Opinion

Relaunching transatlantic cooperation with a carbon border adjustment mechanism

The best way for the EU and the US to jointly introduce carbon border adjustment would be to form a ‘climate club’.

By: and Date: June 11, 2021 Topic: Energy & Climate

This piece was originally published by Le Monde and Domani.

Le Monde logo

On June 15, President Joe Biden will join Charles Michel and Ursula von der Leyen in Brussels for an important European Union–United States summit that aims at relaunching bilateral cooperation after four years in which it has withered. Climate change features at the top of the agenda, raising hopes about the potential role of the transatlantic partners in fostering global decarbonisation.

There is reason for optimism. The two economies share today a common climate ambition and, representing 40% of global gross domestic product and 30% of goods imports, other countries cannot simply ignore what happens here. The key question is, how can the EU and the US decarbonise domestically while also creating an incentive for other countries to move in the same direction? In our view, the answer can be found in the joint introduction of carbon border adjustment measures.

A carbon border adjustment measure is a tariff on imported goods based on their carbon content. This tariff, the amount of which would be equivalent to domestic carbon prices, will be necessary in any country that intends to seriously scale-up decarbonisation. The introduction of strong carbon pricing measures and strong environmental regulations to curb emissions runs the risk of carbon leakage, a situation in which, in order to cut costs, companies shift the production of carbon-intensive goods to countries with weaker policies. Economies with tough climate measures then import those products. Thus, carbon border adjustment is not about protectionism, but about ensuring a level-playing field in a situation in which some countries are doing more than others to implement their decarbonisation pledges.

In the context of the European Green Deal, the EU is already planning the introduction of a carbon border adjustment measure covering the electricity sector and energy-intensive industrial sectors by 2023 at the latest. This could be a good start to the system, which must then be expanded to all imported goods to be efficient and effective. Until last year, European policymakers feared that the United States would have considered such a move as the start of a trade war, but with President Biden there is now an opportunity for a very different conversation. During the presidential campaign, he himself pledged the introduction of carbon border adjustment measures on carbon-intensive goods imported from countries that are failing on their climate and environmental obligations. Furthermore, the US Congress is working on two carbon pricing bills that also include carbon border adjustment.

The best way for the EU and the US to jointly introduce carbon border adjustment would be to form a ‘climate club’, which can be done in three steps. First, they would have to coordinate their domestic decarbonisation roadmaps more closely. Each can choose its own approach, but near-term milestones should be broadly similar, to avoid carbon leakage. Second, they would have to agree on a clear methodology to measure the carbon content of all goods, including the most complex. Third, they would need to make sure the system is transparent and open to all countries willing to join, as this would ensure compliance with the provisions of the World Trade Organisation.

By setting-up such a climate club, the EU and the US would not only ensure their industrial competitiveness while they accelerate domestic decarbonisation, but they would also give others – starting with China – a significant incentive to scale-up their domestic climate measures to be part of the club, and thus avoid being subject to such tariffs in key export destination markets.

To further increase its contribution to global decarbonisation, alongside its international acceptance, part of the revenues collected from a carbon border adjustment mechanism should be used to fund the deployment of clean technologies in low-income countries.

Thanks to clean-technology developments and unprecedented political momentum, the world has a chance to reverse its failure to tackle climate change. The EU and the US have a historical duty to lead. Doing so by creating a climate club founded on the joint introduction of a carbon border adjustment mechanism, open to all willing countries, offers the greatest guarantee of success.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

[LIVE] A transatlantic climate alliance

When Joe Biden visits Europe for the first time as US president, he should begin forging a transatlantic green deal.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: June 11, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Climate change and lifestyle choices

Do we need drastic changes in our lifestyles so that we can meet our climate ambitions by 2050?

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Energy & Climate Date: June 9, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Policy Contribution

Europe should not neglect its capital markets union

The European Union’s capital markets remain very underdeveloped compared to the United States. The market for equity, as measured as the size of the total market capitalisation of listed domestic firms relative to GDP, is much larger in the US and in Japan than in Europe.

By: Maria Demertzis, Marta Domínguez-Jiménez and Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: June 7, 2021
Read article
 

Opinion

A transatlantic climate alliance

When Joe Biden visits Europe for the first time as US president, he should begin forging a transatlantic green deal.

By: Ana Palacio and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: June 4, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Is Bidenomics more than catch-up?

The Biden administration's promises to 'think big' and rebuild the country seem like a major historical departure from decades of policy orthodoxy.

By: Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: June 3, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Banks in a net-zero Europe

A net-zero emissions target is a powerful incentive for the low-carbon transition, but for bank supervisors, climate-related risks, not climate outcomes, should remain the focus.

By: Alexander Lehmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: June 1, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

For the climate, Asia-Pacific must phase out fossil-fuel subsidies

An exit from coal in the Asia-Pacific region is a global decarbonisation priority.

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: May 31, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Paris Reinforce: From Numbers to Insights: How to think about economic-climate modelling

Join us for the presentation of ‘From Numbers to Insights: How to think about economic-climate modelling’.

Speakers: Haris Doukas, Ajay Gambhir, Glen Peters, Georg Zachmann and Ewelina Daniel Topic: Energy & Climate Date: May 26, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Form a climate club: United States, European Union and China

Can the three biggest economies agree a carbon tax on imports to catalyse climate action globally?

Speakers: Simone Tagliapietra, Sheldon Whitehouse and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: May 3, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

Accounting for climate policies in Europe’s sovereign debt market

Sovereign debt will be vital in stimulating sustainable investment, but information is lacking on how green public spending actually is.

By: Marta Domínguez-Jiménez and Alexander Lehmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: May 3, 2021
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

The External Dimension of the EU's Green Deal: What Role for EU Development Cooperation?

The EU Green Deal's political scope extends far beyond climate neutrality and the European Union. What geopolitical and human repercussions does it have for its partners?

Speakers: Mikaela Gavas, Roberta Lusardi, Carla Montesi, Njuguna Ndung'u and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: April 29, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The Polish view on extending the EU-ETS: Red lines, room to manoeuvre, game changers

What are the red lines, what room is there to manoeuvre, and which elements of the new carbon pricing architecture can be real game changers?

Speakers: Wanda Buk, Maciej Bukowski, Adam Guibourgé-Czetwertyński, Michael Pahle, Aleksander Śniegocki, Urszula Stefanowicz and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: April 21, 2021
Load more posts