Blog Post

The Quarrel over Bernanke

What’s at stake: Ben Bernanke won a confirmation vote in the US Senate on Thursday for another four-year term as chairman of the Federal Reserve after suffering the biggest show of dissent since voting on the position began more than 30 years ago. Thirty senators, both Democratic and Republican, voted against Bernanke and 70 voted […]

By: Date: February 1, 2010 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

What’s at stake: Ben Bernanke won a confirmation vote in the US Senate on Thursday for another four-year term as chairman of the Federal Reserve after suffering the biggest show of dissent since voting on the position began more than 30 years ago. Thirty senators, both Democratic and Republican, voted against Bernanke and 70 voted for him. What remains to be seen is whether the highly charged lead up to the vote will change the debate when Congress looks to strengthen – or weaken – the Federal Reserve’s regulatory authority in the coming months. Amongst senators who supported Bernanke some want to reduce the Fed’s regulatory authority and delegate it to a new bank supervisor. Others are preparing to grant sweeping audit power over the Fed to the Government Accountability Office and want to give Congress more say on the governance of regional Fed banks.

James Hamilton says that he’s with Abraham Lincoln: don’t swap horses in the middle of the stream. Although he has concerns about some of the decisions the Fed has made, such as dropping the ball on regulation, keeping interest rates too low for too long over 2003-2005, taking some real risks with the Fed’s new balance sheet, and pretending the Fed had nothing to do with the commodity price boom of 2008, Bernanke’s "intellectual stamina" – a tireless energy to continually re-evaluate, receive new input, assess the consequences of what has happened so far, and decide what to do next – is so rare and so important that we need him for four more years.

Simon Johnson writes that Bernanke is an airline pilot who pulled off a miraculous landing, but didn’t do his pre-flight checks and doesn’t show any sign of being more careful in the future. Thank him if you want, but why would you fly with him again (or the airline that keeps him on)? Naked Capitalism writes that Bernanke is the neoclassical economist most responsible for burying Fisher’s accurate explanation of why the Great Depression occurred (growing debt). His extreme actions once the crisis hit have helped reduce the immediate impact of the crisis, but without the ignorance he helped spread about the real cause of the Great Depression, there would not have been a crisis in the first place.

Ed Glaeser writes that Bernanke’s signal achievement of safeguarding the financial system easily merits re-appointment. Switching to someone new would create unnecessary confusion and a costly transition during a time when all is far from well. Adam Posen has a paper where he assesses the effects of central bank governor appointments on financial-market expectations of monetary policy. New Federal Reserve Chairman Appointments move markets the most by far on average of any economy examined.

Paul Krugman favoured Bernanke’s reappointment only because rejecting him would have made the Fed’s policies worse, not better. While Mr. Bernanke seems insufficiently concerned about unemployment and too concerned about inflation, many of his colleagues are worse. Replacing him with someone less established, with less ability to sway the internal discussion, could end up strengthening the hands of the inflation hawks and doing even more damage to job creation. Brad DeLong doesn’t think there’s anything wrong with Ben Bernanke’s (private, intellectual, academic) analysis of the current situation. What is wrong is that the FOMC consensus is wrong – and Bernanke’s public statements reflect that wrong consensus. So he is much more interested in moving the FOMC consensus in a constructive direction – in getting two extremely articulate and thoughtful sensible macroeconomists added to the FOMC via recess appointments by Obama to fill the vacant Fed governorships as soon as possible – than in demanding that Bernanke’s public statements deviate from the FOMC consensus: a Fed chair who doesn’t reflect the consensus in public has less power to move the consensus in private.

Simon Gilchrist, Professor at Boston University says that term limits for Fed chairmen would accomplish the goal of giving the public a greater sense of oversight without creating undue political influence. It would also have the benefit of forcing the Fed to be more articulate about its specific goals and policies because it would de-emphasize the power of single chairman. Marvin Goodfriend, former director of research at the Richmond Fed official who is now a professor at Carnegie Mellon’s Tepper School of Business, is less enthusiastic. “Imposing term limits on a central bank chairman is not necessary or sufficient to produce effective monetary policy independence.

*Bruegel Economic Blogs Review is an information service that surveys external blogs. It does not survey Bruegel’s own publications, nor does it include comments by Bruegel authors.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

It’s hard to live in the city: Berlin’s rent freeze and the economics of rent control

A proposal in Berlin to ban increases in rent for the next five years sparked intense debate in Germany. Similar policies to the Mietendeckel are currently being discussed in London and NYC. All three proposals reflect and raise similar concerns – the increase in per-capita incomes is not keeping pace with increases in rents, but will a cap do more harm than good? We review recent views on the matter.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The breakdown of the covered interest rate parity condition

A textbook condition of international finance breaks down. Economic research identifies the interplay between divergent monetary policies and new financial regulation as the source of the puzzle, and generates concerns about unintended consequences for financing conditions and financial stability.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Bruegel Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 1, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The June Eurogroup meeting: Reflections on BICC

The Eurogroup met on June 13th to discuss the deepening of the economic and monetary union (EMU) and prepare the discussions for the Euro Summit. From the meeting came two main deliverables: an agreement over a budgetary instrument for competitiveness and convergence and the reform of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) treaty texts. We review economists’ first impressions.

By: Bruegel and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 24, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The campaign against ‘nonsense’ output gaps

A campaign against “nonsense” consensus output gaps has been launched on social media. It has triggered responses focusing on the implications of output gaps for fiscal policy under EU rules, especially for Italy. But the debate about the reliability of output-gap estimates is more wide-ranging.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Bruegel Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 17, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The inverted yield curve

Longer-term yields falling below shorter-term yields have historically preceded recessions. Last week, the US 10-year yield was 21 basis points below the 3-month yield, a feat last seen during the summer of 2007. Is the current yield curve a trustworthy barometer for future growth?

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 11, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The 'seven' ceiling: China's yuan in trade talks

Investors and the public have been looking at the renminbi with caution after the Trump administration threatened to increase duties on countries that intervene in the markets to devalue/undervalue their currency relative to the dollar. The fear is that China could weaponise its currency following the further increase in tariffs imposed by the United States in early May. What is the likelihood of this happening and what would be the consequences for the existing tensions with the United States, as well as for the global economy?

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 3, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The next ECB president

On May 28th, EU heads of state and government will start the nomination process for the next ECB president. Leaving names of possible candidates aside, this review tries to isolate the arguments about what qualifications the new president should have and what challenges he or she is likely to face.

By: Bruegel and Konstantinos Efstathiou Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 27, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The latest European growth-rate estimates

The quarterly growth rate of the euro area in Q1 2019 was 0.4% (1.5% annualized), considerably higher than the low growth rates of the previous two quarters. This blog reviews the reaction to the release of these numbers and the discussion they have triggered about the euro area’s economic challenges.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 20, 2019
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Is an electric car a cleaner car?

An article published by the Ifo Institute in Germany compares the carbon footprint of a battery-electric car to that of a diesel car, and argues a higher share of electric cars will not contribute to reducing German carbon dioxide emissions. Respondents rejected the authors’ calculations as unrealistic and biased, and pointed to a series of studies that conclude the opposite. We summarise the article and responses to it.

By: Michael Baltensperger Topic: Energy & Climate, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: May 13, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

All eyes on the Fed

Last week the US Federal Reserve left the federal funds rate unchanged and lowered the interest rate on excess reserves. We review economists’ recent views on the monetary policy conduct and priorities of the United States’ central bank system.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 6, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Is this blog post legal (under new EU copyright law)?

How new EU rules on using snippets from news publishers and on copyright infringement liability might affect circulation of information, revenue distribution, market power and EU business competitiveness.

By: Catarina Midões Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 8, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Secular stagnation and the future of economic stabilisation

Larry Summers’ and Łukasz Rachel’s most recent study documents a secular fall in neutral real rates in advanced economies. According to the authors, this fall would be even more marked in the absence of offsetting fiscal policies. Policymaking in a world of permanently low interest rates may be hard to navigate, especially in troubled waters. We review economists’ views on the matter

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 1, 2019
Load more posts