Blog Post

The Weekender

Dear All, It has been an eventful week with financial instability in Europe over the last few weeks translating into very weak high frequency survey (PMI). A growth agenda is therefore probably urgent but the fiscal and monetary multipliers will remain extraordinarily low across the euro area so long as financial instability persists. This should therefore be addressed as a priority. The increasing capital injection for Bankia, the expansion in the activated guarantees of Dexia, the substandard recapitalization process in Greece all call for a more comprehensive response and certainly one that no member state alone can deliver. Luckily, the “informal” European Council has been the occasion of bringing this discussion to the fore. It has remained quite superficial but it is the first time that HoSG have discussed the possibility of a banking union in such a clear language and evoked Eurobonds so precisely. President Von Rompuy has been tasked to prepare a report on the necessary steps to strengthen the monetary union including “eurobonds in a time perspective, a more integrated banking supervision and resolution, and a common deposit insurance scheme.” This is very encouraging although achieving deliverables is urgent and unlikely by June, in the meantime there are two challenges to keep in mind: 1. Banking Union, bail-in and the risk of another Deauville moment 2. Eurobonds but what Eurobonds?

By: Date: May 29, 2012 Topic: Global economy and trade

Dear All,

It has been an eventful week with financial instability in Europe over the last few weeks translating into very weak high frequency survey (PMI). A growth agenda is therefore probably urgent but the fiscal and monetary multipliers will remain extraordinarily low across the euro area so long as financial instability persists. This should therefore be addressed as a priority. The increasing capital injection for Bankia, the expansion in the activated guarantees of Dexia, the substandard recapitalization process in Greece all call for a more comprehensive response and certainly one that no member state alone can deliver.

Luckily, the “informal” European Council has been the occasion of bringing this discussion to the fore. It has remained quite superficial but it is the first time that HoSG have discussed the possibility of a banking union in such a clear language and evoked Eurobonds so precisely. President Von Rompuy has been tasked to prepare a report on the necessary steps to strengthen the monetary union including “eurobonds in a time perspective, a more integrated banking supervision and resolution, and a common deposit insurance scheme.” This is very encouraging although achieving deliverables is urgent and unlikely by June, in the meantime there are two challenges to keep in mind:

1.    Banking Union, bail-in and the risk of another Deauville moment

2.    Eurobonds but what Eurobonds?

Banking Union, bail-in and the risk of a new Deauville moment

It is somewhat reassuring to see that the many calls for a banking union are finally being heard. European policymakers will need to make progress quickly on a least 3 complementary and necessary dimensions:

i. A deposit guarantee scheme either through a backstop of national guarantee scheme (by the ESM for instance), or through a direct supranational guarantee scheme in replacement of existing ones (which is probably going to take longer).

 ii. A resolution / restructuring framework. This will require some ad hoc involvement of existing institutions before a new, permanent one is created and probably lodged within the ESM (see my column Irish shadow in the Spanish deadend for more on this). In the short-term, the ECB has to be involved, the EBA and the Commission, all reporting directly to the president of the eurogroup for political accountability purposes. They would form the embryo of a European FDIC and should start their first case with Spain soon

iii. A truly supranational supervision framework building on the existing institutions but changing profoundly their current relationships, moving from subsidiarity to a clear hierarchical structure with appropriate governance and accountability mechanisms.

Yet over the last two years or so, given the absence of political will on these questions (in fact outright rejection), the European Commission has spent more time working on “automatic” resolution mechanisms that would basically achieve orderly resolution and recapitalization through the use of so-called bail-in (basically the orderly conversion of subordinated debt into equity at times of crisis).

Commissioner Barnier seems ready to publish imminently a long awaited Communication on the matter. The Commission has been somewhat forced to focus on bail in as a substitute to a banking union, in the absence of political progress and traction on other key aspects of crisis of resolution which it has worked on extensively (see here).

The major risk is that financial markets perceive the bail-in as an essential building block of the new resolution framework. I personally think it should be an essential element to protect taxpayers resources in the context of banking crisis but it is only a complement to the elements listed above and not a substitute.

As far as timing is concerned, the reality is that bail-in instruments are important to deal with the future banking crisis in Europe but they come too late to deal with the current one (which doesn’t mean subordinated creditors cannot and shouldn’t be haircut if necessary). Hence, the appropriate timing is to clarify first the banking resolution framework, the deposit guarantee scheme and then the supervision and the bail in provisions, not the other way around.

This order is important and is very similar to the discussion on CACs in the case of fiscal crises and sovereign debt. It is true that CACs can be a very useful instrument, but introducing a conversation about CACs at Deauville in 2010 hasn’t done much to solve the current crisis and has probably made financing conditions for sovereign more challenging. It is quite possible that the bail-in discussion, although very important in and for itself, could have two undesired consequences: pollute the political discussion on the shape and form of banking union, create more harm than good by making funding conditions for banks more difficult than they already are.

Eurobonds but what Eurobonds?

With growing intellectual and political acceptance that Eurobonds are part of the solution to the current crisis, Germany seems increasingly cornered. Yet the debate has been sufficiently vague and has consistently ignored important details of the many different proposals such that Germany still holds an important advantage in the sense that if it accepts the idea of Eurobonds it can largely choose the type of Eurobonds it wants.

In a forthcoming research, we look at the different proposals and conclude that the different Eurobonds proposals discussed in policy circles have important idiosyncratic merits that make it useful to think of them as complement rather than substitute. In this case, the important and complicated exercise is to combine and sequence the different proposals intelligently and effectively.

I attach slides outlining two potential paths slides outlining two potential paths  (there are many others). The first one, is the one that Germany could try to sell to its partners. It builds largely on the sachverstaendigenrat’s European Redemption Fund (which the German government had originally rejected). The proposal has received since clear backing by the opposition (SPD and Greens) and is the one proposal that the European Parliament has strongly endorsed.

I contend that this is not the only avenue and that there are potentially other, more effective ones. This seems to be the view of Hollande, who made it clear during his press conference on Wednesday: “Moi j’ai une autre conception, les Eurobonds (…) ça peut être l’occasion de mutualiser non pas une dette passée mais une dette future pour permettre à des Etats (…) de pouvoir accéder plus facilement au marché”.

I suspect Hollande’s position would be closer to the second path outlined, which builds on project bonds and on eurobills as first steps towards Eurobonds. There will therefore be a very intense debate not only at the coming European Council but also during the subsequent ones about the exact nature, shape and form of common debt issuance in the euro area.

Happy to have your thoughts as usual,

Shahin Vallée


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

Three data realms: Managing the divergence between the EU, the US and China in the digital sphere

Major economies are addressing the challenges brought by digital trade in different ways, resulting in diverging regulatory regimes. How should we view these divergences and best deal with them?

Speakers: Susan Ariel Aaronson, Henry Gao, Esa Kaunistola and Niclas Poitiers Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Global economy and trade Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 19, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May
25
14:30

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Is China’s private sector advancing or retreating?

A look into the Chinese private sector.

Speakers: Reinhard Bütikofer, Nicolas Véron and Alicia García-Herrero Topic: Global economy and trade Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 18, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May - Jun
31-1
10:30

MICROPROD Final Event

Final conference of the MICROPROD project

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Wolfhard Kaus, Javier Miranda, Steffen Müller, Verena Plümpe, Niclas Poitiers, Andrea Roventini, Gianluca Santoni, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi and Markus Zimmermann Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article
 

Blog Post

The EU needs transparent oil data and enhanced coordination

The EU lacks the coordination structure and transparent data necessary to most effectively navigate an embargo on Russian oil.

By: Agata Łoskot-Strachota, Ben McWilliams and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade, Green economy Date: May 16, 2022
Read article
 

Blog Post

Now is not the time to confiscate Russia’s central bank reserves

The idea of confiscating the Bank of Russia’s frozen reserves is attractive to some, but at this stage in the Ukraine conflict confiscation would be counterproductive and likely illegal.

By: Nicolas Véron and Joshua Kirschenbaum Topic: Banking and capital markets, Global economy and trade Date: May 16, 2022
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

The cost of China's dynamic zero-COVID policy

What does zero-COVID mean for both China and the global economy?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 11, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

Opinion

For Europe, an oil embargo is not the way to go

Even at this late hour, the European Union should consider taking a different path.

By: Simone Tagliapietra, Guntram B. Wolff and Georg Zachmann Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 9, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Jun
23
14:00

BRI 2.0: How has the pandemic influenced China’s landmark Belt and Road Initiative?

China's Belt and Road Initiative is undergoing a transformation after two years of pandemic. How is it changing and what are the consequences for Europe.

Speakers: Alessia Amighini, Eyck Freymann, Alicia García-Herrero and Zhang Xiaotong Topic: Global economy and trade Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Load more posts