Blog Post

Fiscal consolidation is no indiscriminate belt-tightening

In June it was Greece. In August it was France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. In September it was Greece and, once again, Spain. In November, France again. Soon very likely Belgium. And perhaps France for a third time. In spite of an ever-darker economic outlook, every month countries under pressure in the bond markets are […]

By: Date: November 14, 2011 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

In June it was Greece. In August it was France, Italy, Spain and Portugal. In September it was Greece and, once again, Spain. In November, France again. Soon very likely Belgium. And perhaps France for a third time. In spite of an ever-darker economic outlook, every month countries under pressure in the bond markets are announcing new budget restrictions in the hope of limiting their deficits and halting the slippage in their borrowing terms. Only Germany stands out, announcing a tax cut, though a modest one.

The cause of this shift to austerity at the very moment a downturn is materialising is obviously the interest-rate spreads in the eurozone. While the yield on German ten-year debt remains under two percent, it exceeds three percent for France, is close to six percent for Spain, and Italian yields have burst through the seven-percent barrier. It looks a no-brainer: even if it dopes the risk of recession, accelerated budget cuts are preferable to a lethal surge in rates.

As some no longer have access to capital markets, they do not actually have the option. But for others, this logic ignores three factors.

The first is that a sound budget strategy implies setting a target for the outturn (deficit or surplus) under prudent economic hypotheses, establishing a tax and spend profile consistent with this projection, and then sticking to it. This allows the ‘automatic stabilisers’ to come into play. This strategy is not a loose one, in fact it may even be very rigorous, but it avoids amplifying cycles, especially recessionary ones.

The second factor is that headlong consolidation is not necessarily the best way to reassure markets. This is particularly clear in the case of Italy, whose deficit (four percent of GDP this year) is much below those of Spain and France. It is not the deficit which finally spooked investors and turned them off Italian bonds but a cocktail of high debt, desperately slow growth and political paralysis. In a situation like this, nibbling at the deficit is at best a sideshow. What the markets expect is the implementation of reforms designed to durably lift the rate of growth and the installing of credible economic governance in the euro zone.

The third reason to doubt the benefit of hurried budgetary adjustments is that they generally operate through the channel of fiscal measures with immediate impact, which are economically damaging. Governments know this only too well: at the end of 2010 they were pencilling in spending cuts in their consolidation programmes while preserving the most productive, such as education and infrastructure. And on the tax side they were planning to broaden the base rather than raise rates. But since the start of the summer they have actually done the opposite. Rather than focus on spending, they have zeroed in on tax measures, for the most part increasing the rates of existing taxes. This is a bad signal.

So what should be done? No one doubts the need for a budgetary clean-up, but this is a long-term process. Instead of making knee-jerk cuts, governments should first sit down and set precise and detailed targets for the medium term and explain what they intend to do in consequence about spending and revenue.

Governments should then invest in the means to reestablish their credibility. This was the purpose in France of the ‘golden rule’ proposed by the government, which the Socialist Party has just rejected out of hand. This particular rule is not the only possible one but it is key that a stable and ambitious budgetary policy framework be adopted as of the start of the next term. This would add weight to the objective of a balanced budget by 2017.
Finally, governments should ensure that their budget and fiscal programmes are consistent with the aim of increasing growth potential. This entails on the one hand finding the sweet spot in terms of spending cuts and tax rises and, on the other, identifying on each side of the ledger the least harmful measures over the mid term. This takes time, thought and steel. In France it is to be hoped that, in this area, the coming presidential debate will provide the opportunity for an ordered debate on the candidates’ choices.

Download the supporting tables of this column click here to download the supporting tables of this column


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article
 

Blog Post

Will European Union recovery spending be enough to fill digital investment gaps?

The recovery facility will boost digital transformation, but questions remain whether it will be sufficient to achieve Europe’s digital ambitions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, J. Scott Marcus and Alkiviadis Tzaras Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 20, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1
12:30

The EU recovery fund - state of play and outlook

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 1- In this session we will discuss the EU recovery fund, its state of play and outlook.

Speakers: Nadia Calviño, Karolina Ekholm and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

A new direction for the European Union’s half-hearted semiconductor strategy

The EU needs a more targeted strategy to increase its presence in this strategic and thriving sector, building on its existing strengths, while accommodating its relatively low domestic needs.

By: Niclas Poitiers and Pauline Weil Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:00

Conversation on the recovery programmes

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session, we discuss the recovery programmes.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Mehreen Khan and Tadeusz Kościński Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
13:00

European banks: under global competitive pressure?

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - European banks have lost stature and remain generally low-profitability, low-valuation in comparison to their global peers. Is that a problem? If so, what can EU policymakers do to address it?

Speakers: José Antonio Álvarez Álvarez, Mairead McGuinness and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
15:45

Blending physical and virtual: shaping the new workplace

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - This panel will cover the changes the COVID-19 pandemic made to our workplaces, and what to expect in the near future.

Speakers: Nicholas Bloom, Michael Froman, Mario Mariniello, Sara Matthieu and Luca Visentini Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Academy Palace
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
09:00

The role of the EU's trade strategy for an inclusive and sustainable recovery

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - We are delighted to welcome Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People to talk about Europe's trade strategy.

Speakers: Valdis Dombrovskis, Alicia García-Herrero and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Conference on the Future of Europe: envisioning EU citizens engagement

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - Panellists will discuss different options and what they may entail while revisiting the debates on the future of Europe at national and EU-level that have been conducted thus far.

Speakers: Caroline de Gruyter, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Niclas Poitiers and György Szapáry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Fair vaccine access is a goal Europe cannot afford to miss – July update

European countries must do more to tackle the vaccine uptake gap. Vaccination data should be published at the maximum granularity level so researchers and local decision-makers can monitor progress.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Mario Mariniello Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

SPACs in the gap

Special-purpose acquisition vehicles could fill a gap in European equity markets and lure risk-averse investors off the sidelines.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts