Blog Post

Industrial policy: the missing link in the new EU cohesion package

The EU is currently discussing the new deal on the shape and the priorities of the EU Budget for the next programming period running from 2014 to 2020. Negotiations are expected to be finalised by the end of 2012. As part of this larger deal, the legislative package on the new EU cohesion policy defines […]

By: Date: April 26, 2012 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

The EU is currently discussing the new deal on the shape and the priorities of the EU Budget for the next programming period running from 2014 to 2020. Negotiations are expected to be finalised by the end of 2012.

As part of this larger deal, the legislative package on the new EU cohesion policy defines the principles behind the allocation and management of Structural and Cohesion Funds over the next seven years.

So far the debate on the future EU cohesion policy has not been as visible as others. And yet, Structural and Cohesion funds have played an important role in the European crisis and must be put to use to address current challenges from youth unemployment to the credit constraints facing Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) and rising national and regional disparities (see).

The legislative package on EU cohesion policy that the European Commission proposed on 6 October 2011 and now under the scrutiny of the General Affairs Council builds on a number of new principles:

  • Thematic concentration
  • Ex ante (regulatory) conditions for the allocation of funds
  • Macroeconomic conditionality
  • Performance-oriented EU cohesion policy
  • Greater flexibility in the design of funded programmes

In a nutshell, the principles above imply that EU countries need to focus on a limited number of priorities; that the allocation of EU funds is subject to the existence of a number of conditions pertaining to the regulatory framework (for example, the appropriate transposition of EU laws on public procurement) but also the macroeconomic environment (namely, absence of excessive deficits and/or excessive macroeconomic imbalances); and finally that there will be a greater focus on performance including rewards for those that meet the agreed targets and the revision of programmes half-way through if they appear not to be effective.

The renewal of governance and the integrated approach are very much appropriate considering that the impact of EU funds on economic growth and cohesion is mostly a function of the way in which the funds are actually delivered. But there is still a gap to fill between the national and the European level.

The thematic-concentration approach forces recipient countries to pick a number of priorities from a list of eleven objectives. The priorities need to fit into a so-called Common Strategic Framework to makes sure they are consistent with each other and their interaction delivers the strongest possible impact. It sounds like common sense. However, because in an integrated market transnational spill-overs are as important as national ones, concentration makes full sense only if there is coordination at the European level (and not only at the national level), so that neighbouring regions maximise gains from, for example, international production value chains or investment in projects that produce important externalities (eg energy).

One such form of EU coordination could well take the form of a European industrial policy. Philippe Aghion has already advocated a rethinking of industrial policy in Europe. The argument is that targeted state intervention to support the most competitive sectors, possibly also using EU funds, can have important growth-enhancing effects (see the policy brief Rethinking industrial policy)

The European Commission has here a great role to play. It can take advantage of the new European Semester process. The Semester is an exercise in economic policy coordination for which EU member states submit their fiscal and structural reform plans early on in the year and at the same time to show that the framing of fiscal policy is consistent with other structural interventions including the use of EU funds to support long-term investment. That way internal consistency across policy areas is guaranteed. It is important that the same consistency exists across national reform plans. A European industrial policy strategy is what would contribute to enhanced coordination across countries.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1
12:30

The EU recovery fund - state of play and outlook

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 1- In this session we will discuss the EU recovery fund, its state of play and outlook.

Speakers: Nadia Calviño, Karolina Ekholm and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:00

Conversation on the recovery programmes

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session, we discuss the recovery programmes.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Henry Foy and Tadeusz Kościński Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Conference on the Future of Europe: envisioning EU citizens engagement

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - Panellists will discuss different options and what they may entail while revisiting the debates on the future of Europe at national and EU-level that have been conducted thus far.

Speakers: Caroline de Gruyter, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Niclas Poitiers and György Szapáry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
13:00

European banks: under global competitive pressure?

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - European banks have lost stature and remain generally low-profitability, low-valuation in comparison to their global peers. Is that a problem? If so, what can EU policymakers do to address it?

Speakers: José Antonio Álvarez Álvarez, Mairead McGuinness and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
15:45

Blending physical and virtual: shaping the new workplace

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - This panel will cover the changes the COVID-19 pandemic made to our workplaces, and what to expect in the near future.

Speakers: Nicholas Bloom, Michael Froman, Mario Mariniello, Sara Matthieu and Luca Visentini Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Academy Palace
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
09:00

The role of the EU's trade strategy for an inclusive and sustainable recovery

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - We are delighted to welcome Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People to talk about Europe's trade strategy.

Speakers: Valdis Dombrovskis, Alicia García-Herrero and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read article
 

Blog Post

Will European Union recovery spending be enough to fill digital investment gaps?

The recovery facility will boost digital transformation, but questions remain whether it will be sufficient to achieve Europe’s digital ambitions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, J. Scott Marcus and Alkiviadis Tzaras Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 20, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

A new direction for the European Union’s half-hearted semiconductor strategy

The EU needs a more targeted strategy to increase its presence in this strategic and thriving sector, building on its existing strengths, while accommodating its relatively low domestic needs.

By: Niclas Poitiers and Pauline Weil Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Fair vaccine access is a goal Europe cannot afford to miss – July update

European countries must do more to tackle the vaccine uptake gap. Vaccination data should be published at the maximum granularity level so researchers and local decision-makers can monitor progress.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Mario Mariniello Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

SPACs in the gap

Special-purpose acquisition vehicles could fill a gap in European equity markets and lure risk-averse investors off the sidelines.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts