Opinion

2021 can be a climate breakthrough, but Biden and Europe need to talk

"2021 can be a breakthrough year for climate: the new US administration and the EU have a real opportunity, through a ‘global net zero coalition’, to remove some of the key bottlenecks in the global path to climate neutrality."

By: Date: November 9, 2020 Topic: Energy & Climate

This opinion piece was published in Le Monde, El Economista and Domani.

Le Monde logo

After four years of absence and boycott, in 2021 the United States will make a comeback to the global climate action scene.

The process is already set in motion.

Climate change represents –alongside the pandemic, the economic crisis, and racial injustice– one of the four pillars of the Biden-Harris transition team, which will lay the foundations of the administration.

Once sworn into office, Joe Biden is set to immediately re-enrol the US in the Paris climate agreement and to start promoting his plan for climate change and environmental justice.

The plan, aimed at putting the US on an irreversible path to net zero emissions by 2050 while creating millions of well-paying jobs, includes proposals for 100 percent carbon-free electricity by 2035, $2 trillion in green investment over four years and a pledge to devote 40 percent of these investments to disadvantaged communities.

The degree to which Biden will be able to deliver the plan will significantly depend on runoff elections for Georgia’s senate seats on January 5, as they will determine which party has control of the US Senate.

Should Democrats win them, Biden would have a majority in the Senate, increasing his chances of a prompt implementation of his climate plan. Without that majority, he would have to resort to executive actions and the use of federal agencies to push parts of his climate agenda, while negotiating other parts in Congress with Republicans, something President Obama also resorted to during his term of office.

Alongside the implementation of domestic green initiatives, Biden will also have to deal with the international dimension of climate action. This comes at an historical juncture for climate commitment: the European Union, China, Japan and South Korea all recently announced goals for net zero emission by 2050 or shortly afterwards. The addition of the US would bring this to about two thirds of the global economy, and more than a half of the world’s emissions.

A sensible way for Biden to engage with the international dimension of climate action might be to engage with the EU in the establishment of a ‘global net zero coalition’.

This ‘coalition of the willing’ – open to all nations – should aim at overcoming some of the key obstacles the world will face on the road to climate neutrality.

In an ideal world, the coalition would focus on the joint development of the green technologies that are required to decarbonise our economies: from renewable energy to green hydrogen, from electric cars to batteries. But this is not realistic, as green technology leadership will likely remain a matter of national sovereignty in the US and in EU countries, without mentioning China.

Realistically a ‘global net zero coalition’ might be focused on items that, although key to the achievement of climate neutrality by the mid-century, would likely fail to materialise in absence of strong international cooperation.

Two examples are the introduction of carbon border adjustment measures and the development of carbon emission removal technologies.

Economists have long argued that the best policy tool to tackle climate change is to price carbon to encourage emitters to reduce their carbon pollution and turn green. One of the major political difficulties in doing so relates to the fear that such schemes could dampen economic competitiveness and lead to industries’ relocation to countries with weak climate policies. These risks can be tackled with the introduction of carbon border adjustment measures, which represent a tax on imported goods based on their carbon content.

The EU intends to introduce such measures in the context of its Green deal and Biden’s climate plan also commits to a similar course of action. The best way to introduce such measures is by following a multilateral approach to prevent protectionist risks and global trade tensions. The US and the EU might thus jointly develop such measures, so that the initiative is not perceived as unilateral. This could pave the way for a smooth introduction of carbon border adjustment measures and therefore allow the development of much stronger carbon pricing schemes in the two blocks and beyond.

Removing carbon from the atmosphere will be necessary to reach net zero by the middle of the century, and subsequently achieve net negative emissions. This can be done with both nature-based and technology solutions. Nature-based solutions include afforestation and reforestation. Technology based solutions include carbon capture and storage and geoengineering solutions like direct air capture. Notwithstanding their key importance for climate action, these solutions currently remain insufficiently developed due to a lack of incentive to individual action. This makes international cooperation essential in the field. The US and the EU might spark such a new global effort on afforestation and reforestation across the world, as well as on research and innovation in technology-based solutions.

2021 can be a breakthrough year for climate. Global momentum to achieve net zero emissions by middle of the century is building in a way no one could have predicted a year ago. Covid-19 has forced nations to inject billions into their economies, and some of them are committed to build back better, notably investing in the green transition.

In November 2021, the United Nations climate conference in Glasgow will see all countries present their new emissions reduction plans for 2030. On top of raising their individual climate ambitions, the US and the EU have a real opportunity, through a ‘global net zero coalition’, to remove some of the key bottlenecks in the global path to climate neutrality.

Conditions have never been so favourable for global climate action: Washington and Brussels have the responsibility to lead.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

Why China should fear the EU's carbon border tax

Expect Beijing to soon start lobbying against the proposal.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: July 26, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:15

The role of the state in providing infrastructure for decarbonisation

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - Who should be responsible for providing crucial infrastructure for decarbonisation and how should it be managed?

Speakers: Jean-Bernard Lévy, Diederik Samsom, Simone Tagliapietra, Laurence Tubiana and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Sustainable finance

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - In this session on the final day of the Meetings, our panelists will discuss the future of finance and its sustainability.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Alberto De Paoli, Pierre Heilbronn and Alexandra Jour-Schroeder Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Académies, Rue Ducale 1, Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

External Publication

A Safety Net for the Green Economy

How to protect workers hurt by the fight against climate change.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Date: July 20, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

The European Union’s carbon border mechanism and the WTO

To avoid any backlash, the European Union should work with other World Trade Organisation members to define basic principles of carbon border adjustment mechanisms.

By: André Sapir Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: July 19, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Making sure green household investment pays off

Policies are needed to support green fuel switching by households; support should be phased out as the carbon price rises.

By: Ben McWilliams and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: July 19, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

A fitting plan for the European Green Deal?

How does the world's first roadmap for meeting climate goals stack up?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Energy & Climate Date: July 15, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

External Publication

Building the Road to Greener Pastures

How the G20 can support the recovery with sustainable local infrastructure investment.

By: Mia Hoffmann, Ben McWilliams and Niclas Poitiers Topic: Global Economics & Governance, Testimonies Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

‘Fit-for-55’ package: Squaring the circle

The European Union finds itself at the centre of a three-dimensional puzzle. Burdens need to be shared between 450 million citizens, 25 million businesses and EU countries in a way that is acceptable to enough of them.

By: Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The EU green bond standard: sensible implementation could define a new asset class

The proposed EU green bond standard will be less prone to ‘greenwashing’, and the widest possible set of issuers and jurisdictions should be encouraged to use the standard.

By: Alexander Lehmann Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts