Opinion

Addressing social problems should be at the heart of Europe’s economic strategy

Europe has overcome the most acute financial crisis. But failure to address more forcefully the growing social problems will undermine debt sustainability, the future prospects of a generation and support for one of the most important cross-border integration projects in history. A social revolt could well undo globalisation and undermine the basis of our prosperity.

By: Date: May 8, 2014 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

See policy brief ‘Europe’s social problem and its implications for economic growth‘ and interactive map ‘Europe’s social polarisation and the generational struggle

This opinion has been published in Nikkei, Les Echos, Il Sole 24 Ore, Handelsblatt, Figelyo and others.

The priorities for European economic policy in the last few years have been to calm the sovereign debt crisis and to address the fragmentation of the financial system. But a bigger threat is stalking Europe: the risk of permanent social fragmentation that might well turn into a revolt against the political elites and end the support for European integration, open and global markets and the euro. Trust in the EU and for national governments has dropped almost everywhere since 2008, most dramatically in Cyprus, Spain, Greece and Portugal. A great majority of people – 80% according to Eurobarometer – also believe that poverty has increased in their own country. More than 6 million jobs have been lost in the EU since 2008 and material deprivation has increased substantially in the hardest hit countries, especially among the young.

The situation is not only appalling in itself and contrary to the goals set out in the European Union treaty, it is also an enormous economic black hole. Unemployment undermines growth because of the loss of important skills. In particular, youth unemployment has a lasting negative impact on productivity, health and educational performance. The countries of southern Europe and the Baltic states, which were hardest hit by the crisis, already had high levels of income inequality before the crisis. To compensate for inequality, some relied on excessive household borrowing. The resulting debt overhang continues to undermine growth. Policies that address unemployment, poverty and income inequality therefore promise increased growth, more sustainable public debt and greater social and political stability. 

A priority is the reform of social security systems. Greece and Spain used around 16-18% of their GDP for social protection prior to the crisis, but this reduced income inequality by only 20% while Denmark and Sweden reduced their levels of income inequality by about 45% with the same proportion of spending. Clearly, significant efficiency gains are possible for the “Mediterranean” social model, including in France. Other national policies such as labour market laws also matter for social outcomes, and need continuous reform. On the composition of fiscal consolidation, the empirical evidence shows that pensions and spending on the elderly was preserved during the crisis, while budgets for education, families and children were cut quite substantially. Reviewing the balance of those spending cuts is indispensable to reduce the growing intergenerational divide.

A second priority is proper demand management in the EU. While fiscal consolidation in the EU crisis countries was unavoidable, no EU policy was put in place to compensate for the drop in demand. The euro area in particular needs to find ways to increase demand in Germany and other countries with fiscal space. In the crisis countries, unemployment benefits per worker were cut and the automatic stabilisers could therefore not play their full role. To avoid such pro-cyclical fiscal policy tightening, the EU needs to put in place a fiscal union, which could take the form of a common unemployment insurance scheme. An intermediate step to increase demand using European resources could be spending on common infrastructure projects financed by common project bonds.  

Finally, tax systems need to be reviewed. In particular, the philosophy that lower top marginal tax rates result in great productivity benefits has been proved wrong. Increasing inheritance taxes and to some extent wealth taxes would allow some of the burden of overcoming the crisis to be shifted onto those who have been less affected. However, such policies require European coordination and a European approach to reduce avoidance via tax havens.

Europe has overcome the most acute financial crisis. But failure to address more forcefully the growing social problems will undermine debt sustainability, the future prospects of a generation and support for one of the most important cross-border integration projects in history. A social revolt could well undo globalisation and undermine the basis of our prosperity.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint.

Due to copyright agreements we ask that you kindly email request to republish opinions that have appeared in print to [email protected].

Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

External Publication

Chinese economic statecraft: what to expect in the next five years?

Chapter from 'Storms Ahead: the Future Geoeconomic world order' on the expectations from the next five years of Chinese economic policy, published on 27 October 2021.

By: Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global economy and trade Date: November 26, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Technology: a product of unequal power?

The effects of digital technology on work and wages.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: November 24, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Phasing out COVID-19 emergency support programmes: effects on productivity and financial stability

How can European countries phase out the COVID-19 support measures without having a negative impact on productivity and financial stability?

Speakers: Eric Bartelsman, Maria Demertzis, Peter Grasmann and Laurie Mayers Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governanceInclusive growth

The socioeconomic effects of COVID-19 on women

The pandemic has disproportionately affected women both professionally and at home. Although the gender gap in labour force participation since the onset of the pandemic hasn't worsened, policy still needs to tackle existing gender gaps, which for some EU countries are very substantive.

By: Maria Demertzis and Mia Hoffmann Topic: European governance, Inclusive growth Date: November 3, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European ParliamentInclusive growth

Understanding the socioeconomic effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on women

Testimony before the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON) on the consequences of the pandemic on women.

By: Maria Demertzis and Mia Hoffmann Topic: European Parliament, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 27, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Concentration of artificial intelligence and other frontier IT skills

Online job postings indicate that demand from top tech firms for frontier IT skills is about double their demand for other IT skills. This could indicate increasing concentration of skills in a few firms, with other firms left behind.

By: Wang Jin, Georgios Petropoulos and Sebastian Steffen Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: October 21, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Making antitrust work for, not against, gig workers and the self-employed

Policymakers should act to deal with labour-market concentration trends that potentially harm workers, especially gig workers and the self-employed.

By: Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: October 11, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

Winners and losers of energy and climate policy – How can the costs be redistributed?

Who should bear more and who less of the burden achieving climate policy goals?

By: Gustav Fredriksson and Georg Zachmann Topic: Green economy Date: September 24, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How to strike the right balance between the three pillars of the pension system?

In this event panelists will discuss the future of European pension schemes.

Speakers: Elsa Fornero, Svend E. Hougaard Jensen and Suvi-Anne Siimes Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: September 23, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Inclusive growth

For remote work to work, new ground rules are needed

The pandemic has shown workers and employers that another way to work is possible. The European Union should develop a framework to facilitate hybrid work.

By: Mario Mariniello Topic: Inclusive growth Date: September 23, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Remote work, EU labour markets and wage inequality

More remote working in the wake of the pandemic could exacerbate wage inequality, with young workers, women and the low educated potentially losing out.

By: Georgios Petropoulos and Tom Schraepen Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: September 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

External Publication

A Safety Net for the Green Economy

How to protect workers hurt by the fight against climate change.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Green economy Date: July 20, 2021
Load more posts