Blog Post

Chart of the week: the fiscal stance in the euro area

The size of the deficit reduction mandated by European fiscal rules for euro area countries currently under excessive deficit procedure will be on average nearly 1.5 percent of GDP per year in the next two years. While such adjustment would not be overly restrictive in normal times, it is undesirable in countries that are already in recession. The risk is particularly important in Cyprus and Spain which need to undertake cumulated fiscal adjustments of more than 6 percentage points of GDP in 2012 and 2013 in order to satisfy European fiscal rules.

By: and Date: June 25, 2012 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

The size of the deficit reduction mandated by European fiscal rules for euro area countries currently under excessive deficit procedure will be on average nearly 1.5 percent of GDP per year in the next two years. While such adjustment would not be overly restrictive in normal times, it is undesirable in countries that are already in recession. The risk is particularly important in Cyprus and Spain which need to undertake cumulated fiscal adjustments of more than 6 percentage points of GDP in 2012 and 2013 in order to satisfy European fiscal rules.

Graph 1: The cumulated size of deficit reduction over 2012-2013, % of GDP

Source: Authors’ own elaboration based on National Stability Programmes and Commission’s Spring Economic Forecast, May 2012.

 

There is much talk about fiscal austerity in the euro zone and concern is expressed about the fact that significant deficit reduction may produce large drops in output, which is undesirable in bad times. What is the exact size of deficit reduction over the next two years?

We calculated the size of deficit reduction in all the countries that are at present under excessive deficit procedure and need to correct excessive nominal deficits either by 2012 (Cyprus and Belgium) or by 2013 (all others, excluding Estonia, Finland, Luxembourg and the three programme countries Greece, Ireland and Portugal, which have their own timetable).

We distinguish between corrective measures that have already been envisaged in the national Stability Programmes of April 2012, which we classify as “planned”, and the extraordinary measures that are not planned but deemed necessary to obey by the agreed deadlines for correction; these are classified as “extra” and are calculated as the distance of the deficit level forecasted by the Commission from the 3%-of-GDP level in the target year. As the Commission’s forecast for 2013 does not include the fiscal policy measures that will be implemented in 2013, we assume quite optimistically that national fiscal plans perfectly anticipate fiscal policy outputs in 2013.

Over 2012-2013, the average cumulated planned fiscal contraction is 2.75 percent of GDP, thus an annual cut of 1.4 percent, which is certainly not desirable in bad times but it is not dramatic either. The average cumulated fiscal contraction (including both planned and extraordinary interventions) reaches 3 percent of GDP over the two years, leaving the annual adjustment effort at 1.5 percent of GDP.

What is but striking is the large cross-country variation with a very restrictive fiscal stance especially in Spain and Cyprus, as both should go through a cumulated deficit reduction in 2012 and 2013 that is above 6 percent of GDP.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May
25
14:30

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May - Jun
31-1
10:30

MICROPROD Final Event

Final conference of the MICROPROD project

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Filippo di Mauro, Wolfhard Kaus, Steffen Müller, Gianluca Santoni, Verena Plümpe, Andrea Roventini, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi, Markus Zimmermann and Javier Miranda Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union

Policymakers must think coherently about the joint implications of their actions, from sanctions on Russia to subsidies and transfers to their own citizens, and avoid taking measures that contradict each other. This is what we try to do in this Policy Contribution, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects of relevance for Europe.

By: Olivier Blanchard and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

What drives implementation of the European Union’s policy recommendations to its member countries?

Article published in the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

Working Paper

Measuring the intangible economy to address policy challenges

The purpose of the first work package of the MICROPROD project was to improve the firm-level data infrastructure, expand the measurement of intangible assets and enable cross-country analyses of these productivity trends.

By: Marie Le Mouel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Macroeconomic and financial stability in changing times: conversation with Andrew Bailey

Guntram Wolff will be joined in conversation by Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

Speakers: Andrew Bailey and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 28, 2022
Read article
 

Opinion

European governance

How to reconcile increased green public investment needs with fiscal consolidation

The EU’s ambitious emissions reduction targets will require a major increase in green investments. This column considers options for increasing public green investment when major consolidations are needed after the fiscal support provided during the pandemic. The authors make the case for a green golden rule allowing green investment to be funded by deficits that would not count in the fiscal rules. Concerns about ‘greenwashing’ could be addressed through a narrow definition of green investments and strong institutional scrutiny, while countries with debt sustainability concerns could initially rely only on NGEU for their green investment.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

The week inflation became entrenched

The events that have unfolded since 24 February have solved one dispute: inflation is no longer temporary.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Load more posts