Opinion

Why sentiment in Greater Bay Area is deteriorating, especially in Hong Kong

Lack of concrete plans affects sentiment after brief surge on announcement of Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area

By: and Date: November 13, 2019 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

The slowing Chinese economy and US-China trade war are part of the reason Hong Kong’s economy is decelerating rapidly, and the recent social unrest has only aggravated the situation. Among all the uncertainties, an important announcement for Hong Kong and Guangdong province was made in February 2019, namely the Outline Development Plan for the Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area (GBA).

The key component for the GBA is integration. Hong Kong’s integration with mainland China itself is not a new concept. But the question is whether businesses think there are opportunities in this new initiative. After the release of the Outline Development Plan sentiment in Hong Kong surged, but the market perception has again started to revert even with further details of tax harmonisation and financial opening.

The high volatility in the GBA’s image is primarily due to a shortfall of expectations versus reality stemming from the lack of a solid timeline and government funding. More importantly, the scope of ongoing projects remained narrow as 44% of announcements made by Hong Kong firms on the GBA focus only on real estate and infrastructure. Much less is related to the comparative advantages, namely financial and legal services, tourism, health care, transport, and education.

Free movement of the factors of production, namely labour and capital, are vital to achieve an integrated economic area. However, full mobility of labour is clearly difficult and the case is even more challenging for capital as mainland China does not have a fully open capital account, not even with Hong Kong.

One of the obvious differences in terms of why the image is worse in Hong Kong is that the news in mainland China about the GBA tends to be more positive. But it is also true that the benefits for Hong Kong could be less obvious at first sight. If free labour and capital movement were achieved, convergence of income per capita should benefit the poorer cities in Guangdong more. Hong Kong could still benefit but less so in relative terms. Without perfect labour and especially capital movement, it is hard to see how the cities could truly integrate.

That sentiment on the GBA headed further south for Hong Kong after April 2019 while in mainland China it recovered seems to be related to the lack of concrete plans by the Hong Kong government when compared to Guangdong, which entailed a detailed strategic plan for the next three years. Yet given the unique status of “One Country, Two Systems” and its international recognition, Hong Kong can be a key contributor to sectors related to confidence, finance and mobility, and it needs to fully utilise its comparative advantages in order to fully realise the potential of the GBA integration.

The relatively internationally recognised legal system has served both Chinese and foreign investors well, maintaining the confidence of doing business in Hong Kong at present. This means Hong Kong is best positioned to link opportunities and solve disputes between Chinese and foreign investors through legal services, and increasingly technology-related intellectual property rights.

Finance is another longstanding strong point for Hong Kong. The abundant USD liquidity and financing ability is irreplaceable by any of the other cities in the GBA, meaning Hong Kong’s role in finance is important to attract foreign investments and fund projects in the GBA.

However, while the above components have been the catalyst for previous integration between Hong Kong and mainland China, higher mobility is the unique feature for the GBA. With freer flow of people and capital in the future, opportunities could arise when this increased mobility creates synergy with confidence and finance. Sectors with high growth could include tourism, health care, aviation and education, and laxer restrictions will mean more cross-border insurance policies or financial product sales and bring benefit to the financial services industry overall.

However, in the medium term, the key stumbling block is the free flow of factors of production, and in particular between Hong Kong and Guangdong. Free movement of labour is a lesser problem than capital, which seems impossible as it either requires Guangdong to fully open its capital account or Hong Kong to close it, at least partially. The former seems hard in today’s scenario and the latter could be risky for Hong Kong and the GBA as it would reduce its attractiveness for overseas investors and the role of Hong Kong in intermediating capital.

Therefore, it remains uncertain how the various governments can navigate the many issues without hampering the uniqueness of different systems, and the poor recent sentiment also highlights additional concerns and fundamental challenges Hong Kong faces in integrating with the rest of the GBA, and finding a balancing act on the different expectations will be an essential challenge in the future.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Uncoordinated policies behind market collapse

Underlying issues, and not just the coronavirus panic, fed the recent meltdown

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 10, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Gerard Masllorens headshot

The cost of coronavirus in terms of interrupted global value chains

The coronavirus is slowly morphing itself into an important shock. While the extent and cost of this pandemic are unknown, we do know that global supply chains that link Europe to China will be seriously disturbed. We take a look at the numbers based on input-output models. The industry that will be the most affected is Computers and Electronics, followed by textiles.

By: Maria Demertzis and Gerard Masllorens Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 9, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Downsides to Hong Kong’s untargeted cash handout

The stimulus is regressive in nature, as the bulk of expenditure is a one-off cash disbursement per adult

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 4, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

What can the EU learn from the China-Switzerland free trade agreement?

The US-China trade war has placed EU trade relations with China under the microscope. Should the EU challenge China’s trade practices and employ trade defence measures? Or should they be diplomatic and embark on negotiations, perhaps paving the way to a Free Trade Agreement? Close examination of the 2013 agreement between China and Switzerland suggests much will have to change for trade negotiations between China and the EU to succeed.

By: Uri Dadush and Marta Domínguez-Jiménez Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 3, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Companies must move supply chains further from China

Virus shows Southeast Asian factories too dependent on imported production inputs

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 28, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Why the US Trade Agreement will slow China’s economy

The response of the global financial markets to the trade agreement reached between the United States and China has been very positive, probably excessively so given the relatively limited size of the agreement reached.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 20, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Epidemic tests China’s supply chain dominance

Much has been written on the Wuhan coronavirus that causes the respiratory disease Covid-19, but very little is known yet about its impact on the global economy and, in particular, the global value chain. Still, one thing is clear: The shock is bigger than that caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), for the simple reason that China is much more important for the global economy than it was then.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 17, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

China’s Coronavirus will not lead to recession but to stimulus and even more debt

The coronavirus outbreak will not lead to recession but the costs of ensuring growth targets will be high

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 6, 2020
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

External Publication

From globalization to deglobalization: Zooming into trade

This article shows some evidence of the decrease in merchandise, capital and, to a lesser extent people to people flows.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: February 3, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

The US-China trade agreement will not put an end to geopolitical risks

The agreement between the US and China should not be read so positively in Europe, especially in Germany

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 31, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

Stability remains key to China

The most concerning aspect for the Chinese economy will still be to hold up domestic demand. The rapidly rising household debt will put further breaks of the households' ability to purchase durable goods

By: Alicia García-Herrero and Jianwei Xu Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: January 15, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Lessons from the China-US trade truce

The tentatively agreed deal between China and the United States temporarily stops a dangerous dynamic, yet it falls far short of the negotiating objectives of both sides. US trade policy has become a dominion of the executive branch guided principally by the President’s electoral interests. Meanwhile, China demonstrates its capacity to resist pressure: it will enact structural reforms at its own pace in line with its interests. Sadly, the deal confirms that the United States no longer feels obligated to follow WTO rules, and can induce others to do the same.

By: Uri Dadush and Marta Domínguez-Jiménez Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: December 19, 2019
Load more posts