Blog Post

Unsinkable like the Titanic

Nearly a century after the 10 April 1912 departure of the Titanic from Southampton to New York, only to sink a few days later, the informal ECOFIN and Eurogroup meetings will take place on 8/9 April 2011 in the beautiful Royal Palace of Gödöllő, Hungary. In April 1912 there were repeated iceberg warnings and Captain […]

By: Date: April 4, 2011 Topic: Macroeconomic policy

Nearly a century after the 10 April 1912 departure of the Titanic from Southampton to New York, only to sink a few days later, the informal ECOFIN and Eurogroup meetings will take place on 8/9 April 2011 in the beautiful Royal Palace of Gödöllő, Hungary. In April 1912 there were repeated iceberg warnings and Captain Smith of Titanic slightly altered his course southwards. But the sudden collision with an iceberg on a dark night sank the liner in a few hours, even though the vessel had been thought of as unsinkable.

The Gödöllő meeting of finance ministers is not expected to be followed by a sinking, specifically by the sinking of the euro area. But there are important warnings that should be taken very seriously. I list three of them.

First, two rating agencies, Standard and Poor’s, and Fitch, concluded that the recent agreement on the European Stability Mechanism (ESM), which will be Europe’s own ‘European Monetary Fund’ from mid-2013, will actually make the current crisis worse. According to political declarations on the design of the ESM, no sovereign default will occur before mid-2013; sovereign defaults might occur thereafter, but only concerning bonds issues after mid-2013.

But this dichotomy is inconsistent. Whenever a country has a solvency problem, it will not be able to borrow from the markets as the newly issued bonds will have a junior status compared to existing bonds. With the lack of market borrowing, countries with doubts over their fiscal sustainability should either borrow from the ESM (or during the next two years, from its predecessors, the EFSF and EFSM – so many complicated acronyms), or default/restructure.

Greece and Ireland already have official financing programmes which will transfer about one third of their debt to official creditors. It is unlikely that the German, Dutch or Finnish electorates, for example, would be happy to agree to a new financing programme for these countries on the expiry of their current programmes in 2013. Unanimity will be needed for an ESM programme, and the lack of it will most likely block this. And while economic situations may change by 2013, a new programme would most likely be undesirable on economic grounds as well.

Therefore, in the absence of a new programme, default must come, but as there will be no newly issued debt, default will apply to existing debt despite current declarations. Even though among the three threatened countries, Greece, Ireland and Portugal, only Greece has a fundamentally unsustainable situation in my assessment, the uncertainties about their fiscal sustainability and eventual ESM lending may push the other two countries to the brink as well.

Second, Der Spiegel reported the IMF as demanding Greek debt restructuring, though this was strongly denied by the IMF’s spokeswoman. Certainly, it is not possible to know for sure what goes on backstage at the IMF. But this can be an indication that the stance is changing at the IMF and indeed there are good reasons for a restructuring of Greek public debt. The major arguments against a restructuring are that it could have an unexpected impact on Greece (clearly: it’ll be a messy process), it could spill over to other countries, and thereby it could impact the euro-area banking industry, which is thought to be fragile. But if something is unsustainable, then the choice is more one of timing. An earlier default could bring clarity, while a later default may occur at a time when the euro-area banking industry might be stronger.

A third worrying factor is related to expected euro-area interest rate developments. The rise in euro-area inflation expectations will make it inevitable for the ECB to start a series of interest rate hikes in April 2011. The ECB will be right to do this, even though the critics are legion. In the euro area’s flawed governance framework, the ECB remained almost the only institution that more or less maintained its credibility. Giving up its anti-inflationary mandate, as many suggest, would undermine this last pillar of the euro, and in any case, solving the euro-area debt crisis should not be the job of the central bank. The ECB has already stretched the limits of its mandate by purchasing Greek, Irish and Portuguese bonds and by giving euro-area banks, in particular Irish and Greek banks, a lifeline. But it should not compromise its monetary policy credibility. Clearly, a rise in short term interest rates will feed through to long-term interest rates and will make it more difficult for all euro-area governments, including the most troubled ones, to regain control over public finances.

To avoid the fate of Titanic, the Eurogroup and ECOFIN should pay proper attention to these warnings. The conclusion is that they should concentrate on solving the current crisis. They should not mix sovereign solvency and liquidity crises as it may drive purely liquidity-constrained countries into insolvency. But it is clearly not sufficient in itself to push Greece into debt restructuring. Prior to that, the systemic interdependence between banking and sovereign crises should be addressed, for which proper stress tests and bank recapitalisation are needed across the whole euro area. A better way of managing distressed cross-border banks is also required. Unfortunately, such decisions are not likely to be reached in Gödöllő, partly because such moves are costly in terms of votes and money, and partly because the iceberg might be avoided for now. But note that Captain Smith was also confident of this in April 1912.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May
25
14:30

How can we support and restructure firms hit by the COVID-19 crisis?

What are the vulnerabilities and risks in the enterprise sector and how prepared are countries to handle a large-scale restructuring of businesses?

Speakers: Ceyla Pazarbasioglu and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

May - Jun
31-1
10:30

MICROPROD Final Event

Final conference of the MICROPROD project

Speakers: Carlo Altomonte, Eric Bartelsman, Marta Bisztray, Italo Colantone, Maria Demertzis, Wolfhard Kaus, Javier Miranda, Steffen Müller, Verena Plümpe, Niclas Poitiers, Andrea Roventini, Gianluca Santoni, Valerie Smeets, Nicola Viegi and Markus Zimmermann Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event
 

Past Event

Past Event

[Cancelled] Shifting taxes in order to achieve green goals

[This event is cancelled until further notice] How could shifting the tax burden from labour to pollution and resources help the EU reach its climate goals?

Speakers: Niclas Poitiers and Femke Groothuis Topic: Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 12, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

How are crises changing central bank doctrines?

How is monetary policy evolving in the face of recent crises? With central banks taking on new roles, how accountable are they to democratic institutions?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Benoît Coeuré, Pervenche Berès, Hans-Helmut Kotz and Athanasios Orphanides Topic: Macroeconomic policy Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels Date: May 11, 2022
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Book/Special report

European governanceInclusive growth

Bruegel annual report 2021

The Bruegel annual report provides a broad overview of the organisation's work in the previous year.

By: Bruegel Topic: Banking and capital markets, Digital economy and innovation, European governance, Global economy and trade, Green economy, Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: May 6, 2022
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

European governance

Fiscal support and monetary vigilance: economic policy implications of the Russia-Ukraine war for the European Union

Policymakers must think coherently about the joint implications of their actions, from sanctions on Russia to subsidies and transfers to their own citizens, and avoid taking measures that contradict each other. This is what we try to do in this Policy Contribution, focusing on the macroeconomic aspects of relevance for Europe.

By: Olivier Blanchard and Jean Pisani-Ferry Topic: European governance, Macroeconomic policy Date: April 29, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic
 

Working Paper

The low productivity of European firms: how can policies enhance the allocation of resources?

A summary of the most important policy lessons from research undertaken in the MICROPROD project work package 4, related to the allocation of the factors of production, with a special focus on the weak dynamism of European small and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs).

By: Grégory Claeys, Marie Le Mouel and Giovanni Sgaravatti Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 25, 2022
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

What drives implementation of the European Union’s policy recommendations to its member countries?

Article published in the Journal of Economic Policy Reform.

By: Konstantinos Efstathiou and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 13, 2022
Read article Download PDF More on this topic More by this author
 

Working Paper

Measuring the intangible economy to address policy challenges

The purpose of the first work package of the MICROPROD project was to improve the firm-level data infrastructure, expand the measurement of intangible assets and enable cross-country analyses of these productivity trends.

By: Marie Le Mouel Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 11, 2022
Read about event More on this topic
 

Past Event

Past Event

Macroeconomic and financial stability in changing times: conversation with Andrew Bailey

Guntram Wolff will be joined in conversation by Andrew Bailey, Governor of the Bank of England.

Speakers: Andrew Bailey and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 28, 2022
Read article
 

Opinion

European governance

How to reconcile increased green public investment needs with fiscal consolidation

The EU’s ambitious emissions reduction targets will require a major increase in green investments. This column considers options for increasing public green investment when major consolidations are needed after the fiscal support provided during the pandemic. The authors make the case for a green golden rule allowing green investment to be funded by deficits that would not count in the fiscal rules. Concerns about ‘greenwashing’ could be addressed through a narrow definition of green investments and strong institutional scrutiny, while countries with debt sustainability concerns could initially rely only on NGEU for their green investment.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European governance, Green economy, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Opinion

The week inflation became entrenched

The events that have unfolded since 24 February have solved one dispute: inflation is no longer temporary.

By: Maria Demertzis Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: March 8, 2022
Load more posts