Opinion

“Unanimous” is the new black

As it was largely anticipated, no new measures were announced Thursday at the ECB meeting. But sometimes words can be as important as facts.

By: Date: November 25, 2014 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

One month has passed since the announcement of the asset purchase programmes, but pressure for action has not eased at all, for the ECB. Besides witnessing weak figures for the economic and inflation outlook, Frankfurt now finds itself in between two forces pulling in opposite directions: on one hand the FED – which is ending its stimulus – and on the other hand the Bank of Japan – which unexpectedly decided to expand its QE programme, pledging to grow the monetary base by ¥80tn ($700bn) a year.

But before taking any additional steps, the ECB needs first to assess the effectiveness of recently agreed measures, on which it has pledged quite a big reputational stake. Therefore, things are moving slowly in Frankfurt. €3.1bn in new purchases were settled last week under the third Covered bond Purchase Programme (CBPP3) and the ECB announced the appointment of executing managers for the ABS programme, which is expected to start later in November. But no additional details were revealed on the latter, most notably on whether the political opposition to purchases of ABS mezzanine tranches can realistically be overcome.

ECB watchers were however not denied their monthly dose of satisfaction. Expectations this month were high for a sparkling Q&A session, after a Reuters’ article reported the existence of strong disagreement within the Governing Council and suggested some members intended to raise openly their concerns with Draghi’s “management style”, on the occasion of an informal working dinner on Wednesday.

According to Reuters, one of the points that had caused more discontent within the Governing Council was Draghi’s statement, during the past press conferences, that the ECB’s new measures would be expected to stir the Central Bank’s balance sheet back to the level it had in 2012. Such announcement, which allegedly had not been agreed beforehand, was welcomed very well by the markets and it goes without saying that the ECB’s backtracking on it could have been disastrous.

But Mr. Draghi was not caught off guard and during the press conference he clearly showed to have internal dissent under control. He not only repeated the point about balance sheet expansion, but he did so during his introductory remarks, rather than the Q&A session. This might look like an irrelevant detail, but in Central Bank’s jargon – where every single words matters – it actually makes a substantial difference. The introductory statement is signed off by the whole Governing Council, as the ECB president himself stressed a number of times Thursday. Therefore, the inclusion of the controversial point in the introductory statement is clearly meant to show that the ECB’s latest measures are fully endorsed.

Draghi also dispelled any remaining ambiguity about the size of the balance sheet increase, clarifying that the 2012 reference is to the level reached after the second LTRO, when the ECB balance sheet was at its highest. This clarification implies a €1 trillion increase to be achieved, and it is quite important from a communication perspective, because it acts as a commitment device. On Thursday, the central bank implicitly tied its credibility to a specific target: markets know that now, and their expectations will need to be fulfilled.

Unless it wants to put its credibility at stake, the ECB will then be forced to do more, if the currently agreed measures were to prove inefficient to reach the target or the inflation outlook were to worsen. Draghi reinforced his dovish message on Thursday by saying the Governing Council unanimously acknowledges it, and by suggesting that preparatory work for this eventuality is already underway at that ECB. No hint was given about the timing, but all eyes will obviously be pointed at December Eurosystem projections. Concerning what could be done, the door was left completely open.

Despite apparent lack of action, the ECB meeting was not an irrelevant one. Draghi clearly showed that divergences of views within the Governing Council will not be allowed to put the credibility of the ECB at stake. The message delivered on Thursday was overall extremely dovish and clarified that, no matter how we got here, we should from now on consider the target of €1trillion balance sheet increase as set in stone. Such explicit commitment reinforces the credibility of the additional claim that further measures would be introduced if the target could not be reached. But it also raises the pressure on the ECB. As the bar of expectation as never been higher, divergences are likely to re-surface in the politically complex environment the ECB has to navigate through, promising much more interesting developments for the months ahead. 


Republished with permission from MNI News.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Fiscal policy and rules after the pandemic

What are the possibilities for shaping the new fiscal policy?

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Maria Demertzis, Michel Heijdra and Katja Lautar Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 24, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governance

Including home-ownership costs in the inflation indicator is not just a technical issue

The European Central Bank is right to propose inclusion of owner-occupied housing services in the inflation indicator. But the ECB’s preferred method would involve an asset price in the consumer inflation indicator.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fiscal arithmetic and risk of sovereign insolvency

The record-high debt levels in advanced economies increase the risk of sovereign insolvency. Governments should start fiscal consolidation soon in an environment of low nominal and real interest rates and post-COVID growth.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global economy and trade, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

European governance

Growth and inflation after the pandemic in the EU

Countries hit comparatively hard during the financial crisis, helped also by domestic and European policies, are bouncing back from the pandemic faster than their peers.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceFrench Senate

European Union countries’ National Recovery and Resilience Plans: A cross-country comparison

Testimony before the Economic Affairs Committee of the French Senate.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European governance, French Senate, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 12, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Next Generation EU borrowing: a first assessment

The Next Generation EU programme is radically changing the way the EU finances itself and interacts with financial markets. This paper assesses the first design decisions made by the European Commission and the issuances that have taken place so far. It also outlines the potential risks and opportunities linked to this upgrading of the EU borrowing.

By: Rebecca Christie, Grégory Claeys and Pauline Weil Topic: Banking and capital markets, European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 10, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The New Euro Area Inflation Indicator and Target: The Right Reset?

Testimony to the Monetary Dialogue Preparatory Meeting of the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Phasing out COVID-19 emergency support programmes: effects on productivity and financial stability

How can European countries phase out the COVID-19 support measures without having a negative impact on productivity and financial stability?

Speakers: Eric Bartelsman, Maria Demertzis, Peter Grasmann and Laurie Mayers Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read article
 

External Publication

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The new euro area inflation indicator and target: the right reset?

In-depth analysis on the European Central Bank's revised inflation target prepared for the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

European monetary policy: lessons from the past two decades

This event will feature the presentation of “Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis – A Tale of Two Decades of the European Central Bank."

Speakers: Petra Geraats, Wolfgang Lemke, Francesco Papadia and Massimo Rostagno Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

COVID-19 financial aid and productivity: has support been well spent?

While support schemes during the pandemic were not targeted at protecting ‘good’ firms, financial support mostly went to those with the capacity to survive and succeed. Labour schemes have been effective in protecting employment.

By: Carlo Altomonte, Maria Demertzis, Lionel Fontagné and Steffen Müller Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

Does money growth tell us anything about inflation?

Attention should be paid to a possible sequence of negative events: if inflation would start to be volatile and money growth remains high, efforts to control inflation could be undermined.

By: Leonardo Cadamuro and Francesco Papadia Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Load more posts