Blog Post

Microdata for macroeconomics

What’s at stake: Over the last few years, there has been a significant increase in the use of microdata to address macroeconomic questions. Microeconomic data in the form of state level data or even zip-code level data has been used to address traditional macroeconomic questions such as the size of policy multipliers and to test alternative macroeconomic theories. An important advantage of this approach for investigating policy multipliers is the ability to control for other contemporary macro shocks. Another advantage of the use of microeconomic data in the form of zip code level data is that it can isolate channels much more effectively than traditional aggregate datasets, and hence more easily test alternative explanations of a same phenomenon. The difficulty of the approach generally lies in the translation of these cross-section estimates of policy multipliers or channels into estimates for the aggregate economy.

By: Date: March 2, 2012 Topic: Uncategorized

What’s at stake: Over the last few years, there has been a significant increase in the use of microdata to address macroeconomic questions. Microeconomic data in the form of state level data or even zip-code level data has been used to address traditional macroeconomic questions such as the size of policy multipliers and to test alternative macroeconomic theories. An important advantage of this approach for investigating policy multipliers is the ability to control for other contemporary macro shocks. Another advantage of the use of microeconomic data in the form of zip code level data is that it can isolate channels much more effectively than traditional aggregate datasets, and hence more easily test alternative explanations of a same phenomenon. The difficulty of the approach generally lies in the translation of these cross-section estimates of policy multipliers or channels into estimates for the aggregate economy.

Microdata and policy multipliers: better identification, harder interpretation

The debate on the size of fiscal multipliers illustrates the advantages and drawbacks of using microdata to investigate macroeconomic questions.

As noted by Valerie Ramey in her recent literature review on the size of fiscal multipliers, the empirical literature based on aggregate data has generated a wide range of estimates for fiscal multipliers. Estimates range from less than one (or even close to zero) to almost 3 as in Alan Aeurbach and Yuriy Goronichenko. The basic problem is that, even if the fiscal shocks are well identified, in the sense that they are driven by current or expected changes in economic activity, they, nonetheless, often suffer from omitted-variable bias. Valerie Ramey and Matthew Shapiro, for example, identify military build-ups through a narrative approach and find a multiplier below one. But as pointed by Christina Romer – in a recent speech reviewing the empirical evidence on the impact of fiscal policy – other developments affecting output, such as tax increases to pay for the wars, or some other disruptions, such as rationing, came along with these major military actions. In addition, empirical approaches based on aggregate data often have a hard time controlling for the reaction of the central bank.

The empirical literature based on disaggregated data has significantly reduced that range of these estimates. The main advantage of using disaggregated data – for example data for US states – is that these common macroeconomic factors get washed out in the empirical analysis. An increasing number of papers have, thus, relied on this approach of using cross-sections or panels of states to estimate the effects of an increase in government spending. These papers typically find multipliers of about 1.5 (an exception is this recent paper by Cohen, Coval and Malloy). Gabriel Chodorow-Reich and al. use, for example, a state’s pre-recession Medicaid spending level to instrument for ARRA state fiscal relief and find a multiplier in that range. So does, Daniel Shoag who use changes in state spending caused by excess returns to state pension fund returns. Emi Nakamura and Jon Steinsson also find a similar number using state-specific sensitivity to aggregate changes in military spending as an instrument. Using changes in federal spending on states caused by updates of population estimates based on the Census as an instrument, Juan Carlos Suarez Serrato and Philippe Wingender also find a number in that range.

In an important paper, Emi Nakamura and Jon Steinsson sketch a framework to translate these cross-section estimates into estimates of the aggregate impact of spending changes. The framework is imperfect but help clarify a couple of important points. In particular, it outlines that the number recovered from cross-sectional studies is not akin to the aggregate multiplier at the ZLB. Since the nominal interest rate is fixed across regions, one might think that the number obtained would be akin to the closed economy aggregate multiplier when nominal interest rates are fixed at the zero lower bound, in which case the New Keynesian model generates large multipliers (as in Gauti Eggertsson or Christiano, Eichenbaum and Rebelo). But this is not the case. This simple intuition ignores a crucial dynamic aspect of price responses in a monetary union like the United States. Since transitory demand shocks do not lead to permanent changes in relative prices across regions and the exchange rate is fixed within the monetary union, any increase in prices in the short run in one region relative to the other must eventually be reversed in the long run. This implies that even though relative short-term real interest rates fall in response to government spending shocks, relative long-term real interest rates don’t (in contrast to the zero lower bound setting). It is the fall in long-term real interest rates that generates a high multiplier in the zero lower bound setting.

Lessons on the Great Recession from microeconomic data

In a recent AER paper, Atif Mian and Amir Sufi point out that, in contrast to our peers in previous crises, we are fortunate to have access to large-scale microeconomic data sets and advancements in computational capacity. These advantages allow for a more rigorous analysis of the current recession and therefore a more informed understanding of its origins, propagation, and consequences. The authors review empirical contributions based on micro-level analysis to illustrate how this methodology provides us with important clues to understand the origins of the crisis, the link between credit and asset prices, the feedback effect from asset prices to the real economy, and the role of household leverage in explaining the downturn.

A telling example of that approach concerns the factors behind the rise in leverage in the years ahead of the crisis. From a policy perspective, it is important to understand whether a rise in leverage was driven by demand-side productivity shocks or supply-side financial factors. If the credit expansion was due to positive productivity or technology shocks, the subsequent crisis represents an “unlucky” event associated with realized shocks, which were not as positive as anticipated. If such a view were correct, there would be no role for public policy: credit booms result from productivity-driven shifts in the demand for credit and should therefore be left alone. A supply-driven rise in leverage may, on the other hand, not be innocuous. For example, if leverage growth is driven by risk shifting supply-side incentives such as regulatory arbitrage or expectations of government bailouts, then there may be a role for intervention to realign incentives. In a 2009 QJE paper, the authors show that contrary to the predictions of a productivity-based credit expansion hypothesis, zip codes that saw the largest increase in home purchase mortgage originations from 2002 to 2005 experienced relative declines in income. More broadly, they show that the correlation between mortgage growth and income growth is negative from 2002 to 2005 while the correlation is positive in all other periods since 1990.

In a recent working paper, Atif Mian and Amir Sufi also investigate competing explanations for the extent of job losses since the beginning of the crisis. The authors derive cross-sectional testable predictions associated with three classes of models: models that emphasize the importance of uncertainty (in particular policy uncertainty), models that emphasize structural unemployment related to construction, and models that emphasize the aggregate demand channel following a shock to HH balance sheets. In particular, the aggregate demand channel for unemployment predicts that employment losses in the non-tradable sector are higher in high leverage U.S. counties that were most severely impacted by the balance sheet shock, while losses in the tradable sector are distributed uniformly across all counties. The authors find exactly this pattern from 2007 to 2009, and do not find patterns in the data that are consistent with the two other explanations.

How microdata can help policymaking

In a previous issue of the blogs review, we emphasized that the availability of high frequency data can improve policymaking by improving nowcasting. Atif Mian and Amir Sufi point that the widespread availability of microeconomic data has greatly enhanced our ability to understand the fundamental driving forces behind macroeconomic fluctuations and credit cycles. Micro-level data is now widely available for key variables of interest such as bank loans, house prices, consumer borrowing, spending, and defaults. These data are updated at quarterly frequency or higher, making them highly useful – not only to researchers investigating the past – but also for policy work. As an example, the authors points that their analysis of the increase in leverage from their 2009 QJE paper could have been done at the time of these ongoing developments.

*Bruegel Economic Blogs Review is an information service that surveys external blogs. It does not survey Bruegel’s own publications, nor does it include comments by Bruegel authors.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

It’s hard to live in the city: Berlin’s rent freeze and the economics of rent control

A proposal in Berlin to ban increases in rent for the next five years sparked intense debate in Germany. Similar policies to the Mietendeckel are currently being discussed in London and NYC. All three proposals reflect and raise similar concerns – the increase in per-capita incomes is not keeping pace with increases in rents, but will a cap do more harm than good? We review recent views on the matter.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: July 8, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The breakdown of the covered interest rate parity condition

A textbook condition of international finance breaks down. Economic research identifies the interplay between divergent monetary policies and new financial regulation as the source of the puzzle, and generates concerns about unintended consequences for financing conditions and financial stability.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets Date: July 1, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The June Eurogroup meeting: Reflections on BICC

The Eurogroup met on June 13th to discuss the deepening of the economic and monetary union (EMU) and prepare the discussions for the Euro Summit. From the meeting came two main deliverables: an agreement over a budgetary instrument for competitiveness and convergence and the reform of the European Stability Mechanism (ESM) treaty texts. We review economists’ first impressions.

By: Bruegel and Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: June 24, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The campaign against ‘nonsense’ output gaps

A campaign against “nonsense” consensus output gaps has been launched on social media. It has triggered responses focusing on the implications of output gaps for fiscal policy under EU rules, especially for Italy. But the debate about the reliability of output-gap estimates is more wide-ranging.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Bruegel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: June 17, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The inverted yield curve

Longer-term yields falling below shorter-term yields have historically preceded recessions. Last week, the US 10-year yield was 21 basis points below the 3-month yield, a feat last seen during the summer of 2007. Is the current yield curve a trustworthy barometer for future growth?

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: Global economy and trade Date: June 11, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The 'seven' ceiling: China's yuan in trade talks

Investors and the public have been looking at the renminbi with caution after the Trump administration threatened to increase duties on countries that intervene in the markets to devalue/undervalue their currency relative to the dollar. The fear is that China could weaponise its currency following the further increase in tariffs imposed by the United States in early May. What is the likelihood of this happening and what would be the consequences for the existing tensions with the United States, as well as for the global economy?

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: Global economy and trade Date: June 3, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

The next ECB president

On May 28th, EU heads of state and government will start the nomination process for the next ECB president. Leaving names of possible candidates aside, this review tries to isolate the arguments about what qualifications the new president should have and what challenges he or she is likely to face.

By: Bruegel and Konstantinos Efstathiou Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: May 27, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

The latest European growth-rate estimates

The quarterly growth rate of the euro area in Q1 2019 was 0.4% (1.5% annualized), considerably higher than the low growth rates of the previous two quarters. This blog reviews the reaction to the release of these numbers and the discussion they have triggered about the euro area’s economic challenges.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: May 20, 2019
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Is an electric car a cleaner car?

An article published by the Ifo Institute in Germany compares the carbon footprint of a battery-electric car to that of a diesel car, and argues a higher share of electric cars will not contribute to reducing German carbon dioxide emissions. Respondents rejected the authors’ calculations as unrealistic and biased, and pointed to a series of studies that conclude the opposite. We summarise the article and responses to it.

By: Michael Baltensperger Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Green economy Date: May 13, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

All eyes on the Fed

Last week the US Federal Reserve left the federal funds rate unchanged and lowered the interest rate on excess reserves. We review economists’ recent views on the monetary policy conduct and priorities of the United States’ central bank system.

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo Topic: Global economy and trade Date: May 6, 2019
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

Is this blog post legal (under new EU copyright law)?

How new EU rules on using snippets from news publishers and on copyright infringement liability might affect circulation of information, revenue distribution, market power and EU business competitiveness.

By: Catarina Midões Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 8, 2019
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Secular stagnation and the future of economic stabilisation

Larry Summers’ and Łukasz Rachel’s most recent study documents a secular fall in neutral real rates in advanced economies. According to the authors, this fall would be even more marked in the absence of offsetting fiscal policies. Policymaking in a world of permanently low interest rates may be hard to navigate, especially in troubled waters. We review economists’ views on the matter

By: Inês Goncalves Raposo and Bruegel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 1, 2019
Load more posts