Blog Post

Lockin’ tax haven’s door

Tax avoidance and evasion harm the public coffers, and increase inequality and poverty. This post summarises the recent debate on several aspects of the issue: the update of the European blacklist of tax havens and the related recent report from Oxfam, a call for reform of international taxation by the IMF, and the request for IRS reform by US democratic senators.

By: and Date: March 25, 2019 Topic: Global Economics & Governance

With this tweet, Pierre Moscovici celebrated the update of the European Union’s blacklist of countries considered as fiscal paradises. On March 12th, Ecofin ratified the decision to add 10 new countries to the EU blacklist of non-cooperative jurisdictions, which now counts a total of 15.

On February 27th, at the Bruegel event ‘Reforming decision-making for EU taxation policy, Commissioner Pierre Moscovici said that, in his experience, a game-changer for tax changes is public opinion. The blacklist was put in place by Ecofin in December 2017, in response to the several scandals that have notably raised public interest in the days immediately after the leaks – as we can see in the following chart, based on Google Trends.

In 2017, the EU began a process of evaluation of countries’ taxation regimes, in which it compiled a blacklist and a ‘grey list’ of jurisdictions cooperating to different degrees. The rationale of the lists is to push countries to reform their fiscal systems.

One motivation for the increased scrutiny from the Commission is the wealth held in tax havens. Zucman 2019, estimates it at 10% of world GDP across countries, and finds that the figures for wealth inequality in Europe can substantially increase when using new data sources (e.g. leaks from financial institutions) to ameliorate the estimates for rich households. Richard Murphy estimated a European tax gap of €825 billion per year, resulting from domestic tax evasion. In an older paper (Zucman 2014), the estimated lost tax revenues (accounting only for financial wealth) was $200 billion per year, globally, with a stock of around $7.6 trillion at the end of 2013. In Europe, the number is $75 billion per year.

The estimates are confirmed by the OECD (Owens 2007), but are also quite consevative compared to other studies, as they only consider financial assets. Indeed, Palan, Murphy, and Chavagneux (2010) estimate global offshore wealth to be $12 trillion and Henry (2012) between $21-32 trillion for 2010. Alstadsæter et al. (2017), found that 90-95% of the hidden wealth is owned by the richest percentile of society and Alstadsæter et al. (2018)show that the richest 0.01% of households is evading a quarter of their taxes.

Given the high stakes, wealth taxation and tax evasion has triggered significant debate. Oxfam in a report welcomes the EU list but criticises the weakness of this measure. In particular, the reaction of Chiara Putaturo (Oxfam’s EU policy advisor on tax and inequalities) highlights that: “EU governments have let five of the world’s worst tax havens off the hook and put the credibility of the whole blacklisting process at risk.”

Will such lists make the countries eventually comply? According to Konrad and Stolper (2016), the choice of whether or not to comply is determined by the coordination between the tax haven and the investors (who guarantee a stream of revenue) and the cost of international pressure. Oxfam indicates that the strong deterrent effect of the grey list, which forced high-level political commitments in order to avoid being blacklisted, while the blacklisting has proved ineffective.

Looking at the broader picture, Christine Lagarde argued in the Financial Times for an urgent overhaul of the system: “The public perception that large multinational companies pay little tax has led to political demands for urgent action.” The column quotes a new IMF paper, published on March 10th, that examines the international tax system, with the objective of resolving the harmful effects of tax avoidance and evasion.

Lagarde’s proposal was welcomed by the chief executive of Tax Justice Network (NGO), Alex Cobham, despite several criticisms on the timing and about destination-based cash flow tax. This new paper, signed by the IMF’s board, also focuses on the detrimental effects on public finances are particularly pronounced, as the need for revenues are more pronounced to achieve economic growth, as also recently delineated by the Economist.

On the other side of the Atlantic, the debate around tax fairness has also seen developments. In a letter published on March 8th, some of the most influential Democratic senators expressed the urgent need for more funding for the Internal Revenue Service (IRS), to achieve stronger enforcement efforts in tackling tax crimes. The IRS, in fact, estimated the average annual tax gap to be $458 billion for the years 2008-2010.

On the New York Times, Brad Setser points out that Trump’s tax reform will not solve the harmful effects of profits shifting, without closing the system of loopholes or applying a global taxation system.

Richard Murphy estimated a $1 trillion dollar tax gap for the EU, as per the Financial Times, in February: “If you look at the whole tax gap, which is the total of tax unpaid which a government thinks should be paid, it’s obvious that tax evasion is by far the biggest problem.”


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

COVID-19 has widened the income gap in Europe

Workers with low-educational levels suffered far worse than others in terms of COVID-19 related job losses during the first half of 2020 in the EU. Jobs for tertiary-educated workers even increased. Thus, the pandemic has increased income inequality, reinforcing the case for inclusive development.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: December 3, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

A European common tax space

'One of the obvious measures Europe could do in order to fill public coffers is to make sure that everybody pays fairly what they are supposed to pay, rather than general tax increases.'

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: November 3, 2020
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Policy Contribution

Financing the European Union: New Context, New Responses

With the European Union for the first time taking on debt to help finance the economic recovery from the coronavirus, new resources are needed to fund the EU budget. Various ideas have been floated – including a digital tax and a financial transactions tax – but the most appropriate new resource would be revenues from the EU emissions trading system, which could provide enough funding to repay the EU's coronavirus borrowing.

By: Clemens Fuest and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 11, 2020
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

Bruegel Annual Meetings 2020 - Day 3

Third day of Bruegel Annual Meetings.

Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation, Global Economics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: September 3, 2020
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

Can households in the European Union make ends meet?

Half the households surveyed by Eurostat see themselves as unable to find the resources they would need to cope with an unexpected expense within a month, estimated by experts at €375 in the case of Greece.

By: Maria Demertzis, Marta Domínguez-Jiménez, Annamaria Lusardi and Bruegel Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 24, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

COVID-19: The self-employed are hardest hit and least supported

Self-employed workers are hardest-hit by COVID-19 lockdowns. Yet they often receive less government support than salaried employees. Is the disparity justified?

By: Julia Anderson Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: April 8, 2020
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

How COVID-19 is laying bare inequality

COVID-19 is laying bare socio-economic inequalities and could exacerbate them in the near future. The virus is a risk factor particularly for those at the lower end of the income distribution, who are vulnerable to the interaction of the shock with income, socio-economic and urban inequalities.

By: Enrico Bergamini Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: March 31, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The future of taxation in the EU: tax solidarity

Tadeusz Kościński, the Minister of Finance of Poland, talked about taxation policy in the EU.

Speakers: Piotr Arak, Agnès Bénassy-Quéré, Maria Teresa Fabregas Fernandez, Tadeusz Kościński and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 17, 2020
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

The quality and quantity of work in the age of AI

At this event, the panelists will discuss the implications of Artificial Intelligence on the labour market and the future of work in general.

Speakers: Robert Atkinson, Anna Byhovskaya, Maria Demertzis, Carl Frey and Daniel Samaan Topic: Innovation & Competition Policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: February 5, 2020
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

External Publication

Manufacturing employment, international trade, and China

The decline in manufacturing employment is often seen as a major reason for rising inequality, social tensions, and the slump of entire communities. With the rise of national populists and protectionists in recent years, the issue has become even more prominent.

By: Uri Dadush and Abdelaziz Ait Ali Topic: Global Economics & Governance Date: November 28, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Cross-border, but not national, EU interregional development projects are associated with higher growth

Our calculations reveal that places where EU regional development projects bind together participants from different countries experience higher economic growth. Purely national interregional projects, on the other hand, are not associated with such benefits. The results hold across regions of different levels of income and consider the effects of other growth-determinants. Cross-border projects might bring efficiency gains, unlock synergies and provide knowledge transfers, boosting activity, with gains going beyond the projects’ scope. Cross-border projects could provide perhaps the only rationale for the continued cohesion/regional funding of more developed regions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, Jan Mazza, Catarina Midões and Bruegel Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: October 14, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

Germany’s Divided Soul

Eastern Germans vote, think, and feel differently than western Germans do, as the results of the September 1 regional elections make clear. To help tackle the underlying economic causes of this divide, the federal government should introduce incentives to encourage foreign investment in the east of the country.

By: Dalia Marin and Bruegel Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: September 13, 2019
Load more posts