Blog Post

Must one repay one’s debts?

For months now a row about sovereign debt restructuring has been raging between those who insist that Greece must continue to honour its signature and those for whom its debt should be partly cancelled. As is often the case in Europe, the crossfire of contradictory official and non-official statements has been throwing markets into turmoil. […]

By: Date: June 5, 2011 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

For months now a row about sovereign debt restructuring has been raging between those who insist that Greece must continue to honour its signature and those for whom its debt should be partly cancelled. As is often the case in Europe, the crossfire of contradictory official and non-official statements has been throwing markets into turmoil. Confusion abounds. Some clarity is needed. 

The first question is whether Greece is still solvent. This is harder to judge than for a firm because a sovereign state possesses the power to tax. In theory, all that is needed in order to get out of debt is to increase taxes and cut spending. But the power to tax is not limitless. A government determined at any cost to honour its debts ends up imposing a much higher level of tax revenue than the level of services it supplies, and at a certain point this discrepancy becomes socially and politically unsustainable.   

Among advanced economies, none (except oil-rich Norway) has managed to durably achieve a primary surplus (revenue less non-interest expenditure) exceeding six percent of GDP. Even if the Greek government were to succeed in stabilising its debt ratio, it would be at a level (it is set to reach soon 150 percent of GDP) too high to convince creditors to extend lending.  Greece will need to reduce its debt ratio considerably before it can return to the market, which implies – even under an optimistic scenario – creating a primary surplus in excess of eight percentage points of GDP. This is too much for a democratic country, and one where the tax burden is very unequally shared. Greece is in fact insolvent.  

The second question is whether it is very serious not to repay one’s debts. One camp notes that no advanced country has ever ventured to do this for decades and that is the reason for the positive reputation they still enjoy. It would only take one member of the euro area to embark on this path and all the rest would be under suspicion. For those adhering to this thesis, contracts must at all costs be respected. But the other camp is calling for the creditors who triggered the excessive debt to be punished for their imprudence.  Lenders must suffer losses so that in future they price sovereign risk more accurately – in other words so that they make reckless governments pay higher interest rates.

Both lines of argument are valid, but the fact is that those countries which have restructured their debt have not found themselves overly blighted by it. Far from being banished from bond markets, they have generally bounced back quickly, as investors like a sinner who returns to solvency better than a paragon of virtue on the verge of suffocation. Twenty years ago Poland negotiated a reduction in its debt and came off better than a Hungary keen to protect its reputation. In this regard, debt reduction is not fatal.   

The third question is whether a Greek default would be a financial catastrophe. Two channels are at work, one internal and one external. First, government bonds are the reference asset for banks and insurers because they are easily tradable and ensure liquidity. It is therefore obvious that any doubt about the value of such bonds could cause turmoil. The solvency and access to refinancing of the Greek banking system would be hit. Externally, in turn, other European banks would be affected.  And, especially, contagion would threaten other countries in a fragile state – at least Ireland, Portugal, Spain.    

So we are in a serious situation. This makes it even more difficult to understand the attitude of central banks which, instead of trying to find a way to cushion the possible impact of such a shock, are raising the spectre of a chain reaction and invoking the collapse of Lehman Brothers in September 2008. They are threatening to punish any restructuring by cutting banks’ access to liquidity. But if Greece is not solvent, either the EU must assume its debts or the risk will hang over it like a sword of Damocles.  By refusing a planned and orderly restructuring, the euro area is exposing itself to the risk of a messy default.  

But Europe is not obliged to choose between catastrophe and mutualisation of debt. The best route – admittedly a narrow road – is initially to beef up the financing programme for Athens while at the same time trying not to let private creditors withdraw too easily (which looks like happening at the moment). But this breathing space must be used for more than simply buying time. It should be used, first, to allow other countries in difficulty to regain or consolidate their financial credibility and, second, to pave the way for an orderly  restructuring of Greek debt. So : yes to gaining time, but let’s put it to good use.

A version of this column was published on Le Monde on 6th June 2011.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article
 

Blog Post

Will European Union recovery spending be enough to fill digital investment gaps?

The recovery facility will boost digital transformation, but questions remain whether it will be sufficient to achieve Europe’s digital ambitions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, J. Scott Marcus and Alkiviadis Tzaras Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 20, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

A new direction for the European Union’s half-hearted semiconductor strategy

The EU needs a more targeted strategy to increase its presence in this strategic and thriving sector, building on its existing strengths, while accommodating its relatively low domestic needs.

By: Niclas Poitiers and Pauline Weil Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Fair vaccine access is a goal Europe cannot afford to miss – July update

European countries must do more to tackle the vaccine uptake gap. Vaccination data should be published at the maximum granularity level so researchers and local decision-makers can monitor progress.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Mario Mariniello Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

SPACs in the gap

Special-purpose acquisition vehicles could fill a gap in European equity markets and lure risk-averse investors off the sidelines.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1
12:30

The EU recovery fund - state of play and outlook

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 1- In this session we will discuss the EU recovery fund, its state of play and outlook.

Speakers: Nadia Calviño, Karolina Ekholm and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:00

Conversation on the recovery programmes

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session, we discuss the recovery programmes.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Mehreen Khan and Tadeusz Kościński Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
13:00

European banks: under global competitive pressure?

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - European banks have lost stature and remain generally low-profitability, low-valuation in comparison to their global peers. Is that a problem? If so, what can EU policymakers do to address it?

Speakers: José Antonio Álvarez Álvarez, Mairead McGuinness and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
15:45

Blending physical and virtual: shaping the new workplace

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - This panel will cover the changes the COVID-19 pandemic made to our workplaces, and what to expect in the near future.

Speakers: Nicholas Bloom, Michael Froman, Mario Mariniello, Sara Matthieu and Luca Visentini Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Academy Palace
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
09:00

The role of the EU's trade strategy for an inclusive and sustainable recovery

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - We are delighted to welcome Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People to talk about Europe's trade strategy.

Speakers: Valdis Dombrovskis and Alicia García-Herrero Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Conference on the Future of Europe: envisioning EU citizens engagement

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - Panellists will discuss different options and what they may entail while revisiting the debates on the future of Europe at national and EU-level that have been conducted thus far.

Speakers: Caroline de Gruyter, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Niclas Poitiers and György Szapáry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts