Past Event

How to keep a competitive environment while engaging with non market economies?

How can we ensure fair competition between European firms and Chinese state-backed players?

Date: November 19, 2020, 1:00 pm Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy

State-owned enterprises (SOEs) are key players in the Chinese economy, and increasingly, in the world. Twenty of the 100 largest global firms are now Chinese SOEs, from just a handful in 2008.

European policy-makers are worried about the growing weight of Chinese state-backed players–which includes SOEs as well as mixed-ownership and fully private companies that enjoy preferential treatment. Chinese state support could distort competition in the single market and the current trade policy frameworks provide inadequate protection. The European Commission recently proposed to reinforce its framework (the White Paper on Foreign Subsidies). Can the proposed new rules ensure fair competition between European firms and Chinese state-backed players?

In the first session, panelists will review the latest evidence about the role of Chinese SOEs and discuss the gaps in the existing trade policy frameworks. The second session will focus on solutions. Is the White Paper proposal adequate? Are there better alternatives? What if China retaliates?

This is an invitation-only event, open only to Bruegel members and selected invitees.

Schedule

Nov 19, 2020

13:00-13:05

Welcome

Guntram B. Wolff, Director

13:05-14:00

Session 1: Chinese SOEs and the European single market

Chair: Julia Anderson, Research Analyst

Helge Berger, Assistant Director, Asia and Pacific Department, IMF

Alicia García-Herrero, Senior Fellow

Cian Ruane, Economist, IMF

Hylke Vandenbussche, Professor and Head of international economics, University of Leuven

14:00-14:15

Break

14:15-15:45

Session 2: Identifying solutions

Chair: Georgios Petropoulos, Research Fellow

Michiel Boots, Chief Economist, The Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, The Netherlands

Carles Esteva Mosso, Deputy Director-General, European Commission, DG COMP

Frédéric Jenny, Chairman of the OECD Competition Committee

15:45

End

Speakers

Julia Anderson

Research Analyst

Helge Berger

Assistant Director, Asia and Pacific Department, IMF

Michiel Boots

Chief Economist, The Minister of Economic Affairs and Climate Policy, The Netherlands

Alicia García-Herrero

Senior Fellow

Carles Esteva Mosso

Deputy Director-General, European Commission, DG COMP

Frédéric Jenny

Chairman of the OECD Competition Committee

Georgios Petropoulos

Research Fellow

Cian Ruane

Economist, IMF

Hylke Vandenbussche

Professor and Head of international economics, University of Leuven

Guntram B. Wolff

Director

Location & Contact

Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels

Matilda Sevon

[email protected]

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Mar
15
14:00

Declining competition: a transatlantic challenge

Join us for a discussion of transatlantic competition with Managing Director of the IMF Kristalina Georgieva and Executive Vice President of the European Commission Margrethe Vestager.

Speakers: Romain Duval, Kristalina Georgieva, Greg Ip, Amy Klobuchar, Nancy Rose, Tommaso Valletti, Margrethe Vestager, David Wessel and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Policy Contribution

China’s state-owned enterprises and competitive neutrality

The concept of competitive neutrality can be used to assess how far a market is from being a competitive environment. In China, competitive neutrality is lacking, with state-owned firms favoured in most sectors, even over Chinese private firms.

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Gary Ng Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 23, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

Will COVID accelerate productivity growth?

The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted an increasing number of rich-country firms to reduce their reliance on global supply chains and invest more in robots at home. But it is probably too soon to tell whether this switch will increase productivity growth in advanced economies.

By: Dalia Marin Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: February 10, 2021
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism: Greening the EU trade?

Assessing CBAM from a trade perspective.

Speakers: Suman Bery, Luis Garicano, Emily Lydgate and André Sapir Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: February 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

External Publication

China and the WTO: Why Multilateralism Still Matters

An examination of China’s participation in the World Trade Organization, the conflicts it has caused, and how WTO reforms could ease them.

By: Petros C. Mavroidis and André Sapir Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 28, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

External Publication

Getting America Back In The Game: A Multilateral Perspective

How can friends of the multilateral system re-engage the United States under President-elect Biden?

By: Richard E. Baldwin, Chad P. Bown, Jonathan T. Fried, Anabel González, André Sapir and Tetsuya Watanabe Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 28, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

A rushed deal or a rush to judgement?

The Comprehensive Agreement on Investment (CAI) is supposed to improve market access for European companies operating in China and to ensure a level playing field, as well as reciprocity. Does it fulfil such expectations?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 27, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

中國企業受累貿戰和疫情,但仍優於全球同業

總體上,中國企業的表現半喜半憂:相對全球同業表現較好,但收入下降和槓桿率升高帶來的風險也不容忽視。

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 21, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

RCEP對亞洲影響積極,無阻價值鏈重組

總體而言,雖然RCEP成員之間在市場准入上實際提升幅度有限(例如中國和澳洲),但這一協定的意義在於讓世界意識到,亞洲仍然依賴中國市場,亞洲國家不能錯過中國放寬市場准入的機會,即使幅度有限。

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 21, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

An EU - China investment deal: a second look

For the moment, it does not look like we have the basis for greater and deeper economic relations with China. However, dismissing China and the opportunities that it creates for global cooperation would also be a mistake.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 19, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Résilience : la nouvelle boussole

Pour surmonter le choc de la pandémie de Covid-19, l’économiste écarte, dans sa chronique, l’idée d’un repli protectionniste, mais suggère de passer d’un objectif de réduction des coûts à celui de la réduction des risques.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 18, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The double irony of the new UK-EU trade relationship

The Trade and Cooperation Agreement signed between the European Union and the United Kingdom goes against six decades of UK efforts to avoid being economically disadvantaged in Europe. Tracking the evolution of the EU-UK relationship over the last 60 years can help in understanding this.

By: André Sapir Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: January 12, 2021
Load more posts