Blog Post

Has the U.S. outperformed the euro area due to inflation since 2007?

The nominal GDP growth differential between the U.S. and the euro area is striking: taking the latest forecasts of the European Commission into account, the U.S. outpaced the euro area by 9 percentage points in 2008-2013.

By: Date: April 30, 2013 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

The nominal GDP growth differential between the U.S. and the euro area is striking: taking the latest forecasts of the European Commission into account, the U.S. outpaced the euro area by 9 percentage points in 2008-2013.

Figure 1: Nominal GDP.
Source: AMECO database.

While both economies contracted similarly in the midst of the financial crisis, the U.S. experienced a much stronger recovery in the years thereafter. In particular since 2012, the two economies have developed with a completely different speed. To put it in numbers: The U.S. experienced an average growth rate of 2.4% in 2008-2013 while nominal GDP in the euro area on average expanded by 1.1% only. Taking only 2010-2013 into consideration, the difference in the average growth rate is even more astonishing (or shocking from a European perspective): Average U.S. growth was 3.8% compared to 1.9% in the euro area. The U.S. recovery, although having not yet yielded the wished for employment effects, seems to be decoupled from the troubles and hence years of weak growth the euro area has been facing so far.

The large nominal GDP growth differential between the two economies compares to an almost synchronous increase in consumer prices (CPI): Average consumer price inflation in the euro area and in the U.S. was almost precisely 2% in 2008-2013.

Figure 2: Consumer price indices.
Source: AMECO database.

What does this mean for the real GDP differential?

Very little, in fact. The equal increase in CPI does not imply that the growth differential in real GDP is of the same magnitude as in nominal GDP. Real GDP is calculated based on the GDP deflator as a price index, which reflects price changes of produced rather than consumed goods and services.

The GDP deflator and the CPI thus do not necessarily measure the same price changes. U.S. producer prices (measured with the GDP deflator) increased on average by 1.6% in 2008-2013 while they increased by only 1.3% in the euro area. Of the 9% difference in nominal GDP performance in 2008-2013, 3 percentage points can thus be explained by the difference in price deflators, which are unrelated to consumer price developments. A real GDP growth differential of still impressive 6 percentage points makes up for the remaining difference in 2008-2013. More work on explaining the difference between CPI and the GDP deflator seems warranted.

Figure 3: Real GDP.
Source: AMECO database. 


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Fiscal policy and rules after the pandemic

What are the possibilities for shaping the new fiscal policy?

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Maria Demertzis, Michel Heijdra and Katja Lautar Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 24, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governance

Including home-ownership costs in the inflation indicator is not just a technical issue

The European Central Bank is right to propose inclusion of owner-occupied housing services in the inflation indicator. But the ECB’s preferred method would involve an asset price in the consumer inflation indicator.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fiscal arithmetic and risk of sovereign insolvency

The record-high debt levels in advanced economies increase the risk of sovereign insolvency. Governments should start fiscal consolidation soon in an environment of low nominal and real interest rates and post-COVID growth.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global economy and trade, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

European governance

Growth and inflation after the pandemic in the EU

Countries hit comparatively hard during the financial crisis, helped also by domestic and European policies, are bouncing back from the pandemic faster than their peers.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceFrench Senate

European Union countries’ National Recovery and Resilience Plans: A cross-country comparison

Testimony before the Economic Affairs Committee of the French Senate.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European governance, French Senate, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 12, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Next Generation EU borrowing: a first assessment

The Next Generation EU programme is radically changing the way the EU finances itself and interacts with financial markets. This paper assesses the first design decisions made by the European Commission and the issuances that have taken place so far. It also outlines the potential risks and opportunities linked to this upgrading of the EU borrowing.

By: Rebecca Christie, Grégory Claeys and Pauline Weil Topic: Banking and capital markets, European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 10, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The New Euro Area Inflation Indicator and Target: The Right Reset?

Testimony to the Monetary Dialogue Preparatory Meeting of the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Phasing out COVID-19 emergency support programmes: effects on productivity and financial stability

How can European countries phase out the COVID-19 support measures without having a negative impact on productivity and financial stability?

Speakers: Eric Bartelsman, Maria Demertzis, Peter Grasmann and Laurie Mayers Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read article
 

External Publication

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The new euro area inflation indicator and target: the right reset?

In-depth analysis on the European Central Bank's revised inflation target prepared for the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

European monetary policy: lessons from the past two decades

This event will feature the presentation of “Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis – A Tale of Two Decades of the European Central Bank."

Speakers: Petra Geraats, Wolfgang Lemke, Francesco Papadia and Massimo Rostagno Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

COVID-19 financial aid and productivity: has support been well spent?

While support schemes during the pandemic were not targeted at protecting ‘good’ firms, financial support mostly went to those with the capacity to survive and succeed. Labour schemes have been effective in protecting employment.

By: Carlo Altomonte, Maria Demertzis, Lionel Fontagné and Steffen Müller Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

Does money growth tell us anything about inflation?

Attention should be paid to a possible sequence of negative events: if inflation would start to be volatile and money growth remains high, efforts to control inflation could be undermined.

By: Leonardo Cadamuro and Francesco Papadia Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Load more posts