Blog Post

Germany: What about Eurobonds?

While the Federal Government is opposed to the idea of  Eurobonds, the German Council of Economic Experts recommends the establishment of a European Redemption Pact, under which a country could refinance itself through the European Redemption Fund (ERF) up to the point where the debt refinanced reached the current difference between the debt outstanding and […]

By: Date: May 31, 2012 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

While the Federal Government is opposed to the idea of  Eurobonds, the German Council of Economic Experts recommends the establishment of a European Redemption Pact, under which a country could refinance itself through the European Redemption Fund (ERF) up to the point where the debt refinanced reached the current difference between the debt outstanding and the hypothetical debt that would equate 60% of GDP. There appears to be a swing in the debate on ERF and the opposition seems to increasingly demand this in exchange for support on the fiscal compact.

In the official German 2012 Annual Economic Report of the economics ministry both, the federal government and the German Council of Economic Experts reject the idea of Eurobonds. The report, however, mentions the idea of setting up a debt redemption pact proposed by the Council of Economic Experts if the stabilization measures already agreed were to prove inadequate.

This corresponds to official statements  by Wolfgang Schäuble’s or Angela Merkel’s, who underlines notably the incompatibility between the bonds and EU treaties. FDP leader Rainer Brüderle precludes the introduction of Eurobonds in the short or medium run and calls them “Zinssozialismus” (Interest socialism) in an interview with Die Welt. “Savoir-vivre cannot mean that a few have to pay, while the rest enjoy.” In an interview with Le Monde on 25 May 2012, Bundesbank President Jens Weidmann states that “believing Eurobonds would solve the current crisis is an illusion”. “You do not confide your credit card to someone without any possibility to control his expenditures.”  Volker Kauder, Chairman of the Christian Democratic Union/ Christian Social Union (CDU/CSU) parliamentary group in the Bundestag, expresses on the blog of the CDU/CSU on 25 May 2012 his position against Eurobonds.

Apparently, Merkel gets recently support from the opposition on the issue. SPD leader Sigmar Gabriel does not support the creation of commonly guaranteed debt and Grünen leader Jürgen Trittin says that Eurobonds necessitate a modification of the treaties, which is not possible in the short run.

While the Federal Government reaffirms its opposition to the introduction of the European redemption fund (ERF) there seems to be a change in orientation among opposition representatives according to the Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung on 24 May 2012. The SPD officially proposes the introduction of ERF and the Grünen approve the idea of the ERF that, according to Trittin, “combines the advantages of low interest rates through common European bonds with debt reductions”. This u-turn is linked to the forthcoming vote on the European Fiscal Pact in June that needs a two-thirds majority in both Bundestag and Bundesrat. SPD and Grüne require the introduction of ERF as one condition for their approval of the Fiscal Pact. Trittin told Reuters that the Chancellor “has to modify her financial and economic Policy if she wants to have the Fiscal Pact ratified.” Moreover, “she has to give up her blockade to ERF.”  According to Gabriel the Federal Government is “still opposed” to the proposal of ERF, which represent for him a good alternative to Eurobonds by reason of clearer conditions.

According to Reuters the next council between the coalition and opposition will be held on 13 June. The Federal Government will until then work out the propositions of the SPD and Grüne including the introduction of the ERF.

Bloggers and commentators often oppose the idea of Eurobonds.  Thomas Hanke states in the Handelsblatt on 29 May 2012 (subscribed version) that Eurobonds are certainly not an instrument to achieve more growth in the next months in Europe, Wolfram Weimer in the Handelsblatt argues that Eurobonds constitute nothing other than the socialization of national debt at the expense of Germany and  Günter K.V. Vetter on Karpfenteich supports Angela Merkel in her opposition to Eurobonds.

Others have a more differentiated view on this. Claus Hulverscheidt in the Süddeutsche Zeitung on 24 May 2012 quotes Brüderle saying that introducing Eurobonds now would be the same as “giving whiskey to an alcoholic”, but that their introduction may be possible in the long run. Brüderle’s statement is surprising given that the FDP considered until now the Eurobonds as absolute taboo, even in the long run. Hulverscheidt agrees with Brüderle, that Eurobonds have to be the final step of the European integration process. Merkel should send this signal to her European partners.

Wolfgang Münchau writes on 23 May 2012 in the Spiegel that the SPD do not have the courage to claim “real” Eurobonds and misses by that a opportunity to advance in the European integration due to a “lack of killer instinct”. 

André Kühnlenz writes on 24 May 2012 in the Financial Times Deutschland that Eurobonds may help to stop the exodus of capital that is currently escalating in Spain and Italy. He agrees basically with the idea of the Bundesbank that we need a fiscal union before the introduction of Eurobonds, but, he thinks that there is not enough time and a solution is needed until the summer in order to preserve the euro. He refers to Yanis Varoufakis, who envisaged in his paper a type of Eurobonds that could be introduced without changing the EU treaties.  According to Kühnlenz, it is clear that the Euro zone will not settle its current problems without Eurobonds. If Europe still wants to play a role in the world, it must jump over its own shadow.

Kantoos finds Varoufakis’ proposal of ECB bonds less convincing. The latter involves the ECB issuing bonds on the member states’ behalf, having the states pay off their debt at the ECB, and having the EFSF/ESM guarantee the losses of the ECB “in the remote case that some members do not redeem their bonds in the distant future.”Sure, ECB bonds would probably have German rates, which would be fair. However, it is not clear who would stand behind these ECB bonds – either the (recapitalized) ECB, or the insurance by the EFSF/ ESM. Thus, in the end, the other European governments would have to pay. Moreover, issuing ECB bonds would increase the yields on other bonds. Therefore, he does not consider the ECB bonds as a real alternative and thinks that they are very close to the commonly proposed Eurobonds.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article
 

Blog Post

Will European Union recovery spending be enough to fill digital investment gaps?

The recovery facility will boost digital transformation, but questions remain whether it will be sufficient to achieve Europe’s digital ambitions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, J. Scott Marcus and Alkiviadis Tzaras Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 20, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1
12:30

The EU recovery fund - state of play and outlook

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 1- In this session we will discuss the EU recovery fund, its state of play and outlook.

Speakers: Nadia Calviño, Karolina Ekholm and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:00

Conversation on the recovery programmes

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session, we discuss the recovery programmes.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Henry Foy and Tadeusz Kościński Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
13:00

European banks: under global competitive pressure?

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - European banks have lost stature and remain generally low-profitability, low-valuation in comparison to their global peers. Is that a problem? If so, what can EU policymakers do to address it?

Speakers: José Antonio Álvarez Álvarez, Mairead McGuinness and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
15:45

Blending physical and virtual: shaping the new workplace

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - This panel will cover the changes the COVID-19 pandemic made to our workplaces, and what to expect in the near future.

Speakers: Nicholas Bloom, Michael Froman, Mario Mariniello, Sara Matthieu and Luca Visentini Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Academy Palace
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
09:00

The role of the EU's trade strategy for an inclusive and sustainable recovery

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - We are delighted to welcome Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People to talk about Europe's trade strategy.

Speakers: Valdis Dombrovskis, Alicia García-Herrero and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Conference on the Future of Europe: envisioning EU citizens engagement

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - Panellists will discuss different options and what they may entail while revisiting the debates on the future of Europe at national and EU-level that have been conducted thus far.

Speakers: Caroline de Gruyter, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Niclas Poitiers and György Szapáry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

A new direction for the European Union’s half-hearted semiconductor strategy

The EU needs a more targeted strategy to increase its presence in this strategic and thriving sector, building on its existing strengths, while accommodating its relatively low domestic needs.

By: Niclas Poitiers and Pauline Weil Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Fair vaccine access is a goal Europe cannot afford to miss – July update

European countries must do more to tackle the vaccine uptake gap. Vaccination data should be published at the maximum granularity level so researchers and local decision-makers can monitor progress.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Mario Mariniello Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

SPACs in the gap

Special-purpose acquisition vehicles could fill a gap in European equity markets and lure risk-averse investors off the sidelines.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts