Blog Post

The Greek tragedy: what next?

With reference to the latest Weekender, Thanks Shahin for this nice piece (again!) and for incorporating some of our comments to the earlier draft. I was always sceptical about the relief that a voluntary private sector involvement (PSI) may bring and argued for an orderly debt restructuring as a part of a comprehensive solution, which […]

By: Date: February 14, 2012 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

With reference to the latest Weekender,

Thanks Shahin for this nice piece (again!) and for incorporating some of our comments to the earlier draft.

I was always sceptical about the relief that a voluntary private sector involvement (PSI) may bring and argued for an orderly debt restructuring as a part of a comprehensive solution, which should include proper provisions for Greek banks, as you also argue, and for banks of other euro-area countries, better European safety nets and a growth programme (see the comprehensive plan proposed in the policy brief A comprehensive approach to the euro-area debt crisis from February 2011,  the policy contribution Debt restructuring in the euro area: A necessary but manageable evil?  from June 2011, and the column The Greek public debt misery: the right cure should follow the right diagnosis from October 2011). In this sense we have converged.

There are two major points of disagreement between us. One relates to need for haircut for official lending and the other relates to the consequences of a Greek default and the call for capital controls.

  1. Total Greek public debt was €347bn in September 2011 of which the IMF and bilateral euro-area lent about €80bn. The rest, ie approx. €270bn, was with the private sector and the ECB. In my view the ECB should face the same loss as private bondholders (otherwise, the ECB would be seen as a preferred creditor and hence its government bond purchases could be destabilising). There are not only private bondholders, but also private creditors of loans and they should be considered as well. Unfortunately it is very difficult to obtain information on private loans to the Greek general government. Were these loans granted by Greek banks (which need new capital in the event of a default)? Were these loans granted, at least partly, to local governments and state owned enterprises (which may need different treatment than the central government debt)? Yet we cannot exclude that a sufficient reduction in the approx. €270bn debt held by private creditors and the ECB would decrease the debt/GDP ratio to a level well below 100% percent of GDP soon, which should be the target. (Indeed, the current plan with the voluntary PSI to achieve a 120% debt ratio by 2020 will clearly not solve the problem.) We should call for a debt reduction in official loans only once we know for sure that a sufficient reduction in privately and ECB-held debt is not possible. But even then, for political reasons, I would avoid a direct haircut and would instead propose further lowering of the interest rate possibly to zero, suspension of debt amortisation for a decade, etc.
  2. I always had the view that a proper debt restructuring may not have such a devastating impact on the rest of the euro area as it is frequently assumed – when proper safeguards are put in place (see the pieces above). And I always had the view that debt restructuring should be organised within the euro area and Greece should not exit. You are right that in case Greek banks would not be supported, the outcome could be a Greek exit from the euro. But I think the probability of this happening is very small – much smaller than your text suggests. There are reasons concerning both Greece and the rest of the euro area. Concerning Greece, analysts from UBS have recently concluded that a weak country leaving the euro area would lose about one half of its GDP in the first year – I think they are right. That would necessitate even harsher fiscal austerity, since it is not very likely that in the event of a messy exit from the euro other euro-area partners would be happy to lend to Greece – without that, the Greek government could spend only tax revenues, which would be dramatically reduced by the collapse of GDP. And there would be longer term consequences as well, since the low credibility of the newly stand-alone Greek central bank would likely lead to much higher real interest rates as well as to a period of high inflation, which are bad for growth. Also, a euro-exit may be accompanied by an EU-exit and thereby Greece would give up huge transfers form the EU. Consequently, it is still better for Greece to stay inside the euro area even if the struggle will continue for many years, if not decades. It is also the best interest of euro-area partners to keep Greece inside. In addition to losses of both official and private lenders of the Greek government, foreign lenders of the Greek private sector would also suffer massive losses (most Greek private companies would also go bankrupt, hurting various financial and trade relations). But perhaps even more importantly, a Greek exit would open Pandora’s box and it would be very difficult to safeguard other weaker countries, such as Portugal and Ireland, even if capital controls were introduced as you suggests. If an orderly default is organised for Greece inside the euro area, contagion could be limited and the ‘final solution’ could even restore confidence to some extent. At the same time euro-area partners should put together a real programme for supporting Greek growth.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May - Jun
31-1
10:30

MICROPROD Final Event

Improving understanding of productivity, its drivers and the way we measure it.

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Peter Bøegh Nielsen, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Wolfhard Kaus, Javier Miranda, Steffen Müller, Hannu Piekkola, Verena Plümpe, Niclas Poitiers, Andrea Roventini, Gianluca Santoni, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi and Markus Zimmermann Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

Taming inflation?

What are the implications of prolonged inflation?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: May 25, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 25, 2022
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union

Policymakers must think coherently about the joint implications of their actions, from sanctions on Russia to subsidies and transfers to their own citizens, and avoid taking measures that contradict each other. This is what we try to do in this Policy Contribution, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects of relevance for Europe.

By: Olivier Blanchard and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

What drives implementation of the European Union’s policy recommendations to its member countries?

Article published in the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

Working Paper

Measuring the intangible economy to address policy challenges

The purpose of the first work package of the MICROPROD project was to improve the firm-level data infrastructure, expand the measurement of intangible assets and enable cross-country analyses of these productivity trends.

By: Marie Le Mouel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Macroeconomic and financial stability in changing times: conversation with Andrew Bailey

Guntram Wolff will be joined in conversation by Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

Speakers: Andrew Bailey and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 28, 2022
Read article
 

Opinion

European governance

How to reconcile increased green public investment needs with fiscal consolidation

The EU’s ambitious emissions reduction targets will require a major increase in green investments. This column considers options for increasing public green investment when major consolidations are needed after the fiscal support provided during the pandemic. The authors make the case for a green golden rule allowing green investment to be funded by deficits that would not count in the fiscal rules. Concerns about ‘greenwashing’ could be addressed through a narrow definition of green investments and strong institutional scrutiny, while countries with debt sustainability concerns could initially rely only on NGEU for their green investment.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Load more posts