Though the renminbi is not yet convertible, the international monetary regime has already started to move towards a 'multipolar' system, with the dollar, the euro and the renminbi as its key likely pillars. This shift corresponds to the long-term evolution of the balance of economic weight in the world economy. Such an evolution may mitigate some of the flaws of the present (non-) system, such as the rigidity of key exchange rates, the asymmetry of balance of-payments adjustments or what remains of the Triffin dilemma. However it may exacerbate other problems, such as short-run exchange rate volatility or the scope for ‘currency wars’, while leaving key questions unresolved, such as the response to capital flows global liquidity provision. Hence, in itself, a multipolar regime can be both the best and the worst of all regimes.
Which of these alternatives will materialise depends on the degree of cooperation within a multilateral framework.

Add a comment
tnciglkng 2nd July 2011
3FtECi fstmpnxkjhdh
Reply to tnciglkng | Report comment
Laneta 2nd July 2011
Geez, that's ubnleievable. Kudos and such.
Reply to Laneta | Report comment
Sukumar Nandi 23rd April 2011
I read the paper. It's interesting with lot of up-to-date information.
The analysis on renminbi seems to me a bit inadquate considering the fact of arbrtariness of the political regime and since economic policies are simply the derivative of the political regime, the credibility of the currency suffers
Reply to Sukumar Nandi | Report comment
Frans Verhagen 4th April 2011
Why not considering making all currencies convertible or moving towards world currency by probing the feasibility of having a monetary standard upon either long-term monetary policy can be based? By having a standard most of the present monetary problems would be solved or at least reduced, including the volatility of exchange rates and the lack of credit and liquidity. www.timun.net proposes a carbon-based international monetary system that would form the basis of a global governance system that would integrate the social, economic and environmental pillars of sustainable development.
Reply to Frans Verhagen | Report comment