Blog Post

Lessons learned from the electricity tracker

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 crisis, Bruegel’s new tool has gauged the impact of the crisis on economic activity by tracking changes in electricity consumption.

By: and Date: June 22, 2020 Topic: Energy & Climate

This blog is partly based on an article published in the COVID edition of the IAEE Energy Forum.

International Association for Energy Economics

Our tool, updated daily, tracks electricity consumption in 2020 as a percentage of the corresponding day in 2019, in most European countries and a select few outside Europe. We are now launching a new interactive feature allowing for more user-friendly visualisation of consumption by country or region (Figure 2 on the tracker page).

High-frequency and internationally comparable indicators of economic activity are helpful to track developments in a fast-moving, international crisis such as that triggered by the COVID-19 pandemic. Changes in daily electricity consumption are a strong proxy for industrial and/or economic activity. Data on industrial activity for March and April strongly correlates with observed changes in our measure for electricity consumption (Figure 1). Regression analysis in 44 countries found a positive but variable relationship between our electricity consumption data and a measure of social distancing.

Figure 1: Average monthly electricity consumption vs industrial production (January to April 2020)



Caption:
The figure represents average monthly electricity consumption relative to 2019 levels against the European Commission industrial production index. This is plotted from January to April 2020. The colours represent the different countries, whilst the symbols show the different months plotted.

Shifts in electricity consumption are strongly affected by the lockdowns put in place to respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, there are some caveats: many other factors are at play, making it challenging to isolate the causal effect of COVID-19 on electricity demand. To reduce the room for error we have used historical data to correct for the daily temperature variable. As national holidays also reduce demand, we have removed them from the sample. Our tracker has nonetheless often shown depressed electricity consumption in the days immediately following such holidays. For example, in Japan some of the biggest drops in electricity consumption appeared immediately after the ‘Golden Week’ holidays.

Figure 2: Japanese consumption: screenshot from electricity tracker page (figure 2)

Such noise in the data is more problematic when interpreting daily ratios. Weekly average ratios tend to be more robust. Nonetheless, interesting observations can be extracted by using both.

What have we learned?

Electricity consumption immediately dropped when governments effectively shut down economies. A transition through a period of depressed electricity demand followed in most countries. Over the past few weeks, as lockdowns have been cautiously lifted, consumption has begun to gradually pick up. But it has not yet returned to 2019 levels in most countries, indicating that their economies are not yet functioning at full capacity.

Speed of lockdown measures coming into effect

In March, electricity consumption showed clear differences in policy approaches to lockdown between countries that gradually imposed more stringent measures (European countries including Spain and Poland, and US states such as New York) and those who imposed restrictive measures literally overnight, such as India and Russia (Figure 3).

Severity and length of lockdown

Future revisions to GDP growth will likely be linked to the length and extent of depressed electricity consumption. Figure 4 shows the average change in electricity consumption for working days between 16 March and 12 June. Within Europe, countries including Italy, Slovenia and Spain have all been hard hit by the crisis while others, particularly in the Scandinavian region, have suffered small if any reductions. Outside Europe, India has seen a notably large drop.

 

 

Timing of recovery

Electricity consumption is beginning to bounce back as countries move out of lockdown.

The key question now is whether recoveries will be V-shaped or U-shaped: will economic activity quickly return to its pre-COVID 19 levels (perhaps even overshooting last years’ values to compensate for lost output)? Or will aggregate demand remain depressed for the foreseeable future? Additionally, to what extent will damage to the supply side prevent production levels from returning to their pre-crisis levels? Our tracker’s daily updates will use electricity consumption as a proxy to answer these questions by monitoring how long consumption remains depressed in individual countries.

The pace of recovery so far can be gauged by comparing the reductions in electricity demand during the strictest lockdown periods (the first 10 weeks) with those during the past three weeks that saw an easing of lockdowns (Figure 5).

In France and Spain, economic activity is clearly beginning to pick up as electricity consumption has increased. On the other hand, demand in Austria, Germany and Poland appears to be recovering very slowly. Clearly, the depth of the initial demand drops plays a role. In Australia and Japan there is little difference because demand was not significantly affected in the first place. Aggregate activity in the US appears to be returning to levels comparable with 2019, while the European average remains notably reduced.

Recommended citation
Mcwilliams, B and G. Zachmann (2020) ‘Lessons learned from the electricity tracker’, Bruegel Blog, 22 June, available at https://www.bruegel.org/2020/06/lessons-learned-from-the-electricity-tracker/


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

REOPENING EUROPE - Reopening Borders?

In June 2020, as Europe reopened after lockdown, we crossed ten national borders. We listened to diverse citizens, from passers-by to politicians, business people to artists, recording, documenting, and publishing stories.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 29, 2020
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1-3
09:00

Bruegel Annual Meetings 2020

The Annual Meetings are Bruegel's flagship event which gathers high-level speakers to discuss the economic topics that affect Europe and the world.

Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article
 

Blog Post

Is the EU Council agreement aligned with the Green Deal ambitions?

On 21 July, EU leaders agreed on a €1.8 trillion package that should boost the recovery after the COVID-19 crisis, but also contribute to the advancement of key EU societal objectives, starting with the climate transition. In this blog post we assess the green ambitions of the package and evaluate its consistency with the European Green Deal.

By: Grégory Claeys and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 23, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

REOPENING EUROPE - Reopening Governance?

This is a summer feature of the Sound of Economics in cooperation with the Reopening Europe project.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 23, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Having the cake, but slicing it differently: how is the grand EU recovery fund allocated?

The European Commission’s original allocation mechanism really favoured lower-income countries and to a large extent was based on pre-COVID economic data. The modification adopted by the European Council gives more consideration to the country size and the adverse economic impact of COVID-19. As a consequence, by using the Commission’s May 2020 economic forecasts, I estimate that only Germany and France will get more grants from the EU’s recovery fund compared to the Commission’s original proposal, while other countries will get less.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 23, 2020
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

The EU’s Opportunity to Turn Its Markets Toward the Future

Meeting the fiscal demands of COVID-19 will require the European Union to borrow on capital markets more than ever, and for European pension funds and households to look more widely for ways to build their nest eggs safely. The EU should take the challenges of the pandemic and Brexit as a chance to get its financial infrastructure house in order.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 16, 2020
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

The benefits of the single market - the case of last enlargement

As the Brexit negotiations are entering their final straight line, the question of trade agreements is heating up. Economists talk about the “cost of non Europe”. How much each country has gained from belonging to the EU’s single market? How much would it have missed out on if it didn’t belong to the single market? […]

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Global Economics & Governance Date: July 15, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Ukraine: trade reorientation from Russia to the EU

Over the past five years conflict has led to a deterioration of Russo-Ukrainian economic relations while ties with the EU have been deepened. This shift is evident in trade flows: the European Union has become Ukraine’s biggest trading partner, while China is poised to overtake Russia as its second. Natural gas imports from Russia, Ukraine’s prior Achilles heel, have been partially replaced by reverse deliveries from the EU and reduced as result of reform of the gas sector.

By: Marek Dabrowski, Marta Domínguez-Jiménez and Georg Zachmann Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 13, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Apps without borders? How COVID-19 apps show the limits of the EU digital single market

In their toolkit against a pandemic that knows no borders, several EU countries have bet on new technology from our era of globalisation: digital contact tracing COVID-19 apps. But the way they've been rolled out illustrate troublesome limits to the EU digital single market.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 9, 2020
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Brief

Greening the recovery by greening the fiscal consolidation

In the wake of COVID-19, some economic recovery policies will help green the economy – for example, energy renovation of buildings. But there are limits to the share of stimulus that can be explicitly green. The European Union should therefore also green the fiscal consolidation by setting out the path to much higher carbon prices than today. This would guide investment and provide revenues to help the fiscal consolidation.

By: Ben McWilliams, Simone Tagliapietra and Georg Zachmann Topic: Energy & Climate, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 8, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The impacts of electrification on labour market outcomes: the case of Nigeria

In Nigeria, Africa’s largest economy, expanding access to electricity has contributed to increasing labour market participation and transforming the economy away from agricultural activities.

By: Giovanni Occhiali, Robert Kalcik, Enrico Nano and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate Date: July 8, 2020
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Working Paper

The impact economy: balancing profit and impact

Governments and companies can reinforce each other in their pursuit of sustainable development, which is based on three pillars: economic, social and environmental. An impact economy, in which governments and companies balance profit and impact, is best placed to achieve the United Nations sustainable development goals.

By: Dirk Schoenmaker Topic: Energy & Climate, Global Economics & Governance Date: July 7, 2020
Load more posts