“Unanimous” is the new black

As it was largely anticipated, no new measures were announced Thursday at the ECB meeting. But sometimes words can be as important as facts.

By: Date: November 25, 2014 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

One month has passed since the announcement of the asset purchase programmes, but pressure for action has not eased at all, for the ECB. Besides witnessing weak figures for the economic and inflation outlook, Frankfurt now finds itself in between two forces pulling in opposite directions: on one hand the FED – which is ending its stimulus – and on the other hand the Bank of Japan – which unexpectedly decided to expand its QE programme, pledging to grow the monetary base by ¥80tn ($700bn) a year.

But before taking any additional steps, the ECB needs first to assess the effectiveness of recently agreed measures, on which it has pledged quite a big reputational stake. Therefore, things are moving slowly in Frankfurt. €3.1bn in new purchases were settled last week under the third Covered bond Purchase Programme (CBPP3) and the ECB announced the appointment of executing managers for the ABS programme, which is expected to start later in November. But no additional details were revealed on the latter, most notably on whether the political opposition to purchases of ABS mezzanine tranches can realistically be overcome.

ECB watchers were however not denied their monthly dose of satisfaction. Expectations this month were high for a sparkling Q&A session, after a Reuters’ article reported the existence of strong disagreement within the Governing Council and suggested some members intended to raise openly their concerns with Draghi’s “management style”, on the occasion of an informal working dinner on Wednesday.

According to Reuters, one of the points that had caused more discontent within the Governing Council was Draghi’s statement, during the past press conferences, that the ECB’s new measures would be expected to stir the Central Bank’s balance sheet back to the level it had in 2012. Such announcement, which allegedly had not been agreed beforehand, was welcomed very well by the markets and it goes without saying that the ECB’s backtracking on it could have been disastrous.

But Mr. Draghi was not caught off guard and during the press conference he clearly showed to have internal dissent under control. He not only repeated the point about balance sheet expansion, but he did so during his introductory remarks, rather than the Q&A session. This might look like an irrelevant detail, but in Central Bank’s jargon – where every single words matters – it actually makes a substantial difference. The introductory statement is signed off by the whole Governing Council, as the ECB president himself stressed a number of times Thursday. Therefore, the inclusion of the controversial point in the introductory statement is clearly meant to show that the ECB’s latest measures are fully endorsed.

Draghi also dispelled any remaining ambiguity about the size of the balance sheet increase, clarifying that the 2012 reference is to the level reached after the second LTRO, when the ECB balance sheet was at its highest. This clarification implies a €1 trillion increase to be achieved, and it is quite important from a communication perspective, because it acts as a commitment device. On Thursday, the central bank implicitly tied its credibility to a specific target: markets know that now, and their expectations will need to be fulfilled.

Unless it wants to put its credibility at stake, the ECB will then be forced to do more, if the currently agreed measures were to prove inefficient to reach the target or the inflation outlook were to worsen. Draghi reinforced his dovish message on Thursday by saying the Governing Council unanimously acknowledges it, and by suggesting that preparatory work for this eventuality is already underway at that ECB. No hint was given about the timing, but all eyes will obviously be pointed at December Eurosystem projections. Concerning what could be done, the door was left completely open.

Despite apparent lack of action, the ECB meeting was not an irrelevant one. Draghi clearly showed that divergences of views within the Governing Council will not be allowed to put the credibility of the ECB at stake. The message delivered on Thursday was overall extremely dovish and clarified that, no matter how we got here, we should from now on consider the target of €1trillion balance sheet increase as set in stone. Such explicit commitment reinforces the credibility of the additional claim that further measures would be introduced if the target could not be reached. But it also raises the pressure on the ECB. As the bar of expectation as never been higher, divergences are likely to re-surface in the politically complex environment the ECB has to navigate through, promising much more interesting developments for the months ahead. 

Republished with permission from MNI News.

Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read about event More on this topic

Upcoming Event

May - Jun


Improving understanding of productivity, its drivers and the way we measure it.

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Peter Bøegh Nielsen, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Wolfhard Kaus, Javier Miranda, Steffen Müller, Hannu Piekkola, Verena Plümpe, Niclas Poitiers, Andrea Roventini, Gianluca Santoni, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi and Markus Zimmermann Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author



Taming inflation?

What are the implications of prolonged inflation?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: May 25, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 25, 2022
Read about event

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article Download PDF

Policy Contribution

European governance

Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union

Policymakers must think coherently about the joint implications of their actions, from sanctions on Russia to subsidies and transfers to their own citizens, and avoid taking measures that contradict each other. This is what we try to do in this Policy Contribution, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects of relevance for Europe.

By: Olivier Blanchard and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic

External Publication

What drives implementation of the European Union’s policy recommendations to its member countries?

Article published in the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author

Working Paper

Measuring the intangible economy to address policy challenges

The purpose of the first work package of the MICROPROD project was to improve the firm-level data infrastructure, expand the measurement of intangible assets and enable cross-country analyses of these productivity trends.

By: Marie Le Mouel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic

Past Event

Past Event

Macroeconomic and financial stability in changing times: conversation with Andrew Bailey

Guntram Wolff will be joined in conversation by Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

Speakers: Andrew Bailey and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 28, 2022
Read article


European governance

How to reconcile increased green public investment needs with fiscal consolidation

The EU’s ambitious emissions reduction targets will require a major increase in green investments. This column considers options for increasing public green investment when major consolidations are needed after the fiscal support provided during the pandemic. The authors make the case for a green golden rule allowing green investment to be funded by deficits that would not count in the fiscal rules. Concerns about ‘greenwashing’ could be addressed through a narrow definition of green investments and strong institutional scrutiny, while countries with debt sustainability concerns could initially rely only on NGEU for their green investment.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Load more posts