Blog Post

Our two cents on Belgium’s two cents

While the penny is still well and alive in the US, some countries are deciding to do away with their smallest monetary units for this very reason. Belgium is one such country

By: and Date: January 31, 2020 Topic: Banking and capital markets

“When people start leaving a monetary unit at the cash register for the next customer, the unit is too small to be useful.” When making this point in his 2006 list of New Year’s resolutions, Gregory Mankiw vowed to vote for the elimination of the penny. In his view, its value was so small that it no longer served the very purpose for which currencies were created: to facilitate exchange.

While the penny is still well and alive in the US, some countries are deciding to do away with their smallest monetary units for this very reason. Belgium is one such country.

In November 2018, Former Federal Economy Minister Kris Peeters announced that as of December 1st 2019, all businesses would have to round off their customers’ final due to the nearest 5-cent value for all cash payments at a point of sale. While businesses are still required to accept 1- and 2-cent coins, the aim is to remove them from circulation in the long run.

What is the motivation behind this? According to the Belgian government, these small-unit coins are costly and redundant.

Consumers in Belgium tend to find them difficult to use. When asked the question “with which of the following euro coins do you have particular difficulties?”, the proportion of Belgians answering 1- and 2-cent coins is far above the Euro Area average. In fact, in 2018, nearly three-quarters of them were in favour of abolishing 1- and 2-cent coins and requiring that stores round the final price of purchases to the nearest value of 5 cents.

Business-owners also find that counting, sorting and transporting these coins is costly and unnecessarily time-consuming, especially given the very little value they hold. Additionally, they can hold up lines at cash registers due to the difficulty people may have in differentiating between 1-, 2- and 5-cent coins. The difficulties consumers and businesses have when handling these small, copper-coated coins restricts their circulation, with most of them ending up at the bottom of drawers, pockets and untouched piggybanks.

Their high loss rate also has a significant cost for the Treasury. A study by the National Bank of Belgium found that in 2014, producing a single 1- or 2-cent coin cost the Royal Belgian Mint 2 to 2,5 cents, to which transport and stocking expenses have to be added. The demand for these coins has been steadily increasing since the introduction of the euro, mostly because businesses need them to give their customers exact change, but hardly receive any back as payment. This even led to a shortage in small-unit coins in 2018, which pushed the Federal Public Service for Finance to think of potential solutions.

Years before this, two towns in Belgium ran an experiment which could help with these troubles. For a period of 7 months, 200 businesses in Waregem and Visé rounded cash payments to the nearest multiple of 0.05. At the end of the trial period, 80% of business owners and 78% of consumers were in favor of this rounding method, which eliminated the need for 1- and 2-cent coins.

This practice has also been implemented in other European countries. For instance, Finland has never used 1- and 2-cent coins. Before euro bills and coins were even introduced in 2002, the country passed a law which required businesses to round cash payments to the nearest value of 5 cents. Since 2004, most Dutch businesses also practice rounding, following the publication of an expert group’s recommendations. However, this is not enforced by law like in Finland.

So why haven’t all Euro countries done away with their loose change? The European Commission studied this very question in a 2013 Communication to the Parliament and the Council. Though they concluded that 1- and 2-cent coins were undeniably a loss-making activity in the euro area, they also found that the general public had a strong attachment to these small denominations, and a fear that their removal might cause inflation.

Belgians do not particularly share this attachment to the euro’s smallest coins, but the question of a potential inflationary effect were they to be taken out of circulation is a concern. A 2006 Flash Eurobarometer found that nearly 4 in 5 Belgian respondents believed that removing 1- and 2-cent coins from circulation would lead to a price increase.

The National Bank of Belgium’s study looks into whether these fears have any founding, or if they are merely a mismatch between perception and reality. They begin by hypothesizing the mechanisms through which rounding could have an effect on inflation, be it positive or negative.

On the one hand, business-owners could act exactly as consumers expect them to: increase their prices in order to maximize profits, thus mechanically increasing inflation.

On the other, businesses will have less expenses as a result of no longer needing 1- and 2-cent coins, which could allow them to lower their prices – especially if the market they operate in is highly competitive. This would have the opposite effect on prices and actually slow down inflation.

Though the authors of the study do not draw any causal conclusion from it, they look into the Dutch example. It appears that there was no peak in inflation after rounding was introduced in 2004. However, Eurobarometer data shows that there was a sharp increase in public satisfaction towards the number of euro coins in use in the years after this.

Looking at countries outside of the Euro Area, the Czech Republic also withdrew its smallest-denomination coins in 2008 without appearing to trigger any inflationary effect. The same goes for Canada, which eliminated its pennies in 2013. Before implementing the policy, the Bank of Canada estimated that “any impact on inflation would be insignificant and more likely non-existent”.

The question is whether this will also hold for Belgium. In its study, the National Bank of Belgium discusses and updates a scenario analysis originally done by a steering group in 2004. The initial results suggested an effect of around 0.11% on inflation, and while the authors do not fully update these results in their 2014 report, they argue that the effect is likely even smaller at the time they are writing, for two reasons.

First, cumulated inflation since 2003 has mechanically reduced the relative weight of rounding, since the price base is higher. Second, since inflation remained overall rather high between 2004 and 2014 – excluding a significant dip between 2009 and 2010 – 1- and 2-cent coins lost even more of their already weak face value. This probably led some businesses to “naturally” round some of their prices to the closest value of 0.05, as they had no use for the precision of smaller denominations. As such, it is likely there were less prices ending in values other than 0.00 and 0.05 in 2014 than there were in 2004, making the effect of rounding on prices even less significant.

Both of these arguments are even truer today than in 2014, cumulated inflation since 2004 having increased and inflation in Belgium having remained positive since then. Additionally, businesses have been legally authorized to practice rounding since 2014. Though it is estimated that only about a third of all businesses actually did this before December 2019, this also undoubtedly reduces any potential inflationary effect.

The European Commission led its own study in 2013 on the inflationary effect that taking 1- and 2-cent coins out of circulation could have, at the scale of the whole Euro Area, and also found that it would be negligible. Today, it is even considering a proposal to phase out – and ultimately fully withdraw – these coins.

The Commission, however, does warn that this policy could have a distortionary effect on perceived inflation. Policymakers want to avoid a further break in the relationship between perceived and measured inflation, as appears to have happened when the euro was introduced. As such, rounding should be accompanied by a strong communication campaign to inform the public.

This has indeed been done in Belgium, where posters of smiling 1- and 2-cent-coin characters can be found plastered across the country, in shops and advertising spaces, with the slogans “On dit “oui” à l’arrondi” and “Tijd om af te ronden”, meaning “We say yes to rounding”. With little to no risk of this policy having any major inflationary effect, it looks like as of now, there is no need for a round table on rounding.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article
 

Blog Post

Now is not the time to confiscate Russia’s central bank reserves

The idea of confiscating the Bank of Russia’s frozen reserves is attractive to some, but at this stage in the Ukraine conflict confiscation would be counterproductive and likely illegal.

By: Nicolas Véron and Joshua Kirschenbaum Topic: Banking and capital markets, Global economy and trade Date: May 16, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Owning up to sustainability risks: the EU should champion international standards

To keep European Union capital markets open and integrated, new international standards should be reflected in future European law and accounting practice to provide further incentives for a reallocation of capital, reflecting in particular climate risks.

By: Alexander Lehmann Topic: Banking and capital markets, Green economy Date: April 26, 2022
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

War in Ukraine: sanctions on Russia two months in

A further look into sanctions on Russia and the implications for the global financial system.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Banking and capital markets, European governance Date: April 22, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

The European Union should sanction Sberbank and other Russian banks

Sanctions on Sberbank and most other Russian banks should be imposed by the EU, without delay and at no major cost to either itself or like-minded countries, while it ponders an oil and gas ban.

By: Joshua Kirschenbaum and Nicolas Véron Topic: Banking and capital markets, Global economy and trade Date: April 15, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

Close cooperation for bank supervision: The cases of Bulgaria and Croatia

In-depth analysis on the banking supervision cooperation in Bulgaria and Croatia prepared for the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: Banking and capital markets Date: March 30, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Tackling future risks to banks

How to address vulnerabilities in banks in the coming years?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis and Elizabeth McCaul Topic: Banking and capital markets Date: March 29, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

War in Ukraine: implications for the global financial system and central banks

A special episode of the Sound of Economics Live on the global financial system and central banks in the wake of sanctions imposed on Russia.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Banking and capital markets Date: March 2, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

War in Ukraine: implications for the global financial system and central banks

A special episode of the Sound of Economics Live on the global financial system and central banks in the wake of sanctions imposed on Russia.

Speakers: Silvia Merler, Giuseppe Porcaro and Nicolas Véron Topic: Banking and capital markets Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: March 2, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Venture capital: a new breath of life for European entrepreneurship?

Whether the dynamism of European venture capital of the past two years can be sustained and kick start a credible alternative to bank finance in the European Union remains to be seen.

By: Maria Demertzis and Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud Topic: Banking and capital markets Date: February 10, 2022
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

Nonperforming Loans in Asia and Europe—Causes, Impacts, and Resolution Strategies

What can we learn from the experiences of Asia and Europe with regard to NPLs during the financial crisis to help us weather the current and future ones?

Speakers: Rebecca Christie, Luis de Guindos, Alexander Lehmann, Cyn-Young Park, John Fell and Santiago Fernández de Lis Topic: Banking and capital markets, Global economy and trade Date: January 20, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governanceInclusive growth

12 Charts for 21

A selection of charts from Bruegel’s weekly newsletter, analysis of the year and what it meant for the economy in Europe and the world.

By: Hèctor Badenes, Henry Naylor, Giuseppe Porcaro and Yuyun Zhan Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: December 21, 2021
Load more posts