Blog Post

Give the EU budget a chance

A version of this p-ed was also published in Kathimerini The recent Commission proposal for the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) dedicates surprisingly little attention to the role of the budget in times of crisis. Given that the EU budget is the only item that EU member states have truly in common, the message behind […]

By: Date: July 1, 2011 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

A version of this p-ed was also published in Kathimerini

The recent Commission proposal for the next multiannual financial framework (MFF) dedicates surprisingly little attention to the role of the budget in times of crisis. Given that the EU budget is the only item that EU member states have truly in common, the message behind is probably that Europe is still not ready to recognise that the only definitive solution to the debt crisis is some form of socialization of the costs of the crisis.

One does not have to go that far, anyway. The EU budget can still serve an important function in the current situation, with or without a Greek default. The wise use of EU funds looks like the only type of socialization one can think of as being politically realistic in the present time.The EU budget can play both an indirect and a direct role in crisis management and resolution. As to the former, it should be reminded that the EU is providing lending to non-euro and euro-zone countries under the Medium-Term Financial Assistance (MTFA) facility by collecting capital on financial markets under implicit EU budget guarantee. Moreover, there is extensive scope for using the Budget to leverage the financing of long-term investment projects by the private sector. This is one point the Commission has stressed throughout its Communication but it is indeed a timid and only indirect use of EU resources. The European Investment Bank (EIB), which provides loans also to match co-financing of EU-funded projects, has not exhausted its lending capacity. Some member states have used EIB loans more than others (e.g. Spain). On the other hand, Greece is amongst those that have only moderately applied for EIB loans.

As to the Budget’s direct function, EU funds need to be utilized to finance strategic investment and growth-enhancing structural reforms, priorities should be carefully selected and the pace of absorption of this money accelerated, no matter what it takes. EU Member States have still large amounts of unused Structural and Cohesion Funds from the current financial perspective running from 2007 to 2013. In the case of Greece, unused funds are in the order of 7% of GDP out of an initially allocated amount equal to about 9% of GDP. There are different reasons behind the country’s low absorption capacity ranging from poor management to the incapacity to match co-financing, which for each public authorities sponsoring the project would imply a disbursement that can vary between 15% and 50% of the project’s total costs, depending on the type of project.

Whatever the reason behind low absorption, it is time to take action. We suggested a few months ago that a special fund is created to revive the economies of problematic countries[1]. President of the Commission Barroso has recently suggested to allocate to Greece 1bn euros out of the unused EU funds that have been already allocated to the country at the beginning of the current financial framework. Apparently, co-financing may come at a later stage. In tandem, the Commission will provide technical assistance in the preparation of the projects that will be financed in this way. It is de facto a special fund for economic revival. It will be effective only if managed by the Commission, possibly with the support of an executive agency as in the case of the Trans-European Networks, and jointly with public authorities.This modus operandi seems more apt for the financing of large infrastructural projects from transport, to telecommunications and energy but it is not to be excluded that EU funds allocated in this manner – the initial 1bn euros and whatever follows after that – are used for smaller-scale projects aimed at improving regional competitiveness.

Greek public authorities should not miss the opportunity of engaging in a rapid absorption of EU funds with the support of the Commission so as to soften the recessionary effects of the upcoming austerity package and send a message of optimism to the national public opinion.


[1] Benedicta Marzinotto (2011), A European Fund for Economic Revival in Crisis Countries, Bruegel Policy Contribution, March.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Fiscal policy and rules after the pandemic

What are the possibilities for shaping the new fiscal policy?

Speakers: Zsolt Darvas, Maria Demertzis, Michel Heijdra and Katja Lautar Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 24, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

European governance

Including home-ownership costs in the inflation indicator is not just a technical issue

The European Central Bank is right to propose inclusion of owner-occupied housing services in the inflation indicator. But the ECB’s preferred method would involve an asset price in the consumer inflation indicator.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fiscal arithmetic and risk of sovereign insolvency

The record-high debt levels in advanced economies increase the risk of sovereign insolvency. Governments should start fiscal consolidation soon in an environment of low nominal and real interest rates and post-COVID growth.

By: Marek Dabrowski Topic: Global economy and trade, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Opinion

European governance

Growth and inflation after the pandemic in the EU

Countries hit comparatively hard during the financial crisis, helped also by domestic and European policies, are bouncing back from the pandemic faster than their peers.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 18, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceFrench Senate

European Union countries’ National Recovery and Resilience Plans: A cross-country comparison

Testimony before the Economic Affairs Committee of the French Senate.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European governance, French Senate, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 12, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Next Generation EU borrowing: a first assessment

The Next Generation EU programme is radically changing the way the EU finances itself and interacts with financial markets. This paper assesses the first design decisions made by the European Commission and the issuances that have taken place so far. It also outlines the potential risks and opportunities linked to this upgrading of the EU borrowing.

By: Rebecca Christie, Grégory Claeys and Pauline Weil Topic: Banking and capital markets, European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 10, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Parliamentary Testimony

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The New Euro Area Inflation Indicator and Target: The Right Reset?

Testimony to the Monetary Dialogue Preparatory Meeting of the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Phasing out COVID-19 emergency support programmes: effects on productivity and financial stability

How can European countries phase out the COVID-19 support measures without having a negative impact on productivity and financial stability?

Speakers: Eric Bartelsman, Maria Demertzis, Peter Grasmann and Laurie Mayers Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 9, 2021
Read article
 

External Publication

European governanceEuropean Parliament

The new euro area inflation indicator and target: the right reset?

In-depth analysis on the European Central Bank's revised inflation target prepared for the European Parliament's Committee on Economic and Monetary Affairs (ECON).

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Martins Topic: European governance, European Parliament, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

European monetary policy: lessons from the past two decades

This event will feature the presentation of “Monetary Policy in Times of Crisis – A Tale of Two Decades of the European Central Bank."

Speakers: Petra Geraats, Wolfgang Lemke, Francesco Papadia and Massimo Rostagno Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

COVID-19 financial aid and productivity: has support been well spent?

While support schemes during the pandemic were not targeted at protecting ‘good’ firms, financial support mostly went to those with the capacity to survive and succeed. Labour schemes have been effective in protecting employment.

By: Carlo Altomonte, Maria Demertzis, Lionel Fontagné and Steffen Müller Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

Does money growth tell us anything about inflation?

Attention should be paid to a possible sequence of negative events: if inflation would start to be volatile and money growth remains high, efforts to control inflation could be undermined.

By: Leonardo Cadamuro and Francesco Papadia Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: November 4, 2021
Load more posts