Blog Post

Time to focus

Europe’s tardiness to come to agreement on Greece let alone the EU budget shows worrying degree of focus. This week, the European Commission has the opportunity to concentrate European economic governance on the countries and the problems that really matter. Wednesday, the European Commission is releasing its annual growth survey (AGS) and its alert mechanism […]

By: Date: November 27, 2012 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

Europe’s tardiness to come to agreement on Greece let alone the EU budget shows worrying degree of focus. This week, the European Commission has the opportunity to concentrate European economic governance on the countries and the problems that really matter. Wednesday, the European Commission is releasing its annual growth survey (AGS) and its alert mechanism report (AMR). The AGS is supposed to be the central document guiding European economic governance in the next year. It is supposed to set priorities for fiscal, macroeconomic and structural policies for the EU as a whole. The problem with such a document is that it easily is too broad and misses the focus on the real priorities. In recent papers (see An Assessment of the European Semester, October 2012; On the effectiveness and legitimacy of EU economic policies, November 2012[1]) with colleagues, we have therefore proposed to simultaneously release the AMR. The AMR is the first step of the new macroeconomic imbalance procedure that is supposed to identify countries early on that could be a source of trouble.

The last AMR of February this year failed to trigger focus in the subsequent policy debate. The AMR report had indentified 12 countries beyond the programme countries that should be observed carefully: Belgium, Bulgaria, Denmark, Spain, France, Italy, Cyprus, Hungary, Slovenia, Finland, Sweden and the United Kingdom. For all 12 countries, an in-depth report was produced.

At the same time however, European economic governance in the course of the European Semester continued to be a process putting all countries’ problems essentially on equal footing. All 27 countries of the EU received their recommendations which were discussed and endorsed in the council. Giving recommendations on fiscal and structural issues to all 27 countries makes little sense. In fact, it suggests that all countries have somehow problems and that all these problems are equally relevant.

The simultaneous release of the AMR and AGS should be used as an opportunity to re-focus European governance. Structural and macroeconomic policy recommendations should only be given to countries that are considered to have serious macroeconomic imbalances. In addition, countries such as Germany, whose actions have serious implications for the entire euro zone, should be in focus. Fiscal policy recommendations should only be given to countries under severe fiscal surveillance. That would create a European Semester that really makes sense and puts focus back on the center stage.


[1] B. Marzinotto, G. B. Wolff, M. Hallerberg, An Assessment of the European Semester, October 2012, /publications/publication-detail/publication/751-an-assessment-of-the-european-semester/

B. Marzinotto, G. B. Wolff, M. Hallerberg, On the effectiveness and legitimacy of EU economic policies, November 2012,

/publications/publication-detail/publication/758-on-the-effectiveness-and-legitimacy-of-eu-economic-policies/


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May
25
14:30

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May - Jun
31-1
10:30

MICROPROD Final Event

Improving understanding of productivity, its drivers and the way we measure it.

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Wolfhard Kaus, Javier Miranda, Steffen Müller, Verena Plümpe, Niclas Poitiers, Andrea Roventini, Gianluca Santoni, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi and Markus Zimmermann Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union

Policymakers must think coherently about the joint implications of their actions, from sanctions on Russia to subsidies and transfers to their own citizens, and avoid taking measures that contradict each other. This is what we try to do in this Policy Contribution, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects of relevance for Europe.

By: Olivier Blanchard and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

What drives implementation of the European Union’s policy recommendations to its member countries?

Article published in the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

Working Paper

Measuring the intangible economy to address policy challenges

The purpose of the first work package of the MICROPROD project was to improve the firm-level data infrastructure, expand the measurement of intangible assets and enable cross-country analyses of these productivity trends.

By: Marie Le Mouel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Macroeconomic and financial stability in changing times: conversation with Andrew Bailey

Guntram Wolff will be joined in conversation by Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

Speakers: Andrew Bailey and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 28, 2022
Read article
 

Opinion

European governance

How to reconcile increased green public investment needs with fiscal consolidation

The EU’s ambitious emissions reduction targets will require a major increase in green investments. This column considers options for increasing public green investment when major consolidations are needed after the fiscal support provided during the pandemic. The authors make the case for a green golden rule allowing green investment to be funded by deficits that would not count in the fiscal rules. Concerns about ‘greenwashing’ could be addressed through a narrow definition of green investments and strong institutional scrutiny, while countries with debt sustainability concerns could initially rely only on NGEU for their green investment.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

The week inflation became entrenched

The events that have unfolded since 24 February have solved one dispute: inflation is no longer temporary.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Load more posts