Blog Post

The then and now of tightening cycles

What’s at stake: This week the Fed will be considering whether to raise its interest rate for the first time in nearly a decade. In a volatile context, the outcome of the struggle between those who want to normalize policy ASAP and those who worry about moving too quickly will be watched closely as it could provide clues on the likely destination and speed of travel towards normalization.

By: and Date: September 14, 2015 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance


The significance of the initial rate hike

Eric S. Rosengren writes that macroeconomic models of the economy overwhelmingly suggest little impact on the broader economic landscape from moving the timing of initial interest rate hikes forward or backward by a couple of months. However, the future trajectory of interest rate increases – that is, whether increases to more normalized levels occur quickly or more gradually – is, by contrast, likely to have a meaningful impact on employment and inflation.

Martin Wolf writes that any increase would be significant: first, it would indicate the Fed’s belief that the policy can be “normalized” after almost seven years of post-crisis healing; second, it would indicate the beginning of a tightening cycle. One of the reasons for believing the latter is that this is how the Fed has historically behaved: the last such cycle began with rates at 1 per cent in June 2004 and ended with rates at 5.25 per cent two years later. Without doubt, beginning a tightening cycle for the first time in more than 11 years would be a significant moment. It would also signal more than an immediate rise in rates. Lawrence Summers agree and write that arguments of the “one and done” variety or arguments that the Fed can safely raise rates by 25 BP as long as it’s clear that there is no commitment to a series of hikes are specious.

A quick history of tightening episodes

The Economist writes that there have been 12 American tightening cycles since 1955, and they have lasted just under two years on average. In five of the past seven instances, however, the Fed has relented in a year or less. The inflationary periods of the 1970s and early 1980s saw the biggest increases in interest rates; that helped push the mean increase over the 12 cycles to five percentage points. But the median change may be a better guide to the coming cycle; it stands at just over three percentage points.

BEBR_14_09_15_1

Source: NY Fed

Tracy Manzi writes that rate increases have historically led to greater equity market volatility, but they have rarely signaled the end of a bull market. The stock market continued to rise in the last five tightening cycles. Most bear markets in bonds have occurred during Fed rate hike cycles. The 2004 tightening cycle was a rare exception. In 2004, long-term interest rates remained remarkably stable, trading in a very narrow range, despite the Federal Reserve’s interest rate hikes from a low of 1.0% to 4.25%. In most instances, long-term interest rates should rise when policy makers increase short-term interest rates.

The 1994 episode

Martin Hochstein writes that the 1994 episode is a good example of what could go awry from a financial markets perspective when central banks start to tighten monetary policy. Though in early 1994 Chairman Greenspan had already been hinting at potential rate hikes for some time, the timing and magnitude of the subsequent monetary tightening came as a major surprise to analysts. Obviously this surprise spilled over into the financial markets. Over the course of the cycle almost all asset classes suffered losses, with global and Emerging Market equities hit the hardest. But US equities lost ground as well, temporarily losing almost 10 % before finishing the cycle at minus 2 %.

The Economist writes that 1994 is also a pertinent example because the Fed had kept rates low for a long time in order to help the financial sector, which was still recovering from the savings-and-loan crisis of the late 1980s. When it finally did begin to raise rates, the pace of tightening seemed to catch many investors by surprise, particularly those investing in mortgage-backed bonds.

This time is different

Martin Wolf writes that the likely destination and speed of travel are enigmas because the US economy is not behaving normally. After nearly seven years of zero interest rates, the inflation of which critics warned is invisible. This is not normal. Lawrence Summers writes that, if rates were now 4 per cent, there wouldn’t be much pressure to raise them. That pressure comes from a sense that the economy has substantially normalized during six years of recovery, and so the extraordinary stimulus of zero interest rates should be withdrawn.

BEBR_14_09_15_2

Source: Boston Fed

Eric S. Rosengren writes that there are very good reasons to expect a much more gradual normalization process than occurred in the previous two tightening cycles. Importantly, this is not just my view; the Summary of Economic Projections – the “SEP” – released after the June FOMC meeting, which incorporates the federal funds rate expectations for all the FOMC participants assuming appropriate monetary policy, indicates that Federal Reserve policymakers expect a gradual tightening cycle. The implied path of the SEP is much slower than the path taken in 2004, with the federal funds rate increasing at roughly half the pace of that tightening episode. This significantly slower pace reflects that lingering headwinds resonating from the financial crisis, and continued low inflation rates both here and abroad, likely require a different path of tightening.

 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
14:15

Monetary and macroeconomic policies at the crossroads

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session we would like to discuss monetary and macroeconomic policies after Covid-19.

Speakers: Grégory Claeys, Per Callesen, Gita Gopinath, Jorge Sicilia Serrano and Lawrence H. Summers Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: PALAIS DES ACADEMIES, RUE DUCALE 1
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

What to expect from the ECB’s monetary policy strategy review?

Emphasis will be placed on greening monetary policy and clarifying the ECB's price stability objective, but is this enough?

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: June 23, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

External Publication

European Parliament

What Are the Effects of the ECB’s Negative Interest Rate Policy?

This paper explores the potential effects (and side effects) of negative rates in theory and examines the evidence to determine what these effects have been in practice in the euro area.

By: Grégory Claeys Topic: European Parliament, Finance & Financial Regulation, Testimonies Date: June 9, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

After COVID-19: a most wanted recovery

This event, jointly organised with ISPI, as the National Coordinator and Chair of the T20 Italy, is part of the T20 Spring Roundtables and it will focus on strategies for a swift and sustainable economic recovery for Europe.

Speakers: Franco Bruni, Maria Demertzis, Elena Flores, Paul De Grauwe, Christian Odendahl, Miguel Otero-Iglesias and André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 19, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Africa's battle with COVID-19

How can we ensure a worldwide balanced and inclusive recovery from the Covid pandemic?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: April 21, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

How has COVID-19 affected inflation measurement in the euro area?

COVID-19 has complicated inflation measurement. Policymakers need to take this into account and should look at alternative measures of inflation to understand what is actually happening in the economy.

By: Grégory Claeys and Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 24, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Low interest rates: a transatlantic phenomenon

Structural factors are putting downward pressure on rates: is it time for macroeconomic policy to play second fiddle in managing demand?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 10, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

Low interest rates in Europe and the US: one trend, two stories

Interest rates have been on a long-term decline, associated with declining productivity growth. To tackle this, the priorities are to reduce market concentration and, in Europe, change the financing model.

By: Maria Demertzis and Nicola Viegi Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: March 10, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Can central banks save the planet?

“We are not going to lead our society to a low-carbon economy by continuing to finance the status quo. “

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 24, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

A brown or a green European Central Bank?

The European Central Bank portfolio is skewed towards the brown economy, reflecting a bias in the market. Can and should the bank deviate from the market allocation?

By: Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: Energy & Climate Date: February 24, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Central banking’s brave new world

Ever since the 2008 financial crisis, central bankers have been busy developing new policy instruments to fight fires and ward off emerging threats. Nonetheless, many secretly dreamed of returning to the good old days of cautious conservatism (with financial stability taken seriously).

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 24, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Continuing fiscal support and the risk of inflation

Ongoing fiscal support in the United States is not expected to provoke inflation risks. There are no immediate inflationary risks in the euro area either.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 17, 2021
Load more posts