Opinion

Keeping the energy policy triangle in balance is key to reach net-zero

Delivering policies that address energy security, competitiveness and sustainability is one of the most formidable challenges facing governments in the 21st century.

By: Date: November 9, 2021 Topic: Green economy

This piece was originally published in Corriere della Sera, Le Monde and El País, Kathimerini and Rzeczpospolita.

Corriere della Sera logo

El País logo

Le Monde logo

Rzecszpospolita logo

From the G20 in Rome to the COP26 in Glasgow, the global energy and climate conversation reveals a fundamental truth: everyone wants to save the planet, but no one wants higher domestic energy bills.

In their Rome Declaration, G20 leaders outlined their commitment to guaranteeing a “just and orderly transitions of our energy systems that ensures affordability, including for the most vulnerable households and businesses”. At COP26 in Glasgow, US President Biden was even clearer, singling out OPEC and Russia as needing “to pump more oil” to contain the global rise in energy prices.

As ironic this may seem – pushing for more oil and gas production, while at the same time pledging higher climate ambition – these positions should not come as a surprise.

Energy is a complex matter. Behind simple daily actions such as turning a light on or refuelling a car at the pump, stand complex technologies and massive infrastructures, frequently linking faraway countries – different continents even. Numerous technical steps are required to extract, process, transport and distribute traditional energy sources such as oil and gas and, likewise, numerous are the steps required to harness energy from the sun, wind or from water and distribute it to our homes, industries or cars.

The governance of energy is no less complicated than its technical aspects. Being that energy is the lifeblood of our modern societies, governments have traditionally played an important role in the sector, driven by different goals, such as ensuring that citizens have a reliable and affordable energy supply.

The multifaced nature of energy policy can be schematised with a triangle, whose vertexes are security, competitiveness and sustainability.

Energy security relates to the uninterrupted availability of energy. This has both long- and short-term dimensions. Long-term energy security deals with timely investments to supply energy in line with societal needs. Short-term energy security focuses on the ability of the energy system to react promptly to sudden changes within the supply-demand balance. As energy is vital for the functioning of our societies, energy security represents a top priority for any government in the world.

Energy competitiveness relates to the affordability of energy prices for both households and businesses, as well as to their international competitiveness. As a lack of energy competitiveness can push part of the population into energy poverty and undermine a country’s economic and industrial competitiveness, this also represents a key priority for governments.

Sustainability relates to the reduction – or, ideally, to the complete mitigation – of the damaging effects of energy exploration, production and consumption on the climate and the environment. The combustion of fossil fuels, which still account today for 80 percent of the global energy mix, indeed represents the major contributor to climate change, as well as to air pollution and other environmental problems. Governments have increasingly become more attentive to this issue, as also signalled by the wave of climate neutrality pledges over the last few years.

In an ideal world, these three components would be perfectly balanced and countries would be able to offer their citizens a secure, cost-competitive and environmentally sustainable energy system. But, in reality, difficult trade-offs exist between these three components and governments must take policy choices that might – at least temporarily – favour one or two elements over the other(s).

The global energy crunch we are currently experiencing represents a striking example of this trade-off. Faced with the urgent necessity of guaranteeing the security of energy supply and of limiting the socio-economic impact of the sharp rise in natural gas prices, a number of countries – from the United Kingdom to China, Germany and India – have not hesitated to resort to higher coal consumption to deal with the situation.

Delivering energy policies that simultaneously address these three goals is one of the most formidable challenges facing governments in the 21st century, particularly in view of the pressing need to scale-up action against the existential threat of climate change.

This is also urgent because, as the current global energy crunch clearly illustrates, if the equilibrium gets disrupted by an external factor, rebalancing will always see security and competitiveness prevailing over sustainability.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

REPowerEU: will EU countries really make it work?

By acting together, the European Union can optimise its response to the energy crisis in all scenarios but each country will have to make concessions.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Green economy Date: May 18, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

The EU needs transparent oil data and enhanced coordination

The EU lacks the coordination structure and transparent data necessary to most effectively navigate an embargo on Russian oil.

By: Agata Łoskot-Strachota, Ben McWilliams and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: May 16, 2022
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

For Europe, an oil embargo is not the way to go

Even at this late hour, the European Union should consider taking a different path.

By: Simone Tagliapietra, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 9, 2022
Read article
 

External Publication

The Global Quest for Green Growth: An Economic Policy Perspective

A review on green growth and degrowth arguments.

By: Klaas Lenaerts, Simone Tagliapietra and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: May 5, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

A tariff on imports of fossil fuel from Russia

A tariff on imports of Russian fossil fuels would allow Europe to hit Russia's energy sector without great suffering.

By: Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 2, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

How to weaken Russian oil and gas strength

Letter published in Science.

By: Ricardo Hausmann, Agata Łoskot-Strachota, Axel Ockenfels, Ulrich Schetter, Simone Tagliapietra, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 2, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

A phase out of Russian oil may be less effective than a tariff at reducing Putin’s rents

A punitive tariff on all energy imports from Russia would be a better choice than a gradually phased-in embargo on selected fuels.

By: Simone Tagliapietra, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 2, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

How a European Union tariff on Russian oil can be designed

The European Union should apply a tariff on imports of Russian oil; it can be accompanied by a quota for a gradual, conditional phase-out of all Russian oil imports.

By: David Kleimann, Ben McWilliams and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article
 

Opinion

EU risks letting Putin’s gas divide-and-rule strategy win

The 2 May meeting of EU energy ministers should deliver strong and common EU action. Failing to do so would undermine Europe’s unity, energy security and foreign policy.

By: Agata Łoskot-Strachota, Simone Tagliapietra and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

Europe must get serious about cutting oil and gas use

As energy security risks increase, European governments must stop subsidising oil and gas, and ask people to consume less.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF
 

Working Paper

Cutting Putin’s energy rent: ‘smart sanctioning’ Russian oil and gas

The most efficient way for Europe to sanction Russian energy would not be an embargo, but the introduction of an import tariff that can be used flexibly to control the degree of economic pressure on Russia.

By: Ricardo Hausmann, Agata Łoskot-Strachota, Axel Ockenfels, Simone Tagliapietra, Ulrich Schetter, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: April 28, 2022
Load more posts