Blog Post

Fear of debt

It only took a few months for fear of the crisis to be replaced by fear of debt. Before summer it was the recovery which dominated all other subjects. Now it has been eclipsed by talk of deficits and the rising levels of public debt. It is easy to see why. The deficit numbers expected […]

By: Date: October 26, 2009 Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance

It only took a few months for fear of the crisis to be replaced by fear of debt. Before summer it was the recovery which dominated all other subjects. Now it has been eclipsed by talk of deficits and the rising levels of public debt.

It is easy to see why. The deficit numbers expected for 2010 look suspiciously like the inflation figures of the 1970s: some countries below 5% of GDP, most between 5% and 10% and a few even above 10%. As for the debt, the European Commission forecasts that between 2007 and 2013 it will, in the best possible scenario, increase by an average of 30 percentage points of GDP. We should definitely expect a higher figure. And for some countries – certainly Ireland and the UK – the rise in debt will exceed 30 points by 2010. There is legitimate concern.

What is to be done? It is too early to act. Euro-area GDP is currently 5% below its level at the start of 2008, the situation is more serious in the UK and even more so in central Europe. And things would have been worse still if Europe had not opted for recovery, or if it had had the bright idea of limiting deficits. The lesson of the 1930s had been learned and governments did not apply belt-tightening measures on top of the crisis. This is to be welcomed, rather than ruing now what are the purely mechanical consequences of what was a perfectly sound decision. It will only be in 2011, when the recovery – it is to be hoped – is well underway that deficits can start to be corrected.

But it is not too early to start preparing the ground both at national and European level, and to draw up so-called exit strategies.

First, all countries will be obliged to take large-scale action. It will not be possible to rely solely on the recovery since part of the revenue lost will not be recouped, and because the burden of additional debt will have to be paid for just as the impact of ageing populations begins to weigh on public budgets. Stabilising – to say nothing of reducing – debt levels will therefore require a combination of tax measures, choices as to which tasks should remain to government and which can be outsourced, and without doubt postponement of the retirement age. The Swedes, who went through this in the 1990s, say that in order to succeed it is better to get going early, be transparent about the size of the challenge and announce everything in a package – in other words the reverse of the habitual hodgepodge.

In order to borrow at a reasonable rate, it will be necessary to provide evidence of sound behaviour. The crisis has taught us what the debt should be earmarked for: not for day-to-day spending but to smooth cyclical fluctuations and deal with exceptional shocks – crises, wars, environmental disasters – where it is necessary to spread the cost over time. One performance indicator is therefore the ability to reduce the debt ratio during the upswing. But over the last 25 years there have been 12 years of reduction in the UK and Spain, nine years in the US, six in Germany and only five in France. Incapacity to cut debt when the economy is doing well is a sign of a political and institutional malfunction which we can ill afford in the future. Germany has just sought to remedy this by inserting a budget rule in its constitution. As for France, it is for the moment remaining true to its culture of discretionary decisions.

European countries are – just like those of the G20 at global level – together facing a coordination problem without precedent. On the one hand, they must absolutely reduce their deficits. On the other hand, they must avoid making deep and simultaneous budget cuts which might stifle the recovery. This means that they must now agree on the size and pace of their budget measures and, at the same time, on action designed to raise the potential growth rate. The tools at their disposal will not be sufficient, in particular the EU’s Stability and Growth Pact whose credibility – already limited before the crisis – is now seriously damaged. Temporarily – for at least two years, probably nearer five – they will have to rise above the futile consultations which are often the norm and adopt a common strategy for the euro area. We will shortly find out whether the ability to act together which they discovered during the crisis survives the recovery.


Republishing and referencing

Bruegel considers itself a public good and takes no institutional standpoint. Anyone is free to republish and/or quote this post without prior consent. Please provide a full reference, clearly stating Bruegel and the relevant author as the source, and include a prominent hyperlink to the original post.

Read article
 

Blog Post

Will European Union recovery spending be enough to fill digital investment gaps?

The recovery facility will boost digital transformation, but questions remain whether it will be sufficient to achieve Europe’s digital ambitions.

By: Zsolt Darvas, J. Scott Marcus and Alkiviadis Tzaras Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 20, 2021
Read article Download PDF
 

Policy Contribution

A new direction for the European Union’s half-hearted semiconductor strategy

The EU needs a more targeted strategy to increase its presence in this strategic and thriving sector, building on its existing strengths, while accommodating its relatively low domestic needs.

By: Niclas Poitiers and Pauline Weil Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Innovation & Competition Policy Date: July 15, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

Fit for 55 marks Europe’s climate moment of truth

With Fit for 55, Europe is the global first mover in turning a long-term net-zero goal into real-world policies, marking the entry of climate policy into the daily life of all citizens and businesses.

By: Simone Tagliapietra Topic: Energy & Climate, European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

Fair vaccine access is a goal Europe cannot afford to miss – July update

European countries must do more to tackle the vaccine uptake gap. Vaccination data should be published at the maximum granularity level so researchers and local decision-makers can monitor progress.

By: Lionel Guetta-Jeanrenaud and Mario Mariniello Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 14, 2021
Read article More by this author
 

Blog Post

SPACs in the gap

Special-purpose acquisition vehicles could fill a gap in European equity markets and lure risk-averse investors off the sidelines.

By: Rebecca Christie Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Date: July 13, 2021
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
1
12:30

The EU recovery fund - state of play and outlook

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 1- In this session we will discuss the EU recovery fund, its state of play and outlook.

Speakers: Nadia Calviño, Karolina Ekholm and Guntram B. Wolff Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Bruegel, Rue de la Charité 33, 1210 Brussels
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
10:00

Conversation on the recovery programmes

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2- In this session, we discuss the recovery programmes.

Speakers: Maria Demertzis, Mehreen Khan and Tadeusz Kościński Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
13:00

European banks: under global competitive pressure?

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - European banks have lost stature and remain generally low-profitability, low-valuation in comparison to their global peers. Is that a problem? If so, what can EU policymakers do to address it?

Speakers: José Antonio Álvarez Álvarez, Mairead McGuinness and Nicolas Véron Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance, Finance & Financial Regulation Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
2
15:45

Blending physical and virtual: shaping the new workplace

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 2 - This panel will cover the changes the COVID-19 pandemic made to our workplaces, and what to expect in the near future.

Speakers: Nicholas Bloom, Michael Froman, Mario Mariniello, Sara Matthieu and Luca Visentini Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Academy Palace
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
09:00

The role of the EU's trade strategy for an inclusive and sustainable recovery

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - We are delighted to welcome Valdis Dombrovskis, Executive Vice President of the European Commission for An Economy that Works for People to talk about Europe's trade strategy.

Speakers: Valdis Dombrovskis and Alicia García-Herrero Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read about event More on this topic
 

Upcoming Event

Sep
3
10:15

Conference on the Future of Europe: envisioning EU citizens engagement

Bruegel Annual Meetings, Day 3 - Panellists will discuss different options and what they may entail while revisiting the debates on the future of Europe at national and EU-level that have been conducted thus far.

Speakers: Caroline de Gruyter, Kalypso Nicolaïdis, Niclas Poitiers and György Szapáry Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Location: Palais des Academies, Rue Ducale 1
Read article More on this topic
 

Blog Post

A breakdown of EU countries’ post-pandemic green spending plans

An analysis of European Union countries’ recovery plans shows widely differing green spending priorities.

By: Klaas Lenaerts and Simone Tagliapietra Topic: European Macroeconomics & Governance Date: July 8, 2021
Load more posts