Blog Post

Insufficient home-assignments from the European Semester

Does the European Semester deliver the right policy advice to the euro area? Unfortunately, we find the recommendations disappointing, for a number of reasons.

By: Date: September 30, 2013 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

Policy contribution – ‘Does the European Semester deliver the right policy advice?

The backbone of the EU’s economic policy coordination is the European Semester. In each year, it starts with the setting of the main priorities by the European Commission, followed by the submission and assessment of EU member states’ economic, fiscal and structural plans, and concludes with country-specific recommendations and recommendations for the euro area as a whole.

Does the European Semester deliver the right policy advice to the euro area? This was the question we tried to answer with Erkki Vihriälä in a briefing paper we wrote for the European Parliament. Unfortunately, we found the recommendations disappointing, for a number of reasons.

First, the recommendations to the euro area as whole are not really reflected by the country-specific recommendations. An example is that while the euro area recommendations call for addressing national distortions to saving and investment in both current account deficit and surplus countries, but Germany and the Netherlands (two major surplus countries) have not received specific recommendations to this end. Their large current account surpluses are not even mentioned in the recommendations. In terms of wage growth, Germany was advised to “Sustain conditions that enable wage growth to support domestic demand.”, which sounds promising, but the details on how to do this waters down the headline proposal: beyond reducing high taxes and social security contributions for low-wage earners, the second key channel is raising the educational achievement of disadvantaged people, which of course has to be a major goal, but it is unlikely to contribute in a significant way to wage growth. Also, three additional sentences call for increasing employment, which is again important, but in a country which is close to full employment (rather high labour force participation rate and low unemployment rate), it won’t deliver much.

And symmetric intra-euro area adjustments would be necessary not just for rebalancing price-competitiveness between euro-area deficit and surplus countries, but also for public debt sustainability. Competitiveness adjustment in deficit countries requires persistently lower inflation than in major trading partners, but low inflation worsens public debt sustainability. When inflation in surplus countries is low (eg below two percent), inflation has to be even lower in southern Europe, undermining debt sustainability, as I argued in another paper we published earlier this month. Interestingly, Daniel Gros and Cinzia Alcidi from CEPS also wrote a paper on the very same topic recently.

Second, demand is not important according to the recommendations, despite the still weak cyclical position of the euro-area economy. Investment is not a priority, even in countries with healthy public and private balance sheets and very low investment rates, like Germany.

Third, the concept of the “aggregate fiscal stance of the euro area” is a largely empty concept – even though it is emphasised in the euro area recommendations. The ideal aggregate fiscal stance of the euro area is not specified, and consequently not allocated between countries. Instead, the fiscal strategy continues to reflect a consolidation bias, which is not consistent with the economic situation of the euro area. The issue is not a return to ‘failed old debt-making policies’ in highly indebted countries (in these countries fiscal consolidation was necessary and has to continue at an appropriate pace), but to ensure fiscal stabilisation at the euro-area level as long as private demand is weak.

Fourth, the suggestions for financial sector repair go in the right direction, but remain too timid. Although the euro-area recommendations include a call to limit national supervisory incentives for re-nationalisation of bank assets and liabilities, this is absent from the country-specific recommendations. Another issue that is not properly addressed is the general undercapitalisation of the European banking system, which extends to the core countries.

The most comprehensive recommendations are on structural reforms aimed at improving the functioning of labour and product markets and making the business environment more growth-friendly, and on improving public finance management.

Therefore, and not very surprisingly, the recommendations very much reflect the general view on economic policies of the European Commission and Germany, placing strong emphasis on structural reforms and almost no emphasis on demand. Even the straitjacket of the European economic governance framework is not exploited sufficiently. I 100% agree that structural reforms are essential, but they can help at best in the medium- to long-term, while lack of growth in the short-term will have harmful impact on long-term growth too, as I argued here. Have the EU’s economic policies been successful so far, as claimed by several policymakers recently? Well, many people think they have not, as it was nicely summarised by this week’s Bruegel Blog review.

Policy contribution – ‘Does the European Semester deliver the right policy advice?


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

European governance

Can the EU fiscal rules jump on the green bandwagon?

By and large, setting a new green golden rule would be a useful addition to the existing EU fiscal framework.

By: Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 22, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governance

Germany’s post-pandemic current account surplus

The pandemic has increased the net lending position of the German corporate sector. By incentivising private investment, policymakers could trigger a virtuous cycle of increasing wages, decreasing corporate net lending, which would eventually lead to a reduction of the economy-wide current account surplus.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 21, 2021
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

Monetary policy in the time of climate change

How does climate change influence monetary policy in the eurozone? What potential monetary policy measures should be taken up to address climate risks?

Speakers: Cornelia Holthausen, Jean Pisani-Ferry and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 20, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Rethinking fiscal policy

A look at the past, present and future of fiscal policy in the European Union with Chief economist of the European Stability Mechanism, Rolf Strauch.

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 20, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Nov
4
14:00

European monetary policy: lessons from the past two decades

This event will feature the presentation of “Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis – A Tale of Two Decades of the European Central Bank."

Speakers: Grégory Claeys and Wolfgang Lemke Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article
 

External Publication

European Parliament

Tailoring prudential policy to bank size: the application of proportionality in the US and euro area

In-depth analysis prepared for the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Alexander Lehmann and Nicolas Véron Topic: Banking and capital markets, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

External Publication

Global Economic Resilience: Building Forward Better

A roadmap for systemic economic reform calling for step-change in global economic governance to increase resilience and build forward better from economic shocks, prepared for the G7 Advisory Panel on Economic Resilience.

By: Thomas Wieser Topic: Global economy and trade, Macroeconomic policy Date: October 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

Letter: Declining investment may explain why rates are low

Perhaps an analysis of the causes of the declining investment rate would bring us closer to explaining why real interest rates are so low.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: October 1, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

A green fiscal pact

How can the European Union increase green public investment while consolidating budget deficits?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: September 29, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Monetary arithmetic and inflation risk

Between 2007 and 2020, the balance sheets of the European Central Bank, the Bank of Japan, and the Fed have all increased about sevenfold. But inflation stayed low throughout the 2010s. This was possible due to decreasing money velocity and the money multiplier. However, a continuation of asset purchasing programs by central banks involves the risk of higher inflation and fiscal dominance.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: September 28, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

The pandemic’s uncertain impact on productivity

The pandemic has certainly permanently affected our way of working. Whether this is for the better remains to be seen.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: September 28, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How to strike the right balance between the three pillars of the pension system?

In this event panelists will discuss the future of European pension schemes.

Speakers: Elsa Fornero, Svend E. Hougaard Jensen and Suvi-Anne Siimes Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: September 23, 2021
Load more posts