Blog Post

The current unemployment crisis through the lens of the 2010 Nobel

What’s at stake:The 2010 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to Peter Diamond, Dale Mortensen, and Christopher Pissarides "for their analysis of markets with search frictions”. The trio pioneered research into the difficulties buyers and sellers often face in finding each other in the marketplace – and in particular, how that applies in the […]

By: Date: November 12, 2010 Topic: Global economy and trade

What’s at stake:The 2010 Nobel Prize in Economics has been awarded to Peter Diamond, Dale Mortensen, and Christopher Pissarides "for their analysis of markets with search frictions”. The trio pioneered research into the difficulties buyers and sellers often face in finding each other in the marketplace – and in particular, how that applies in the job market. These frictions derive from several sources, including imperfect information about trading partners, heterogeneous demand and supply, slow mobility, coordination failures and other similar factors.

An introduction to their work

Tyler Cowen argues that a key breakthrough was to realise that the problem was not how to explain unemployment per se but rather how to explain hiring, firing, quits, vacancies and job search and to think of unemployment as the result of all of this underlying microeconomic behaviour. This underlying behaviour involves not just workers looking for jobs but also employers looking for workers so explaining unemployment would require a theory of job search, worker search and matching and each aspect of the theory would have to be consistent with every other aspect; i.e. how much workers search depends on how much employers are searching (e.g. advertising) and vice-versa and also on the quality of matching and all of these considerations need to be addressed together. Cowen has a series on of posts that explains and summarises the contributions of each recipient: Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides

Edward L. Glaeser writes that the prize manages both to honour timeless research on core economic questions and to highlight the ways in which economics addresses a most timely global problem. New paradigms emerge when reality crashes against theory, and that’s what brought us the search theory of Professors Diamond, Mortensen and Pissarides in reaction to the awful job the Economics 101 model was doing at explaining an American civilian labour force where nearly one-tenth say they want a job and can’t find one. Search models don’t just assume that buyers and sellers face a market-clearing price — they try to actually describe the process that determines that price. The work of these economists does not tell us how to fix our current high unemployment levels, but it does help us to make some sense of our current distress. Their models tell us that common wisdom — like the belief that higher unemployment benefits always increase unemployment — may be wrong and that policies that improve matching may have great value.

Shedding lights on current problems

Mark Thoma argues that their work helps us to understand how it is that there can be workers willing to work, firms that are willing to hire, and yet still have an elevated unemployment rate.

Barbara Petrongolo
points out that a direct consequence of frictions is that, as markets typically do not clear; unemployed workers and job vacancies may coexist, even within very narrowly defined labour market segments. In particular, unemployment persists in equilibrium because before all unemployed workers find new jobs, some of the existing jobs break up, providing a new inflow into unemployment. This would predict that, after an adverse economic shock, it takes time to bring back unemployment to the pre-shock level, and thus recovery after a recession may be slow, even once new job opportunities start to arise.

Paul Krugman argues that the most relevant paper for the current debate on structural vs. cyclical unemployment is Blanchard and Diamond on the Beveridge Curve — the relationship between job vacancies and unemployment.  It shows that structural unemployment is a real issue, and that the volume of structural unemployment shifts over time. It also gives us a simple way to make the distinction about whether we’re mainly facing a rise in cyclical or structural unemployment: “The economy, however, is subject to two types of shocks with quite different effects. Changes in the level of aggregate activity cause rates of job creation and job destruction to move in opposite directions, while changes in the intensity of the reallocation process cause them to move in parallel.”

Mark Thoma argues that their work also implies that distinctions between cyclical and structural unemployment may not be particularly useful since cyclical unemployment can turn into a structural problem if search persists for too long and skills deteriorate — the deterioration in skills makes a match even less likely and hence creates a structural problem — and these workers become part of the long-term or permanently unemployed.

Bruegel Economic Blogs Review is an information service that surveys external blogs. It does not survey Bruegel’s own publications, nor does it include comments by Bruegel authors.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Nov
9
11:00

Phasing out COVID-19 emergency support programmes: effects on productivity and financial stability

How can European countries phase out the COVID-19 support measures without having a negative impact on productivity and financial stability?

Speakers: Maria Demertzis and Laurie Mayers Topic: Macroeconomic policy
Read article
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Concentration of artificial intelligence and other frontier IT skills

Online job postings indicate that demand from top tech firms for frontier IT skills is about double their demand for other IT skills. This could indicate increasing concentration of skills in a few firms, with other firms left behind.

By: Wang Jin, Georgios Petropoulos and Sebastian Steffen Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: October 21, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Making antitrust work for, not against, gig workers and the self-employed

Policymakers should act to deal with labour-market concentration trends that potentially harm workers, especially gig workers and the self-employed.

By: Georgios Petropoulos Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: October 11, 2021
Read article
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Remote work, EU labour markets and wage inequality

More remote working in the wake of the pandemic could exacerbate wage inequality, with young workers, women and the low educated potentially losing out.

By: Georgios Petropoulos and Tom Schraepen Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: September 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Designing a hybrid work organisation

Post-pandemic hybrid work models should be carefully planned, taking into account individual and organisational needs.

By: Laura Nurski Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: July 5, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Podcast

Podcast

The skills of the future

What challenges and opportunities does technology bring to the labour market?

By: The Sound of Economics Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: June 23, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Algorithmic management is the past, not the future of work

Algorithmic management is the twenty-first century’s scientific management. Job quality measures should be included explicitly in health and safety risk assessments for workplace artificial-intelligence systems.

By: Laura Nurski Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: May 6, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

External Publication

Wealth distribution and social mobility

This report explores the distribution of household wealth in the EU Member States and analyses the role of wealth in social mobility.

By: Zsolt Darvas and Catarina Midões Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: April 1, 2021
Read article Download PDF More by this author
 

Working Paper

The unequal inequality impact of the COVID-19 pandemic

Less-educated workers have suffered most from job losses in the COVID-19 pandemic, and it is quite likely there was a significant increase in European Union income inequality in 2020.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: Global economy and trade, Macroeconomic policy Date: March 30, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

Self-employment, COVID-19, and the future of work for knowledge workers

The experiences of the self-employed could give a glimpse into the future of work for knowledge workers in a post-pandemic world.

By: Milena Nikolova Topic: Digital economy and innovation, Inclusive growth Date: March 8, 2021
Read article More on this topic More by this author
 

Blog Post

COVID-19 has widened the income gap in Europe

Workers with low-educational levels suffered far worse than others in terms of COVID-19 related job losses during the first half of 2020 in the EU. Jobs for tertiary-educated workers even increased. Thus, the pandemic has increased income inequality, reinforcing the case for inclusive development.

By: Zsolt Darvas Topic: Macroeconomic policy Date: December 3, 2020
Read article
 

Blog Post

Inclusive growth

The scarring effect of COVID-19: youth unemployment in Europe

Even before the pandemic, youth unemployment in the European Union was three times higher than among the over-55s. COVID-19 threatens to undo the last decade of progress: policymakers must act to avoid Europe’s youth suffering the scarring effect.

By: Monika Grzegorczyk and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: Inclusive growth, Macroeconomic policy Date: November 28, 2020
Load more posts