Blog Post

Has ECB QE lifted inflation?

Euro-area headline inflation has remained close to zero since the ECB stepped up its quantitative easing programmes in early 2015, but this does not mean that QE has been ineffective: core inflation and its adjusted version for the indirect effects of low oil prices have steadily increased throughout 2015.

By: and Date: January 12, 2016 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

Despite efforts by the European Central Bank (ECB), recent euro-area inflation figures continue to be low, as shown in Figure 1. Headline inflation in the euro-area has remained close to zero since early 2015, when the ECB started its expanded asset purchase programme (EAPP), otherwise known as quantitative easing (QE).

Guntram Wolff has shown that market-based inflation expectations fell from July to September 2015 and remained well below the ECB’s 2% inflation benchmark. Inflation expectations have hardly changed since then.

Figure 1: Headline and core inflation, monthly data, 2007–2015 (% change compared to the same month of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_1

Sources: Euro-area: “All-items HICP” and “Overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” from Eurostat’s Harmonised Index of Consumer Prices [prc_hicp_manr] dataset; US: “Personal Consumption Expenditures: Chain-type Price Index” and “Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)” from FRED (Federal Reserve Economic Data), Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. For the US, we use the price index of personal consumption expenditures because this is the indicator considered by the Federal Reserve as reported by James Bullard. The first vertical line indicates January 2015 when the ECB announced its expanded asset purchase programme, while the second vertical line indicates March 2015 when the programme started.

Some observers may take these developments as evidence for the ineffectiveness of the ECB’s QE, but such a view would be wrong. In this post I show that euro area core inflation, a measure of inflation which disregards price changes for more volatile items like food and energy, as well as its adjusted versions for low energy prices have steadily increased throughout 2015, when we use quarterly data, which filters out short term noise.

Focusing on energy prices is rather obvious. Energy price developments do not really depend on ECB monetary policy measures. Low energy prices impact inflation, and not just because energy products accounts for more than 10 percent of the total consumer basket used to calculate inflation.

Energy has indirect and second round effects on inflation too, and so falling energy prices exert a downward pressure on core inflation. For example, the cost of transportation might fall, but more generally, lower energy prices reduce the costs of all producers, which may then reduce their sales prices in various sectors.

Yet the magnitude of this effect is not clear-cut. The ECB suggested in December 2014 that the fall in oil prices accounted for 0.6 percentage point of the total 0.9 percentage point decline in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 (see Box 3 in the December 2014 Monthly Bulletin).

It is puzzling that oil prices play such a large role, especially when compared to the US: Dae Woong Kang, Nick Ligthart and Ashoka Mody showed that core inflation fell much more in the euro area than in the US, while low oil prices had an impact in both economies.

In order to assess the impact of oil prices on euro-area and US core inflation rates, I use a simple regression model: see the details in the annex. I use this model to calculate an adjusted version of core inflation. The indicator I call ‘core inflation adjusted for energy prices’. I aim to answer the question of what core inflation would be if inflation rate of energy goods was the same as core inflation.

Both actual euro-area core inflation (red line) and the energy-adjusted core inflation (blue line) increased throughout 2015, as shown in Figure 2. Energy adjusted core inflation increased somewhat more than core inflation, suggesting that second-round effects of low oil prices matter, though the quantitative impact is not so large (my estimate for the contribution of oil prices to the fall in core inflation from late 2011 to mid-2014 is also well below the above mentioned ECB calculation).

For the US, I also find that energy-adjusted core inflation is higher than actual core inflation in 2015.

If my simple regression is able to capture the tendencies correctly, then euro area core inflation and its energy adjusted version have increased steadily since early 2015, at least using quarterly figures.

Current and energy-adjusted euro-area core inflation rates are still well below the ECB’s 2% threshold and are also below US core inflation, but my analysis shows that the very low euro  area headline inflation rates cannot be used to argue for the ineffectiveness of ECB QE.

Figure 2: Core inflation and its adjusted version, quarterly data, 2007 – 2015 (% change compared to the same quarter of the previous year)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_2

Source: core inflation is from Eurostat/St Luis FED, adjusted core inflation is my calculation (see Annex). The vertical line indicates the first quarter of 2015 when the ECB launched its expanded asset purchase programme.

Annex: the regression

I study the developments of the annual percent change in euro area core inflation defined by Eurostat as an “overall index excluding energy, food, alcohol and tobacco” that I call “core inflation”.

For the USA, I use the annual percent change in ‘Personal Consumption Expenditures Excluding Food and Energy: (Chain-Type Price Index)’.

My aim is to calculate a counterfactual indicator that I call “core inflation adjusted for energy prices”: what would core inflation be if energy goods inflation rate was the same as core inflation?

To this end, I convert the data from monthly to quarterly frequency (to reduce the short-term noise in the data) and estimate a Phillips-cure-type regression for core inflation:

ZD_12_1_16_EquationV2

where ZD_12_1_2016_Equation2 is core inflation,ZD_12_1_2016_Equation3 is the unemployment rate, ZD_12_1_2016_Equation4 is the so-called non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment (NAIRU, estimated by the OECD, see Figure 3), ZD_12_1_2016_Equation5 is the inflation rate of energy goods in the consumer price index,  ZD_12_1_2016_Equation6 is the error term and ZD_12_1_2016_Equation7 are parameters to be estimated. I allow lagged values up to four quarters (i.e. one year), because it can take time till unemployment and energy prince inflation can influence core inflation, while my general specification allows rich dynamic interactions between the variables.

I estimate this regression on quarterly data between 1999 and 2015. After estimating the regression, I calculate a counter-factual simulation for core inflation by setting the gap between energy and core inflation to zero throughout the sample period.

Starting from the 1999Q1 actual value of core inflation, I iterate the above equation using the estimated values of the parameters, the actual gap between the unemployment rate and NAIRU and the estimated error term (which captures all factors which are not included in the regression).

Certainly, one could use more sophisticated models, yet I believe this simple setup is able to provide useful results.

Figure 3: Unemployment rate and the NAIRU, quarterly data, 1999 – 2015 (%)

ZD_12_1_2016_FIG_3

Sources: Unemployment rate: Eurostat’s Unemployment rate by sex and age [une_rt_m] database; NAIRU (non-accelerating inflation rate of unemployment): OECD’s Economic Outlook No 98 (November 2015), which is available at the annual frequency: I converted the annual NAIRU estimates to the quarterly frequency.

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

How have the European Central Bank’s negative rates been passed on?

Negative rate cuts are not that different from ‘standard’ rate cuts. Like them, they reduce banks’ margins, but this effect does not appear to be amplified below 0%.

By: Grégory Claeys and Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 7, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

What to expect from the ECB’s monetary policy strategy review?

Emphasis will be placed on greening monetary policy and clarifying the ECB's price stability objective, but is this enough?

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 23, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inflation!? Germany, the euro area and the European Central Bank

There is concern in Germany about rising prices, but expectations and wage data show no sign of excess pressures; German inflation should exceed 2% to support euro-area rebalancing but is unlikely to do so on sustained basis.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 9, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

External Publication

European Parliament

What Are the Effects of the ECB’s Negative Interest Rate Policy?

This paper explores the potential effects (and side effects) of negative rates in theory and examines the evidence to determine what these effects have been in practice in the euro area.

By: Grégory Claeys Topic: European Parliament, Finance & Financial Regulation, Testimonies Date: June 9, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Emergency Liquidity Assistance: A new lease of life or kiss of death?

Use of Emergency Liquidity Assistance to prop up euro-area banks needs to be more transparent; available evidence suggests its use has not always been within the rules.

By: Francesco Papadia and Leonardo Cadamuro Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 28, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

The ECB needs political guidance on secondary objectives

While EU Treaties clearly stipulate that the ECB “shall support the general objectives of the European Union”, it is not appropriate to simply stand by, wishing that the ECB will use its discretionary power to act on them. Political institutions of the EU should prioritise the secondary goals to legitimise the ECB’s action.

By: Pervenche Béres, Grégory Claeys, Nik de Boer, Panicos O. Demetriades, Sebastian Diessner, Stanislas Jourdan, Jens van ‘t Klooster and Vivien Schmidt Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 22, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

More Europe or less Europe?

Europe is often a ship with multiple captains. The boat moves forward in calm seas, but when the slightest wind puts it off course, it is not easy to steer that boat. It is not so much a question of more Europe rather than less, but of achieving ‘one Europe’. A ‘more-or-less Europe’ is an invitation to go nowhere.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 14, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

An alpine divide? Comparing economic cultures in Germany and Italy

A discussion of Italian and German macro-economic cultures and performances.

Speakers: Thomas Mayer, Patricia Mosser, Marianne Nessén, Hiroshi Nakaso, Francesco Papadia, André Sapir and Jean-Claude Trichet Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

How has COVID-19 affected inflation measurement in the euro area?

COVID-19 has complicated inflation measurement. Policymakers need to take this into account and should look at alternative measures of inflation to understand what is actually happening in the economy.

By: Grégory Claeys and Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 24, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The impact of COVID-19 on productivity: preliminary firm evidence

Online event organised in the framework of MICROPROD, a research project to improve our understanding of productivity, its drivers and the way we measure it.

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Maria Demertzis, Filippo di Mauro and Steffen Müller Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 18, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Central banks don’t have to pick winners and losers to fight climate change

Disclosures and financial regulation don’t get enough respect as tools to reduce emissions.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: March 11, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Can central banks save the planet?

“We are not going to lead our society to a low-carbon economy by continuing to finance the status quo. “

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 24, 2021
Load more posts