Opinion

The perils of more debt

Europe must find the “Ways and Means”.

By: and Date: April 10, 2020 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

The Bank of England has yesterday announced that it “will directly finance the extra spending needs of the UK government on a temporary basis…allowing the Treasury to bypass the bond market.” This will be done through the “Ways and Means” (sic) facility that will rise to an undisclosed amount, meaning probably big. This will allow the government to meet its exorbitant cash needs without having to pile on marketable debt.

This is an emergency facility but it smells of monetary financing. Yes, it is risky. That is why it is clearly stated that it will be temporary. And it needs to be done under the tight hand of the rule of law, that protects Central Bank independence from political involvement but understands that in times of “war” political leadership is not only desired, it is imperative.

Europeans, by contrast, are wasting valuable time over what level of conditionality is acceptable for countries to borrow from a properly adjusted European Stability Mechanism. While no one can deny the need for many and varied instruments to deal with the shock, in the process we are missing the bigger picture.

ECB decisions last week have enabled all sovereigns in the euro area to tap the markets for much needed cash.  No country will be left without the necessary cash to fight the current pandemic on account of past fiscal sins. Decisive and timely.

However, as countries tap the markets to find the much-needed cash, they are seeing a very large increase in their levels of debt. For as long as the ECB is buying, access will be both safeguarded and it will be cheap.

Six months from now, our societies will be different. Hopefully better, as there will no longer be human losses to the pandemic, health systems will be unclogged and the economy will have been brought back from an induced coma.

But the economies will not necessarily be out of danger. A number of countries, hopefully small, will likely fail the multiple IMF and ESM fiscal sustainability tests.  Then these countries will have no option but to turn to the ESM and “troika”. Equally, the eurozone will have no option but to significantly increase the corresponding ESM facilities if these countries are “too big to fail”.  Euro area countries will then be forced to take the decisions that they are unable to take today, only this time under explicit market duress.

But to think that debt is a problem for this small group of countries only, is also short-sighted. The euro area entered this pandemic with very low and declining real interest rates. Our debt financing means of current expenditures will only aggravate and prolong this trend. Excessive debts will increase the private sector’s precautionary savings. Public indebtedness will tie up fiscal policy for a long time. Authorities will have little room to stimulate through investments, necessary for private investments to follow. This will further suppress the level of real interest rates and in turn the continent’s growth prospects and increase economic vulnerabilities. As the economy remains at the zero-lower bound, monetary policy will also be unable to help. What will macroeconomic policy look like then?

Although premature, the continents exit strategy from the fight against the pandemic will be affected by the economic choices we make today.

It is time to think of other options that involve monetary financing. One such option is to convince the ECB to monetise the debt by keeping it in its balance sheets ad infinitum. This however requires a pre-commitment on the part of the ECB that is rather unlikely to be given as it would be sealing its loss of independence. But it is also not desirable as we would be faced with the unholy trinity: high fiscal debts, a dependent Central Bank and no macroeconomic policy space. Nobody wants that.

This is why we need more permanent solutions that go in the direction of the Bank of England’s latest actions and possibly beyond. This is difficult in the current set up in the euro area, as monetary financing is prohibited by the treaties. But to think that treaties are designed to deal will all contingencies is an excuse for inaction. Inaction that we simply cannot afford. Europe must find the “Ways and Means”.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Covid-19 and emerging economies: What to expect in the short- and medium-term

This article was originally published in the Observer Research Foundation. As Brazil, Russia, India and Mexico record the fast spread of the Covid-19 contagion, a third wave of the pandemic is reaching the emerging world. As a result, business sentiment has decreased in March and April in the region. What’s more, as emerging economies gradually […]

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 3, 2020
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Jun
10
14:30

Insuring for pandemic-related losses, in this crisis and future ones

What remedies and lessons for the insurance sector in the time of pandemic?

Speakers: Frederic de Courtois, Dirk Schoenmaker and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

An uncompromising budget

Apart from decisive European Central Bank measures, the EU-wide response to the COVID crisis had been rather weak until the Commission put on the table a drastically new proposal: the creation of a new recovery facility, ‘Next Generation EU’, that would borrow money in the name of the EU to finance EU-wide expenditures. The changes to the proposed standard seven-year budget that primarily focuses on long-term structural issues are however generally small, and funding reductions are compensated by new funds from the recovery instrument, suggesting that an opportunity is missed to reform the EU budget.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 29, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

COVID-19’s shock for emerging economies

COVID-19 is by far the biggest challenge policymakers in emerging economies have had to deal with in recent history.

By: Bruegel Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 29, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The new EU budget: from COVID-19 remedies to green goals

Can we rescue the economy after COVID-19 and reach the environmental goals?

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Maria Demertzis, Karolina Ekholm and Miguel Otero-Iglesias Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 29, 2020
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

COVID-19’s reality shock for external-funding dependent emerging economies

COVID-19 is by far the biggest challenge policymakers in emerging economies have had to deal with in recent history. Beyond the potentially large negative impact on these countries’ fiscal accounts, and the related solvency issues, worsening conditions for these countries’ external funding are a major challenge.

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Elina Ribakova Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance Date: May 28, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The Covid Crisis and European State Aid Rules: The Case for a Rational Approach

Considering a new approach to find the way out of the Great Financial Crisis.

Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 27, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

COVID-19 and India: economic impact and response

This piece was published the day before India imposed one of the world's strictest lockdowns in its response to the COVID-19 response. It remains relevant in assessing the government's actions in the ten weeks that have since passed.

By: Suman Bery Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 27, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

An equity fund for a zombie-free and EU-wide recovery

Four guiding principles can help ensure a well designed EU equity fund.

By: Julia Anderson, Simone Tagliapietra and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 26, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Reading tea leaves from China’s two sessions: Large monetary and fiscal stimulus and still no growth guarantee

The announcement of a large stimulus without a growth target indicates that China’s recovery is far from complete.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 25, 2020
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

China’s financial system: opening up and system risk

China is opening up its financial sector- What does that mean for China and the world?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance Date: May 22, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The European Union’s SURE plan to safeguard employment: a small step forward

The new EU instrument to mitigate unemployment risks during an emergency (SURE) is too modest to have a significant impact the COVID-19 crisis beyond being a first step in the overall recovery plan.

By: Grégory Claeys Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 20, 2020
Load more posts