Blog Post

Blogs review: Tackling youth unemployment

What’s at stake: The latest unemployment figures for the 15 to 24 years old age group have made big waves in the media and made European policymakers busy designing a series of packages ahead of the special Heads of State summit scheduled on June 27-28. 

By: and Date: June 14, 2013 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

What’s at stake: The latest unemployment figures for the 15 to 24 years old age group have made big waves in the media and made European policymakers busy designing a series of packages ahead of the special Heads of State summit scheduled on June 27-28. Before reviewing the recent initiatives that will certainly serve as a basis for the policy announcements of the Heads of State summit, we discuss whether a youth unemployment rate of 50% mean that half the young population is unemployed and whether youth unemployment should be seen as a discrete problem deserving a special treatment.

What does a 50% youth unemployment rate mean?

Daniel Gros notes that a youth unemployment rate of 50% does not mean that half of the young population is unemployed. The youth-unemployment rate in Greece does not mean that close to two-thirds of young Greeks are unemployed. Only 9% of Greek teenagers are, for example, labor-market participants; two-thirds of that number cannot find a job. The unemployment ratio – the percentage of the unemployed in the reference population – among teenagers in Greece is thus less than 6%. Among those in the 20-24 age group [youth unemployment refers to those from 15 to 24 years old], the difference between the reported unemployment rate and the percentage of youth without a job and looking for one is less stark. But, even among this age group, one finds that the unemployment ratio is often about one-half of the widely reported unemployment rate.

Johannes Schweighofer writes that taking a broader picture into account, i.e. NEET rates, employment rates, unemployment ratios and unemployment rates, it would be fair to say: the labor market situation for young people is particularly favorable in the Netherlands, Austria, Denmark and Germany, according to an unweighted average of these indicators. But if labor market conditions for young people are defined relative to the overall labor market situation in a country to highlight the situation of 15-24 years old persons, Austria moves somewhat closer to the EU27 average. Seen from this perspective, the situation for young people is particularly bad in Sweden, Luxemburg, and Italy; this comes somewhat as a surprise.

Derek Tompson writes in The Atlantic that lurking under the rise of youth unemployment among the richest countries is an even scarier trend – the rise of long-term youth unemployment. About half of Europe’s unemployed youth have been out of work for more than six months, according to 2011 data.

Is youth unemployment a discrete problem?

Daniel Gros writes that there are several reasons to doubt that youth unemployment is a discrete problem meriting special treatment. In those countries where the problem makes the biggest headlines, youth unemployment accounts for less than a quarter of overall unemployment. By contrast, youth unemployment contributes relatively much more (about 40%) to overall unemployment in countries like Sweden and the UK. One could argue that the latter two should worry about their youth unemployment more than Spain or Greece should. The fact that youth unemployment is just a part of a larger problem leads to the real policy question: Why should officials spend limited time, energy, and public funding specifically on unemployed young people, rather than on all of the unemployed? Europe has a general macroeconomic problem, owing to demand factors that interact with a rigid labor market, rather than a specific youth-unemployment problem. This implies that there is no need for ad hoc measures for young people, which merely risk overloading welfare systems with even more exemptions and special rules.

Paul Krugman writes that you hear talk about a “new normal” of much higher unemployment, but all the reasons given for this alleged new normal, such as the supposed mismatch between workers’ skills and the demands of the modern economy, fall apart when subjected to careful scrutiny. If Washington would reverse its destructive budget cuts, if the Fed would show the “Rooseveltian resolve” (see our previous issue on the economics of a regime change) that Ben Bernanke demanded of Japanese officials back when he was an independent economist, we would quickly discover that there’s nothing normal or necessary about mass long-term unemployment.

Types of policies and policy principles

In its report Global Employment Trends for Youth 2013, the ILO ­discusses five key policy areas to promote decent work for youth:

  1. Employment and economic policies to increase aggregate demand and improve access to finance;
  2. Education and training to ease the school-to-work transition and to prevent labor market mismatches;
  3. Labor market policies to target employment of disadvantaged youth;
  4. Entrepreneurship and self-employment to assist potential young entrepreneurs;
  5. Labor rights that are based on international labor standards to ensure that young people receive equal treatment.

In a recent policy brief, the Kiel Institute argue that any employment policies targeted at youth need to take possible crowding-out effects for other age groups into account. IDEA runs the typical pros and cons about whether youth unemployment merits a special treatment.

A short guide to recent initiatives

EU leaders will certainly based their actions on a number of ongoing initiatives:

  • The Youth Employment Initiative (2013) proposed at the EU Council of Ministers’ meeting in February, which aims to reinforce and accelerate measures that were recommended in a Youth Employment Package (2012) in December
  • Youth Employment Package (2012), which is the follow-up to the actions on youth laid out in the wider Employment Package. The YU package includes:

          a.      A proposal for a Council Recommendation to introduce a Youth Guarantee (The Youth Guarantee Recommendation was adopted by the EU’s Council of Ministers on 22 April 2013. The Youth Guarantee, based on experience in Austria and Finland, seeks to ensure that all young people up to age 25 receive a quality offer of a job, continued education, an apprenticeship or a traineeship within four months of leaving formal education or becoming unemployed

          b.      A Quality Framework for Traineeships

          c.       A European Alliance for Apprenticeships

  • Youth on the Move, which is a comprehensive package of policy initiatives on education and employment for young people in Europe
  • EU Skills Panorama, which is an EU-wide tool gathering information on skills needs, forecasting and developments in the labor market

For a more detailed presentation of these ongoing initiatives, we recommend BrusselsDiplomatic.

Specific proposals on mobility

In a recent speech, Androulla Vassiliou – Commissioner for Education, Culture, Multilingualism and Youth – argued that in spite of high unemployment, the number of job vacancies in EU is increasing.  This paradox reveals a mismatch between the skills provided and the needs of the world of work, and so the failure of our education systems to a certain extent. The EU Skills Panorama points that vacancies are hard to fill in the health, ICT, engineering, sales and finance sectors, the new European Vacancy and Recruitment Report says.

Androulla Vassiliou also outlined that the feature of the European Commission proposal Erasmus for All programme, which is now under discussion by the Council and aims at increasing mobility within the EU. About twice as many people as now could get the chance to study or train abroad with a grant from Erasmus for All. Among them would be nearly 3 million higher education and vocational students. Full-time Masters’ students would also benefit from a new loan guarantee scheme set up with the European Investment Bank Group.

Specific proposals on training

Bob Hancké writes that there is one country in Europe where, for highly idiosyncratic reasons, an emphasis on training might be relevant: Spain. Over the last 15 years (i.e. more than half of a generation) many young people forewent higher education in favor of higher wages in relatively low-skilled sectors such as construction and tourism. The country is the only one, in fact, where the number of people graduating from universities has fallen over the last 20 years.

Timothy Taylor notes that Germany and Switzerland educate roughly 53 percent and 66 percent of students, respectively, in a system that combines apprenticeships with classroom education — the dual system. This approach brings young people into the labor force more quickly and easily. The United States is an outlier: By international standards and official definitions, it has virtually no vocational education and training program.

Specific proposals on labor market segmentation

In a recent CESifo report, Giuseppe Bertola, John Driffill, Harold James, Hans-Werner Sinn, Jan-Egbert Sturm and Ákos Valentinyi write that the two tier labor markets that have emerged in Spain, Portugal, Greece, and to some degree Italy, have thrown the burden of job cuts onto a particular segment of the labor market, those individuals on temporary contracts. Meanwhile, the heavily protected workers in regular jobs feel little pressure from the existence of many unemployed persons to moderate wage claims or change working practices to increase productivity.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Artificial intelligence’s great impact on low and middle-skilled jobs

Artificial intelligence and machine learning will significantly transform low-skilled jobs that have not yet been negatively affected by past technological change.

By: Sybrand Brekelmans and Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: June 29, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Reading tea leaves from China’s two sessions: Large monetary and fiscal stimulus and still no growth guarantee

The announcement of a large stimulus without a growth target indicates that China’s recovery is far from complete.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 25, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The European Union’s SURE plan to safeguard employment: a small step forward

The new EU instrument to mitigate unemployment risks during an emergency (SURE) is too modest to have a significant impact the COVID-19 crisis beyond being a first step in the overall recovery plan.

By: Grégory Claeys Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 20, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Rationale and limitations of SURE

This event will discuss SURE, a new European Union instrument for temporary ‘Support to mitigate Unemployment Risks in an Emergency'

Speakers: Roel Beetsma, Elena Carletti, Grégory Claeys and Gilles Mourre Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 15, 2020
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Brief

Rebooting Europe: a framework for a post COVID-19 economic recovery

COVID-19 has triggered a severe recession and policymakers in European Union countries are providing generous, largely indiscriminate, support to companies. As the recession gets deeper, a more comprehensive strategy is needed. This should be based on four principles: viability of supported entities, fairness, achieving societal goals, and giving society a share in future profits. The effort should be structured around equity and recovery funds with borrowing at EU level.

By: Julia Anderson, Simone Tagliapietra and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 13, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

How COVID-19 is laying bare inequality

COVID-19 is laying bare socio-economic inequalities and could exacerbate them in the near future. The virus is a risk factor particularly for those at the lower end of the income distribution, who are vulnerable to the interaction of the shock with income, socio-economic and urban inequalities.

By: Enrico Bergamini Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 31, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The quality and quantity of work in the age of AI

At this event, the panelists will discuss the implications of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market and the future of work in general.

Speakers: Robert Atkinson, Anna Byhovskaya, Maria Demertzis, Carl Frey and Daniel Samaan Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 5, 2020
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

External Publication

Manufacturing employment, international trade, and China

The decline in manufacturing employment is often seen as a major reason for rising inequality, social tensions, and the slump of entire communities. With the rise of national populists and protectionists in recent years, the issue has become even more prominent.

By: Uri Dadush and Abdelaziz Ait Ali Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: November 28, 2019
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Improving regulatory policy formulation and institutional resilience in Europe

Are large differences in the resilience of individual economies related to differences in the quality of country-level institutions that shape the absorption and response to these shocks? At this event we'll discuss the evolution of labour markets, and the role of institutional design and good process.

Speakers: Arup Banerji, Maria Demertzis, J. Scott Marcus, Céline Kauffmann and Rogier van den Brink Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: November 13, 2019
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

AI, robots and platform workers: What future for European welfare states?

At this event, we launch the study, "Digitalisation and European welfare states", authored by Georgios Petropoulos, J. Scott Marcus, Nicolas Moës, and Enrico Bergamini.

Speakers: Michael Froman, J. Scott Marcus, Monika Queisser, Thiébaut Weber and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: France Stratégie, 20 avenue de Ségur Date: July 9, 2019
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Blueprint

Digitalisation and European welfare states

EU policymakers must find answers to pressing questions: if technology has a negative impact on labour income, how will the welfare state be funded? How can workers’ welfare rights be adequately secured? A team of Bruegel scholars, with the support of the Mastercard Center for Inclusive Growth, has taken on these questions.

By: Georgios Petropoulos, J. Scott Marcus, Nicolas Moës and Enrico Bergamini Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 9, 2019
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

It’s hard to live in the city: Berlin’s rent freeze and the economics of rent control

A proposal in Berlin to ban increases in rent for the next five years sparked intense debate in Germany. Similar policies to the Mietendeckel are currently being discussed in London and NYC. All three proposals reflect and raise similar concerns – the increase in per-capita incomes is not keeping pace with increases in rents, but will a cap do more harm than good? We review recent views on the matter.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2019
Load more posts