Past Event

Spitzenkandidaten series: Jan Zahradil

The fourth event in the The Road to Europe - Brussels Briefing Live: Spitzenkandidaten series. The series features the lead candidates for the European Elections of six parties and is jointly organised by Bruegel and the Financial Times in March and April 2019.

Date: April 4, 2019, 8:30 am Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

video & audio

summary

For the fourth event of the Spitzenkandidaten series co-hosted by Bruegel and the Financial Times, Jan Zahradil of the European Conservatives and Reformists Group (ECR) was the guest candidate. Zahradil has served as a Czech MEP since 2004, and his interviewers for the discussion were Maria Demertzis, the Deputy Director of Bruegel, and Jim Brundsen, a European correspondent from the Financial Times.

The discussion began with a question about Zahradil’s position on the general growth agenda for the Eurpean Union and what policies he would hope to pursue to promote growth as commission president. Zahradil, espousing his unabashed euroscepticism, explained that he is in favor of scaling back the power and reach of the European Commission. He wants the commission to only act in the areas of budget and legislation. In regard to the budget, he thinks that the EU could do a better job of ensuring that cohesion funds are used for projects that stimulate growth in member states. On legislation, he called for a freeze on the creation of new legislation and said that he would like to enact a review (to be carried out by the Regulatory Scrutiny Board) of legal acts such that those that place unnecessary restrictions on business activities and hence limit growth potential are dismantled. The interviewers pressed Zahradil to give more details on what he would do specifically in rolling back the scope of the commission, and his responses were quite vague. The interviewers explained that Junker and Timmermans had originally planned to scale back regulation, but upon review of EU regulations found that most were very necessary and helpful. Zahradil said that Junker failed to deliver on his promise and that he would not make a similar mistake.

On the topic of trade, Zahradil put aside his euroscepticism for a moment, claiming that he wants the EU to continue to present a unified trade agenda and that he plans for the removal of trade barriers to be at the forefront of this agenda. He advocated for EU retaliation to US tariffs, and he explained that he is a firm believer in the importance of transatlantic connections between the US and the EU. In regards to China and their tendency to not follow the international laws set by the WTO, Zahradil said that he does not want to follow the path of the US, for he believes that American hostility toward China is based more in conflicting geopolitical aspirations than pure economics. He supported the idea of working to reform the WTO and seeking to address Chinese unfair trade practices through a multilateral forum. Yet while calling for a unilateral front on trade, he also said that sometimes individual EU states will need to pursue their own interests, and he does not see the approaching 16+1 summit in Dubrovnik as a subtle Chinese attempt to divide Europe between East and West.

Moving into eurozone reform, Zahradil allowed his eurosceptic ideas to be incredibly clear. He explained that he wants to abandon the underlying political idea that the EU needs to have just one currency. He wants it to be relatively easy for countries to leave the eurozone and adopt their own currency if they are not able to meet the requirements laid out in the stability and growth pact. He believes that if the legal process for leaving the euro is improved, then such an action would be able to occur smoothly without a negative reaction from the market. On this point, the interviewers pushed back, citing Brexit as an example that markets will do as they please even if there is a legal mechanism for leaving in place. In this section of the discussion, climate change was discussed as well, and the interviewers asked Zahradil to describe his stance on climate change. He said he is not a climate change denier and believes that we can address climate change that comes from humans. He also said that there is little we can do to address natural climate change. He does want to have environmental standards in trade agreements but believes that these do not need to go beyond the examples that the EU already has in current agreements.

In the last section on industrial policy, Zahradil explained that he is a promoter of a level playing field and that he is against the removal of competition laws in order to create “European Champions” that will compete with China and the US. In dealing with the Chinese companies who do not abide by the competition laws that lead to such a “level playing field,” he said that they should be denied market access to the EU until they comply with fair competition laws.

Overall, Zahradil’s main policy agenda was to scale back the role of the EU Commission. In the Q&A section, he was asked why he wants to be the president of an institution that he wants to scale back, and he said it was for that very reason, to scale back the Commission, that he would like to be president.

Notes by Davis Cousar


This event is a part of a series of talks and debates with Europe’s Spitzenkandidaten and political leaders. Journalists from the FT, along with a Bruegel Director or a senior scholar, will explore and challenge the main political parties’ policies for the future of the continent in front of an invited audience. The events will be livestreamed on the Bruegel website. For more events, see here.

Schedule

Apr 4, 2019

8:30

Check-in and breakfast

9:00-10:15

Conversation

Jim Brunsden, Europe correspondent, Financial Times

Maria Demertzis, Deputy Director

Jan Zahradil, Member of the European Parliament and lead candidate for the Civic Democratic Party

10:15-10:30

Q&A

10:30

End

Speakers

Jim Brunsden

Europe correspondent, Financial Times

Maria Demertzis

Deputy Director

Jan Zahradil

Member of the European Parliament and lead candidate for the Civic Democratic Party

Location & Contact

Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels

Matilda Sevon

[email protected]

Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

External Publication

EU-China trade and investment relations in challenging times

In this report, we have focused on trade and investment relations and have not attempted to define the many other policy instruments that the EU can and should pursue to increase its leverage towards China, and to protect its domestic economy while boosting domestic investment and trade.

By: Alicia García-Herrero, Guntram B. Wolff, Jianwei Xu, Niclas Poitiers, Gabriel Felbermayr, Rolf J. Langhammer, Wan-Hsin Liu and Alexander Sandkamp Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 4, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

COVID-19 and India: economic impact and response

This piece was published the day before India imposed one of the world's strictest lockdowns in its response to the COVID-19 response. It remains relevant in assessing the government's actions in the ten weeks that have since passed.

By: Suman Bery Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 27, 2020
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Brief

Rebooting Europe: a framework for a post COVID-19 economic recovery

COVID-19 has triggered a severe recession and policymakers in European Union countries are providing generous, largely indiscriminate, support to companies. As the recession gets deeper, a more comprehensive strategy is needed. This should be based on four principles: viability of supported entities, fairness, achieving societal goals, and giving society a share in future profits. The effort should be structured around equity and recovery funds with borrowing at EU level.

By: Julia Anderson, Simone Tagliapietra and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: May 13, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Keeping trade open during and after Covid-19

This event examines the impact of the Covid-19 crisis on open markets and connected supply chains globally.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, André Sapir, Senator the Hon Simon Birmingham and Rebecca Fatima Sta Maria Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: April 30, 2020
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

CANCELLED: How adequate is the European toolbox to deal with financial stability risks in a low rate environment?

Bruegel is delighted to welcome the governor of the Central Bank of Ireland, Gabriel Makhlouf. He will deliver a keynote address about how adequate the European toolbox is to tackle financial stability risks in a low rate environment. Following his speech, a panel of experts will further discuss the topic.

Speakers: Gabriel Makhlouf, Guntram B. Wolff and Agnès Bénassy-Quéré Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: March 31, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

What the EU should do and not do on trade in medical equipment

The European Union has introduced export controls on some medical supplies. This was a mistake. It should announce that it is withdrawing the measure, and call on other countries to do the same.

By: André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: March 25, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

CANCELLED: India-EU Partnership: New Vistas for the Next Decade

Policymakers, academics and private sector actors from the EU and India come together to work on common issues and explore further areas of cooperation.

Speakers: Yamini Aiyar, Suman Bery, Navroz K Dubash, Alicia García-Herrero, Rajat Kathuria, Partha Mukhopadhyay, Ananth Padmanabhan, Georgios Petropoulos, André Sapir, Shyam Saran, Simone Tagliapietra and Marc Vanheukelen Topic: Global Economics & Governance Location: India International Centre, Lodhi Gardens, Lodhi Estate, New Delhi, Delhi, India Date: March 12, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

What can the EU learn from the China-Switzerland free trade agreement?

The US-China trade war has placed EU trade relations with China under the microscope. Should the EU challenge China’s trade practices and employ trade defence measures? Or should they be diplomatic and embark on negotiations, perhaps paving the way to a Free Trade Agreement? Close examination of the 2013 agreement between China and Switzerland suggests much will have to change for trade negotiations between China and the EU to succeed.

By: Uri Dadush and Marta Domínguez-Jiménez Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 3, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The Sound of Economics Live - The Brussels effect: How the European Union rules the world

This was a live recording of an episode of the Sound of Economics, Bruegel's podcast series. The discussion centered around the book of Anu Bradford, The Brussels Effect.

Speakers: Anu Bradford, Ashoka Mody, Giuseppe Porcaro and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: March 3, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Companies must move supply chains further from China

Virus shows Southeast Asian factories too dependent on imported production inputs

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 28, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

As the Coronavirus spreads, can the EU afford to close its borders?

In 2018, 320 million trips were made between EU countries and almost 2 million people crossed Schengen borders to go to work. Stopping them would cause serious economic disruption.

By: Raffaella Meninno and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: February 27, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Why the US Trade Agreement will slow China’s economy

The response of the global financial markets to the trade agreement reached between the United States and China has been very positive, probably excessively so given the relatively limited size of the agreement reached.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 20, 2020
Load more posts