Opinion

A European approach to fund the coronavirus cost is in the interest of all

We had not seen a common challenge as clear as this pandemic. The sum of national actions and programs is likely to be insufficient.

By: , , , , , , , and Date: April 6, 2020 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

This opinion piece was originally published in El País and Corriere della Sera.

El País logo

Corriere della Sera logo

 

To reduce the economic fallout from the coronavirus crisis, massive fiscal support will be needed. Without sufficient support, GDP will fall much further and the recovery will be slower, as many more companies and productive structures will have been destroyed. Lower than necessary GDP resulting from a lack of fiscal support would lead to long-term unemployment and even to higher debt ratios.

There has hardly been a clearer common challenge than the coronavirus pandemic. The sum of actions taken by individual countries is likely to be insufficient. Solidarity and a joint European response are needed.

The health of every country depends directly on public health in surrounding countries. No country can remain virus-free for long when its neighbours have infected people. And cross-border contact is vital for our highly-integrated economies. The greatest share of trade for European Union countries is with other EU countries, via the internal market. The economic vitality of our partner countries therefore matters hugely for all of us.

Most fiscal measures so far, however, have been national, and the extent to which northern EU countries are able to spend more money than their southern neighbours is striking. Germany announced an aid package in excess of 4% of its GDP and hundreds of billions of guarantees. France is taking major measures and the Dutch economy has quite rightly been propped up with a package that could reach €65 billion. But Italy produced a rather small package — much less than required to fend off lasting damage. Also the Spanish response is smaller than the size of the health crisis would suggest it should be. Market pressure and fear of a new euro-area crisis might be behind more muted fiscal responses.

Pan-European backing for a strong and joint crisis response is crucial now. The fight against COVID-19 must not force the euro area into crisis. Doubts about the creditworthiness of individual countries can, in financial markets, lead to self-fulfilling prophecies. Investors demand higher returns because of the perceived risks, raising interest on government debt. This increases financing problems for countries, leading in turn to even higher risk premiums, and the spiral starts again.

We need strong political commitment so that self-fulfilling prophecies don’t materialise. The European Central Bank is doing the right thing and should receive full and explicit political support. But politicians cannot leave the job of handling this crisis only to the ECB. Democratic legitimacy and direction are needed for the European Union. Government leaders and parliaments must now agree on a strong programme for all of Europe. In particular, they must provide support to the most vulnerable and boost investment across Europe, to ensure recovery from this crisis.

The first steps have already been taken. The European Commission has found tens of billions of euros within its current budget, and budgetary requirements have been relaxed. The ECB has announced it will stimulate the economy by, among other measures, buying up more than €1 trillion of debt. Recent ECB decisions have been particularly weighty and appropriate, notably the creation of the Pandemic Emergency Purchase Programme.

A solution is feasible for this specific, unique crisis. No permanent debt guarantee mechanism is needed, nor is the mutualisation of existing debt. But joint financing to tackle COVID-19 and manage the recovery phase is necessary. The precise vehicle is a secondary question, even though it is a politically charged one. Whatever the approach, the ECB should provide backing. But it is up to government leaders to take charge and provide the necessary legitimacy for a crisis response that will shape our common future.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

A Global Pandemic Alarm Bell

The appearance of new strains of the coronavirus in the United Kingdom, South Africa, and Brazil has given the world no choice but to design and implement a comprehensive global strategy. So, what's stopping that from happening?

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 26, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

疫情對全球經濟的結構性改變或比想像的更深

現在是時候重新思考我們目前經濟模式中的基本原理,來減輕這些影響。

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 21, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Where did the vaccine strategy go wrong?

“We have to open our mind, we have to look internationally. Because if we don’t, COVID-19 is going to stay with us.”

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 20, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Monetary and fiscal policy interaction in times of Next Generation EU

Could Next Generation EU enable a better coordination of monetary and fiscal policy

Speakers: Lorenzo Bini Smaghi, Grégory Claeys and Hans Vijlbrief Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: January 20, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

What do vaccination passports mean for Europe?

To the extent that vaccination against COVID-19 stops individuals infecting others, restrictions on vaccinated individuals’ rights should be lifted: fundamental freedoms should not be limited unnecessarily. Nevertheless, acceptance of vaccination passports depends on whether the vaccination allocation timeline is perceived as fair.

By: Lionel Jeanrenaud, Mario Mariniello and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 20, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Résilience : la nouvelle boussole

Pour surmonter le choc de la pandémie de Covid-19, l’économiste écarte, dans sa chronique, l’idée d’un repli protectionniste, mais suggère de passer d’un objectif de réduction des coûts à celui de la réduction des risques.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 18, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

A matter of life and death: governments must speed up vaccination

COVID-19 vaccination in Europe and the United States is moving too slowly and is failing to prevent avoidable death and economic disruption. More must be done to accelerate the campaign by targeting those most at risk.

By: Uri Dadush Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Corporate insolvencies during COVID-19: keeping calm before the storm

Measures in major economies have protected companies from COVID-19 related insolvency, but have also protected weak firms. Nevertheless, support should remain as long as necessary, while cumbersome insolvency processes should be reformed for the long term.

By: Grégory Claeys, Mia Hoffmann and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 7, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Has the European Union squandered its coronavirus vaccination opportunity?

The European Union’s purchases of frontrunner coronavirus vaccines are insufficient for the population’s near-term needs. The shortfall could have healthcare consequences and might delay economic reopening. Lessons should be learned for future pandemics.

By: J. Scott Marcus Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Date: January 6, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

When the future changes the past: fiscal indicator revisions

The 2020 pandemic economic shock has led to reassessment of fiscal policy measures in 2018 and earlier, because of faulty measurement of unobserved output gaps and structural balances. The current period of suspension of EU fiscal rules should be used to design a better fiscal framework.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 5, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Europe's disappointing investment deal with China

Why rush a deal that is so inherently complex?

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 4, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Happy New Year?

A recovery from the COVID-19 recession is underway though the suffering is far from over, especially for the most vulnerable. Inequality is both a consequence of the pandemic and a cause of its severity. Many countries need comprehensive policy change to address its worst effects.

By: Uri Dadush Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: December 23, 2020
Load more posts