of back-up capacity and system-stabilising services.

Based on this logic, the EU has been striving for more than 20 years to establish an internal electricity market. The target has been made concrete, with a deadline set in the Conclusions of the European Council of 4 February 2011, that the internal energy market should be completed by 2014. However, a number of milestones on the way to the deadline are about to be missed.

The most recent news is that the start of market coupling is postponed. Market coupling is a system that in principle would ensure that price differentials between countries only arise when no additional transmission capacity can be made available. Already last year the deadline for the start of the arguably more advanced “flow-based market coupling” in the Central-Western region (Austria, Benelux, France) had to be postponed from September 2012 to November 2013 at the earliest. Now, the coupling of the Nordic markets with the Central-Western markets has also been delayed from the beginning of this year to November 2013.

The development of network codes – that is detailed rules on all aspects of network operation relevant for cross-border electricity exchanges – is also running into difficulties. Delays are, for example, becoming likely for the network codes on “Capacity Allocation and Congestion Management” and on “Requirements for Generators” (see the conclusions of the most recent Florence Forum). The drafting of twelve interrelated network codes within only 12 months is already a tall order; these initial delays might result in tough trade-offs having to be made between speed and thoroughness.

Finally, network extension has been slower than planned. About half of the projects in the European network operators’ 2010 network development plan have been considered as delayed in 2012. According to this report only 52 percent of the (sub-)projects are proceeding as planned, 28 percent are postponed because of delays in the authorisation process, 6 percent are delayed because generators rescheduled their plans, and 13 percent are delayed for other reasons.

These delays might be symptoms of more structural difficulties. In a new Policy Contribution, we argue that the current approach is unable to align the incentives for energy companies with societal objectives, and to fully take the physical realities of the electricity system into account. We argue that without a bold step towards independent European network operation and planning, as well as some socialisation of network costs, we will not see the infrastructure needed to increase the reliability of the network, enable a truly borderless European electricity market, and facilitate the integration of renewables.

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

How the EU could transform the energy market: The case for a euro crude-oil benchmark

There is a strong case for an oil benchmark in euros. Trading energy markets in more than one currency is not unprecedented, and indeed used to be the norm. Europe – with its powerful currency and reliable regulatory environment – should stand a good chance of success.

By: Elina Ribakova Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 13, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

External Publication

The European Gas Markets

This book, co-edited by Bruegel's Research Fellow Simone Tagliapietra, explores in detail the challenges which the European gas markets currently face, and the opportunities they present. Bringing together some of the most prominent gas experts on Europe from both academia and industry, this edited volume provides a comprehensive analysis of the various economic, political and technological factors that interact in this sector.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Date: August 31, 2017
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The US 100% renewables dispute

What’s at stake: Two years ago, a debate started on whether it would be feasible for the US to achieve 100% renewable energy power. The arguments on both sides have been fierce, and more has been written recently. We review the debate.

By: Silvia Merler Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 26, 2017
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Re-powering electricity markets

Europe talks a lot about energy market reforms, but what is the global context? Which measures would be most effective in delivering the kind of energy market needed for decarbonisation?

Speakers: Manuel Baritaud, Walter Boltz, Alain Janssens, Konstantin Staschus and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 24, 2016
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The European Energy Union: Slogan or an important step towards integration?

The broad definition of an Energy Union may enable the European Commission to facilitate a radical compromise between the member states. Because Germany's energy and climate policy goals can be realised only within the European network, the country ought to play an active role in this process.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 17, 2015
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A European gas market for everyone

The European energy landscape has changed markedly in 2014. Now the EU must rethink its relationship over gas with Russia and Ukraine.

By: Agata Loskot-Strachota and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: January 5, 2015
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Policy Brief

Elements of Europe's energy union

To meet the EU's objectives for emissions, electricity supply and gas security of supply, well-designed European markets could provide better results at lower cost than uncoordinated national approaches. In other areas – such as energy efficiency and supporting innovation – markets alone might not be enough. Europe should thus rethink its quantitative headline targets for 2030.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: September 9, 2014
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

EU vs. regional electricity markets: Don't think too small

A comment on the ‘Schengenisation’ of EU energy policy: going for regional electricity markets instead of an EU-wide market comes at a cost.

By: Georg Zachmann and Michele Peruzzi Topic: Energy & Climate Date: October 9, 2013
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Making the internal electricity market work

Why the economic pressure to create a comprehensive internal energy market is building

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 26, 2013
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Borderless electricity: completing the internal energy market

To reap the significant benefits from an integrated European electricity market, we propose the following blueprint: First, we suggest adding a European system-management layer. Second, the role of the European ten year network development plan (TYNDP) needs to be upgraded. Third, sharing the cost of network investments in Europe is critical.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: September 11, 2013
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Blueprint

Electricity without borders: a plan to make the internal market work

To reap the significant benefits from an integrated European electricity market, we propose the following blueprint: add a European system-management layer to complement national operation centres, upgrade the role of the European ten year network development plan, and share cost of network investments in Europe.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: September 4, 2013
Read article More by this author
 

Video

Video

An Internal Energy Market for Europe: why and when?

Bruegel Fellow Georg Zachmann explains the state of the internal energy market in Europa and outlines the benefits of making rapid progress on its completion.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: August 28, 2013
Load more posts